Ricardo Pérez-Tomás

Prof. Ricardo Pérez-Tomás

Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Campus de Bellvitge., Lab.5101 C./ Feixa Llarga s/n E- 08907, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2006 in Current Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
Conventional cancer chemotherapy is seriously limited by the multidrug resistance (MDR) commonly exhibited by tumour cells. One mechanism by which a living cell can achieve multiple resistances is via the active efflux of a broad range of anticancer drugs through the cellular membrane by MDR proteins. Such drugs are exported in both ATP-dependent and -independent manners, and can occur despite considerable concentration gradients. To the ATPdependent group belongs the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, which includes P-gp, MRP, BCRP, etc. Another protein related to MDR, though not belonging to the ABC transporter family, is lung resistance-related protein (LRP). All of these proteins are involved in diverse physiological processes, and are responsible for the uptake and efflux of a multitude of substances from cancer cells. Many inhibitors of MDR transporters have been identified over the years. Firstly, MDR drugs were not specifically developed for inhibiting MDR; in fact, they had other pharmacological properties, as well as a relatively low affinity for MDR transporters. They included compounds of diverse structure and function, such as verapamil and cyclosporine, and caused side effects. Secondly, the new drugs were more inhibitor-specific, in terms of MDR transport, and were designed to reduce such side effects (e.g., R-verapamil, dexniguldipine, etc.). Unfortunately, they displayed poor response in clinical studies. Recently, new compounds obtained from drug development programs conducted by the pharmaceutical industry are characterized by a high affinity to MDR transporters and are efficient at nanomolar concentrations. Some of these compounds (e.g., MS-209) are currently under clinical trials for specific forms of advanced cancers. We aim to provide an overview of the properties associated with those mammalian MDR transporters known to mediate significant transport of relevant drugs in cancer treatments. We also summarize recent advances concerning resistance to cancer drug therapies with respect to the function and overexpression of ABC and LRP multidrug transporters.

3 November 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
IPIsabel Pérez-Guillén
Isabel Pérez-Guillén
Cancer is a complex disease that includes the reprogramming of metabolic pathways by malignant proliferating cells, including those affecting the tumor microenvironment (TME). The “TME concept” was introduced in recognition of the roles played by factors other than tumor cells in cancer progression. In response to the hypoxic or semi-hypoxic characteristic of the TME, cancer cells generate a large amount of lactate via the metabolism of glucose and glutamine. Export of this newly generated lactate by the tumor cells together with H+ prevents intracellular acidification but acidifies the TME. In recent years, the importance of lactate and acidosis in carcinogenesis has gained increasing attention, including the role of lactate as a tumor-promoting metabolite. Here we review the existing literature on lactate metabolism in tumor cells and the ability of extracellular lactate to direct the metabolic reprogramming of those cells. Studies demonstrating the roles of lactate in biological processes that drive or sustain carcinogenesis (tumor promotion, angiogenesis, metastasis and tumor resistance) and lactate’s role as an immunosuppressor that contributes to tumor evasion are also considered. Finally, we consider recent therapeutic efforts using available drugs directed at and interfering with lactate production and transport in cancer treatment.

16 August 2011 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NBNathalie Busschaert
Nathalie Busschaert
MWMarco Wenzel
Marco Wenzel
MLMark Light
Mark Light
PIPaulina Iglesias-Hernández
Paulina Iglesias-Hernández
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
Philip GalePhilip Gale
Philip Gale
A series of easy-to-make fluorinated tripodal anion transporters containing urea and thiourea groups have been prepared and their anion transport properties studied. Vesicle anion transport assays using ion-selective electrodes show that this class of compound is capable of transporting chloride through a lipid bilayer via a variety of mechanisms, including chloride/H+ cotransport and chloride/nitrate, chloride/bicarbonate, and to a lesser extent an unusual chloride/sulfate antiport process. Calculations indicate that increasing the degree of fluorination of the tripodal transmembrane transporters increases the lipophilicity of the transporter and this is shown to be the major contributing factor in the superior transport activity of the fluorinated compounds, with a maximum transport rate achieved for clog P = 8. The most active transporter 5 contained a urea functionality appended with a 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group and was able to mediate transmembrane chloride transport at receptor to lipid ratios as low as 1:250000. Proton NMR titration and single crystal X-ray diffraction revealed the ability of the tripodal receptors to bind different anions with varying affinities in a 1:1 or 2:1 stoichiometry in solution and in the solid state. We also provide evidence that the most potent anion transporters are able to induce apoptosis in human cancer cells by using a selection of in vitro viability and fluorescence assays.

3 April 2013 in Accounts of Chemical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Philip GalePhilip Gale
Philip Gale
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
roberto quesadaroberto quesada
roberto quesada

1 October 2003 in Biochemical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
BMBeatriz Montaner
Beatriz Montaner
ELEsther Llagostera
Esther Llagostera
VSVanessa Soto-Cerrato
Vanessa Soto-Cerrato

1 May 2009 in Current Cancer Drug Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PGPepita Gimenez-Bonafe
Pepita Gimenez-Bonafe
Avelina TortosaAvelina Tortosa
Avelina Tortosa
Ricardo Pérez-TomásRicardo Pérez-Tomás
Ricardo Pérez-Tomás
Drug resistance remains a major clinical challenge for cancer treatment. One mechanism by which tumor cells develop resistance to cytotoxic agents and radiation is related to resistance to apoptosis. Apoptosis is a well-organised process of cell death pre-programmed inside the cell. Apoptosis can be initiated either by activation of death receptors on the cell surface membranes (extrinsic pathway) or through a series of cellular events primarily processed at mitochondria (intrinsic pathway). Apoptosis has been shown to be important for tumorigenesis and cancer treatment. Defects in apoptosis can result in the expansion of a population of neoplastic cells. However, because the death of tumor cells induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy is largely mediated by activation of apoptosis, inhibition of apoptosis will make tumor cells resistant to anti-tumor treatment. Herein, we will review the molecular changes that have the potential to cause apoptotic dysregulation, including activation of antiapoptotic factors (Bcl-2, BCLXL, Bfl1/A1 etc.), inactivation of pro-apoptotic effectors (p53, p53 pathway), and /or reinforcement of survival signals (Survivin, FLIP, NF-κB etc). Furthermore, we will discuss therapeutic intervention and/or strategies that can lower the threshold for apoptosis of tumor cells that could became useful approaches to treat cancer with special emphasis placed on the important priority to develop new cancer therapeutics toward tumor stem cells.