Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez

Dr. Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2012 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
KSKathryn E. Sieving
Kathryn E. Sieving

18 March 2024 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABA. Cole Burton
A. Cole Burton
CBChristopher Beirne
Christopher Beirne
KGKaitlyn M. Gaynor
Kaitlyn M. Gaynor
CSCatherine Sun
Catherine Sun
AGAlys Granados
Alys Granados
RKRoland Kays
Roland Kays
Wildlife must adapt to human presence to survive in the Anthropocene, so it is critical to understand species responses to humans in different contexts. We used camera trapping as a lens to view mammal responses to changes in human activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Across 163 species sampled in 102 projects around the world, changes in the amount and timing of animal activity varied widely. Under higher human activity, mammals were less active in undeveloped areas but unexpectedly more active in developed areas while exhibiting greater nocturnality. Carnivores were most sensitive, showing the strongest decreases in activity and greatest increases in nocturnality. Wildlife managers must consider how habituation and uneven sensitivity across species may cause fundamental differences in human–wildlife interactions along gradients of human influence.

1 November 2016 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLT. Luarte
T. Luarte
CBC.C. Bonta
C.C. Bonta
ESEduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
PQP.A. Quijón
P.A. Quijón
CMC. Miranda
C. Miranda
CDC. Duarte
C. Duarte

1 May 2019 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCristian Duarte
Cristian Duarte
DQDiego Quintanilla-Ahumada
Diego Quintanilla-Ahumada
CACristobal Anguita
Cristobal Anguita
PMPatricio H. Manríquez
Patricio H. Manríquez
SWStephen Widdicombe
Stephen Widdicombe
PQPedro A. Quijón
Pedro A. Quijón

9 June 2011 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
KSKathryn E. Sieving
Kathryn E. Sieving

20 January 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaximiliano A Sepúlveda
Maximiliano A Sepúlveda
RSRandall S Singer
Randall S Singer
ESEduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
PSPaulina Stowhas
Paulina Stowhas
KPKatharine Pelican
Katharine Pelican
Although domestic dogs play many important roles in rural households, they can also be an important threat to the conservation of wild vertebrates due to predation, competition and transmission of infectious diseases. An increasing number of studies have addressed the impact of dogs on wildlife but have tended to ignore the motivations and attitudes of the humans who keep these dogs and how the function of dogs might influence dog-wildlife interactions. To determine whether the function of domestic dogs in rural communities influences their interactions with wildlife, we conducted surveys in rural areas surrounding protected lands in the Valdivian Temperate Forests of Chile. Sixty percent of farm animal owners reported the use of dogs as one of the primary means of protecting livestock from predators. The probability of dog–wild carnivore interactions was significantly associated with the raising of poultry. In contrast, dog–wild prey interactions were not associated with livestock presence but had a significant association with poor quality diet as observed in previous studies. Dog owners reported that they actively encouraged the dogs to chase off predators, accounting for 25–75% of the dog–wild carnivore interactions observed, depending on the predator species. Humans controlled the dog population by killing pups and unwanted individuals resulting in few additions to the dog population through breeding; the importation of predominantly male dogs from urban areas resulted in a sex ratios highly dominated by males. These results indicate that dog interactions with wildlife are related to the role of the dog in the household and are directly influenced by their owners. To avoid conflict with local communities in conservation areas, it is important to develop strategies for managing dogs that balance conservation needs with the roles that dogs play in these rural households.