Aim: To assess the sensitivity of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) with non-endorectal coil in the detection and localization of index (dominant) and non-index lesions in patients suspected of having prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: We carried-out a retrospective analysis of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of 41 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Results of MRI for detection and localization of index and non-index lesions were correlated with those of histology. Results: No statistically significant difference in size was seen between tumor lesion at histology and index lesion at MRI. In 41 patients, a total of 131 tumors were identified at histology, while bpMRI (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI) approach detected 181 lesions. bpMRI gave 27.6% false-positives and 3.3% false-negatives. Sensitivity in lesion detection by bpMRI increased with lesion size assuming high values for lesions ≥10 mm. For bpMRI and mpMRI, the sensitivity for detecting index lesions was the same and equal: 100% in the peripheral zone 97.6% and 94.7% in the entire prostate and transitional zone, respectively. Conclusion: bpMRI can be used alternatively to mpMRI to detect and localize index prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to characterize renal lesions equal to or smaller than 3.0 cm using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression by means of quantitative analysis of signal intensity.MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the MR imaging examinations of 35 patients (20 with renal cell carcinoma, eight with angiomyolipoma, and seven with complicated cysts) who were studied with spin-echo and dynamic fat-suppressed gradient-recalled echo MR sequences, before and after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Every 30 sec after contrast injection, we measured the lesion percentage of enhancement and the ratio of contrast (lesion—renal cortex signal intensity difference) to noise.RESULTS. Ten renal cell carcinomas were classified as hypervascular (enhancement greater than that of renal cortex) and 10 as hypovascular. The percentage of enhancement of hypervascular carcinomas was similar to that of renal cortex until 150 sec and greater in the late sequences (...

In the assessment of polytrauma patient, an accurate diagnostic study protocol with high sensitivity and specificity is necessary. Computed Tomography (CT) is the standard reference in the emergency for evaluating the patients with abdominal trauma. Ultrasonography (US) has a high sensitivity in detecting free fluid in the peritoneum, but it does not show as much sensitivity for traumatic parenchymal lesions. The use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) improves the accuracy of the method in the diagnosis and assessment of the extent of parenchymal lesions. Although the CEUS is not feasible as a method of first level in the diagnosis and management of the polytrauma patient, it can be used in the follow-up of traumatic injuries of abdominal parenchymal organs (liver, spleen and kidneys), especially in young people or children.

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) does not offer a precise guidance on the clinical management (biopsy or not biopsy) for PI-RADS v2 score 3 lesions. Lesion volume calculated on biparametric MRI (bpMRI) [T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)] by introducing a cut-off of 0.5 mL, allows to distinguish the lesions assigned by the multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to the category PI-RADS v2 score 3 in two subgroups: a) Indolent or low risk lesions with volume <0.5 mL, and b) Significant or high risk lesions with volume ≥0.5 mL. For mpMRI lesions assigned to PI-RADS v2 score 3, we suggest the following management: 1) Subgroup a (low-risk lesion): Clinical surveillance (accurate evaluation of age and clinical informations, periodic monitoring of prostate specific antigen value and repeated bpMRI 1 year later); 2) Subgroup b (high-risk lesion): Targeted biopsy. The proposed management would reduce the use of unnecessary biopsies and increase the diagostic yield of significant prostate cancer of approximately 50% and 30% respectively. These approach encourage the radiologist to adopt MRI lesion volume to improve PI-RADS v2 and to optimize the management of PI-RADS v2 score 3 lesions. Cite this article as: Scialpi M, Martorana E, Aisa MC, Rondoni V, D'Andrea A, Bianchi G. Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2. Turk J Urol 2017; 43: 237-40

Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (bpMRI) of the prostate combining both morphologic T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is emerging as an alternative to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to detect, to localize and to guide prostatic targeted biopsy in patients with suspicious prostate cancer (PCa). BpMRI overcomes some limitations of mpMRI such as the costs, the time required to perform the study, the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents and the lack of a guidance for management of score 3 lesions equivocal for significant PCa. In our experience the optimal and similar clinical results of the bpMRI in comparison to mpMRI are essentially related to the DWI that we consider the dominant sequence for detection suspicious PCa both in transition and in peripheral zone. In clinical practice, the adoption of bpMRI standardized scoring system, indicating the likelihood to diagnose a clinically significant PCa and establishing the management of each suspicious category (from 1 to 4), could represent the rationale to simplify and to improve the current interpretation of mpMRI based on Prostate Imaging and Reporting Archiving Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2). In this review article we report and describe the current knowledge about bpMRI in the detection of suspicious PCa and a simplified PI-RADS based on bpMRI for management of each suspicious PCa categories to facilitate the communication between radiologists and urologists. Cite this article as: Scialpi M, D’Andrea A, Martorana E, Malaspina C, Aisa MC, Napoletano M, et al. Biparametric MRI of the prostate. Turk J Urol 2017; 43(4): 401-9

OBJECTIVE. We describe our institutional experience using a simplified Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) based on biparametric prostate MRI. We discuss two important controversies: the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents and the management of PI-RADS category 3 lesions. CONCLUSION. Our simplified PI-RADS identifies four categories and suggests management strategies for each. The simplified PI-RADS can be an effective system to facilitate multidisciplinary cooperation and to improve the management of suspected prostate cancer.