Fernando López-Campos

Dr. Fernando López-Campos

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMitchell Lawrence
Mitchell Lawrence
DODaisuke Obinata
Daisuke Obinata
Shahneen K. SandhuShahneen K. Sandhu
Shahneen K. Sandhu
LSLuke Selth
Luke Selth
SWStephen Q. Wong
Stephen Q. Wong
Gail RisbridgerGail Risbridger
Gail Risbridger

1 April 2019 in Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMaria Rodriguez-Ruiz
Maria Rodriguez-Ruiz
IRI. Rodriguez
I. Rodriguez
OLOlwen Leaman
Olwen Leaman
FLFernando López-Campos
Fernando López-Campos
AMAngel Montero
Angel Montero
IMIGNACIO MELERO
IGNACIO MELERO

16 March 2021 in Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ECEliseo Carrasco-Esteban
Eliseo Carrasco-Esteban
JDJosé Antonio Domínguez-Rullán
José Antonio Domínguez-Rullán
PBPatricia Barrionuevo-Castillo
Patricia Barrionuevo-Castillo
LPLira Pelari-Mici
Lira Pelari-Mici
OLOlwen Leaman
Olwen Leaman
FLFernando López-Campos
Fernando López-Campos
Background. Worldwide, lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. Nevertheless, new therapeutic agents have been developed to treat lung cancer that could change this mortality-rate. Interestingly, incredible advances have occurred in recent years in the development and application of nanotechnology in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Aim. Nanoparticles have the ability to incorporate multiple drugs and targeting agents and therefore lead to an improved bioavailability, sustained delivery, solubility, and intestinal absorption. Relevance for patients. This review briefly summarizes the latest innovations in therapeutic nanomedicine in lung cancer with examples on magnetic, lipid and polymer nanoparticles. Emphasis will be placed on future studies and ongoing clinical trials in this field.

21 August 2018 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNuria Romero-Laorden
Nuria Romero-Laorden
RLRebeca Lozano
Rebeca Lozano
AJAnuradha Jayaram
Anuradha Jayaram
FLFernando López-Campos
Fernando López-Campos
MSMaria I. Saez
Maria I. Saez
DODavid Olmos
David Olmos
Despite most metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients benefit from abiraterone acetate plus prednisone 5 mg bid (AA + P), resistance eventually occurs. Long-term use of prednisone has been suggested as one of the mechanisms driving resistance, which may be reversed by switching to another steroid. SWITCH was a single-arm, open-label, single-stage phase II study. The primary objective was to evaluate the antitumour activity of abiraterone acetate plus dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily (AA + D) in mCRPC patients progressing to AA + P. Clinically stable mCRPC patients who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or limited radiographic progression after at least 12 weeks on AA + P, were eligible. The primary endpoint was measured as the proportion of patients achieving a PSA decline of ≥ 30% (PSA30) from baseline after 6 weeks on AA + D. Secondary endpoints included: PSA50 response rate at 12 weeks, time to biochemical and radiological progression, overall survival, safety profile evaluation, benefit from subsequent treatment lines and the identification of biomarkers of response (AR copy number, TMPRSS2-ERG status and PTEN expression). Twenty-six patients were enrolled. PSA30 and PSA50 were 46.2% and 34.6%, respectively. Median time to biochemical and radiological progression were 5.3 and 11.8 months, respectively. Two radiological responses were observed. Median overall survival was 20.9 months. Patients with AR gain detected in plasma circulating tumour DNA did not respond to switch, whereas patients with AR normal status benefited the most. No significant toxicities were observed and PSA50 response rate to subsequent taxane was 50%. In selected clinical stable mCRPC patients with limited disease progression on AA + P, a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone can lead to PSA and radiological responses.

12 June 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFelipe Counago
Felipe Counago
FLFernando López-Campos
Fernando López-Campos
AGAna Aurora Diaz Gavela
Ana Aurora Diaz Gavela
EAElena Almagro
Elena Almagro
Esaú Fernández-PascualEsaú Fernández-Pascual
Esaú Fernández-Pascual
ECElia del Cerro
Elia del Cerro
There is clinically relevant molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer (PCa), but this biological diversity has had only a minimal impact on clinical practice. Treatment outcomes in patients with localised PCa are often highly variable, even among patients stratified to the same risk group or disease state based on standard clinical and pathological parameters. In recent years, the development of gene panels has provided valuable data on the differential expression of genes in patients with PCa. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to identify and validate prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be applied across clinical scenarios, ranging from localised disease to metastatic castration-resistant PCa. The availability of such tools would allow for precision medicine to finally reach PCa patients. In this review, we evaluate current data on molecular biomarkers for PCa, with an emphasis on the biomarkers and gene panels with the most robust evidence to support their application in routine clinical practice.

3 August 2021 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaria Antonia Gómez Aparicio
Maria Antonia Gómez Aparicio
JVJeannette Valero
Jeannette Valero
BCBegoña Caballero
Begoña Caballero
RGRafael García
Rafael García
OHOvidio Hernando-Requejo
Ovidio Hernando-Requejo
FCFelipe Counago
Felipe Counago
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men around the world. Radiotherapy is a standard of care treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Over the years, radiation delivery modalities have contributed to increased precision of treatment, employing radiobiological insights to shorten the overall treatment time, improving the control of the disease without increasing toxicities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents an extreme form of hypofractionated radiotherapy in which treatment is usually delivered in 1–5 fractions. This review assesses the main efficacy and toxicity data of SBRT in non-metastatic prostate cancer and discusses the potential to implement this scheme in routine clinical practice.