Juan Ignacio López-Moreno

Dr. Juan Ignacio López-Moreno

Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Campus de Aula Dei, Avda. Montañana, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2010 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
The authors propose a new climatic drought index: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). The SPEI is based on precipitation and temperature data, and it has the advantage of combining multiscalar character with the capacity to include the effects of temperature variability on drought assessment. The procedure to calculate the index is detailed and involves a climatic water balance, the accumulation of deficit/surplus at different time scales, and adjustment to a log-logistic probability distribution. Mathematically, the SPEI is similar to the standardized precipitation index (SPI), but it includes the role of temperature. Because the SPEI is based on a water balance, it can be compared to the self-calibrated Palmer drought severity index (sc-PDSI). Time series of the three indices were compared for a set of observatories with different climate characteristics, located in different parts of the world. Under global warming conditions, only the sc-PDSI and SPEI identified an increase in drought severity associated with higher water demand as a result of evapotranspiration. Relative to the sc-PDSI, the SPEI has the advantage of being multiscalar, which is crucial for drought analysis and monitoring.

17 December 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
Célia GouveiaCélia Gouveia
Célia Gouveia
J Julio CamareroJ Julio Camarero
J Julio Camarero
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
RTRicardo Machado Trigo
Ricardo Machado Trigo
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
We evaluated the response of the Earth land biomes to drought by correlating a drought index with three global indicators of vegetation activity and growth: vegetation indices from satellite imagery, tree-ring growth series, and Aboveground Net Primary Production (ANPP) records. Arid and humid biomes are both affected by drought, and we suggest that the persistence of the water deficit (i.e., the drought time-scale) could be playing a key role in determining the sensitivity of land biomes to drought. We found that arid biomes respond to drought at short time-scales; that is, there is a rapid vegetation reaction as soon as water deficits below normal conditions occur. This may be due to the fact that plant species of arid regions have mechanisms allowing them to rapidly adapt to changing water availability. Humid biomes also respond to drought at short time-scales, but in this case the physiological mechanisms likely differ from those operating in arid biomes, as plants usually have a poor adaptability to water shortage. On the contrary, semiarid and subhumid biomes respond to drought at long time-scales, probably because plants are able to withstand water deficits, but they lack the rapid response of arid biomes to drought. These results are consistent among three vegetation parameters analyzed and across different land biomes, showing that the response of vegetation to drought depends on characteristic drought time-scales for each biome. Understanding the dominant time-scales at which drought most influences vegetation might help assessing the resistance and resilience of vegetation and improving our knowledge of vegetation vulnerability to climate change.

1 April 2011 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJosé M. García-Ruiz
José M. García-Ruiz
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
TLTeodoro Lasanta–Martínez
Teodoro Lasanta–Martínez
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería

26 June 2012 in Earth Interactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
JLJorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
J Julio CamareroJ Julio Camarero
J Julio Camarero
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
In this study, the authors provide a global assessment of the performance of different drought indices for monitoring drought impacts on several hydrological, agricultural, and ecological response variables. For this purpose, they compare the performance of several drought indices [the standardized precipitation index (SPI); four versions of the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI); and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI)] to predict changes in streamflow, soil moisture, forest growth, and crop yield. The authors found a superior capability of the SPEI and the SPI drought indices, which are calculated on different time scales than the Palmer indices to capture the drought impacts on the aforementioned hydrological, agricultural, and ecological variables. They detected small differences in the comparative performance of the SPI and the SPEI indices, but the SPEI was the drought index that best captured the responses of the assessed variables to drought in summer, the season in which more drought-related impacts are recorded and in which drought monitoring is critical. Hence, the SPEI shows improved capability to identify drought impacts as compared with the SPI. In conclusion, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of the SPEI if the responses of the variables of interest to drought are not known a priori.

1 March 2018 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMartin Beniston
Martin Beniston
DFDaniel Farinotti
Daniel Farinotti
MSMarkus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel
LALiss M. Andreassen
Liss M. Andreassen
ECErika Coppola
Erika Coppola
CVChristian Vincent
Christian Vincent
The mountain cryosphere of mainland Europe is recognized to have important impacts on a range of environmental processes. In this paper, we provide an overview on the current knowledge on snow, glacier, and permafrost processes, as well as their past, current, and future evolution. We additionally provide an assessment of current cryosphere research in Europe and point to the different domains requiring further research. Emphasis is given to our understanding of climate–cryosphere interactions, cryosphere controls on physical and biological mountain systems, and related impacts. By the end of the century, Europe's mountain cryosphere will have changed to an extent that will impact the landscape, the hydrological regimes, the water resources, and the infrastructure. The impacts will not remain confined to the mountain area but also affect the downstream lowlands, entailing a wide range of socioeconomical consequences. European mountains will have a completely different visual appearance, in which low- and mid-range-altitude glaciers will have disappeared and even large valley glaciers will have experienced significant retreat and mass loss. Due to increased air temperatures and related shifts from solid to liquid precipitation, seasonal snow lines will be found at much higher altitudes, and the snow season will be much shorter than today. These changes in snow and ice melt will cause a shift in the timing of discharge maxima, as well as a transition of runoff regimes from glacial to nival and from nival to pluvial. This will entail significant impacts on the seasonality of high-altitude water availability, with consequences for water storage and management in reservoirs for drinking water, irrigation, and hydropower production. Whereas an upward shift of the tree line and expansion of vegetation can be expected into current periglacial areas, the disappearance of permafrost at lower altitudes and its warming at higher elevations will likely result in mass movements and process chains beyond historical experience. Future cryospheric research has the responsibility not only to foster awareness of these expected changes and to develop targeted strategies to precisely quantify their magnitude and rate of occurrence but also to help in the development of approaches to adapt to these changes and to mitigate their consequences. Major joint efforts are required in the domain of cryospheric monitoring, which will require coordination in terms of data availability and quality. In particular, we recognize the quantification of high-altitude precipitation as a key source of uncertainty in projections of future changes. Improvements in numerical modeling and a better understanding of process chains affecting high-altitude mass movements are the two further fields that – in our view – future cryospheric research should focus on.

1 April 2014 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
JLJorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
FEFrancisco Espejo
Francisco Espejo