E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro

Prof. Dr. E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro

Universidad de Huelva
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel
ACAleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka
VCValerio Capraro
Valerio Capraro
HSHallgeir Sjåstad
Hallgeir Sjåstad
John B. NezlekJohn B. Nezlek
John B. Nezlek
PBPaulo S. Boggio
Paulo S. Boggio
Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1,N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated self-reported factors associated with public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-May 2020). Respondents who reported identifying more strongly with their nation consistently reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies. Results were similar for representative and non-representative national samples. Study 2 (N = 42 countries) conceptually replicated the central finding using aggregate indices of national identity (obtained using the World Values Survey) and a measure of actual behaviour change during the pandemic (obtained from Google mobility reports). Higher levels of national identification prior to the pandemic predicted lower mobility during the early stage of the pandemic (r = −0.40). We discuss the potential implications of links between national identity, leadership, and public health for managing COVID-19 and future pandemics.

5 July 2022 in PNAS Nexus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTomislav Pavlović
Tomislav Pavlović
FAFlavio Azevedo
Flavio Azevedo
KDKoustav De
Koustav De
JRJulián C Riaño-Moreno
Julián C Riaño-Moreno
MMMarina Maglić
Marina Maglić
JBJay Joseph Van Bavel
Jay Joseph Van Bavel
At the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 became a global problem. Despite all the efforts to emphasize the relevance of preventive measures, not everyone adhered to them. Thus, learning more about the characteristics determining attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic is crucial to improving future interventions. In this study, we applied machine learning on the multinational data collected by the International Collaboration on the Social and Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (N = 51,404) to test the predictive efficacy of constructs from social, moral, cognitive, and personality psychology, as well as socio-demographic factors, in the attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic. The results point to several valuable insights. Internalized moral identity provided the most consistent predictive contribution—individuals perceiving moral traits as central to their self-concept reported higher adherence to preventive measures. Similar results were found for morality as cooperation, symbolized moral identity, self-control, open-mindedness, and collective narcissism, while the inverse relationship was evident for the endorsement of conspiracy theories. However, we also found a non-neglible variability in the explained variance and predictive contributions with respect to macro-level factors such as the pandemic stage or cultural region. Overall, the results underscore the importance of morality-related and contextual factors in understanding adherence to public health recommendations during the pandemic.

1 February 2021 in Enfermería Clínica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMiriam Araujo Hernández
Miriam Araujo Hernández
SNSonia García Navarro
Sonia García Navarro
E.Begoña Garcia-NavarroE.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro

10 December 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMISRAEL Macias-Toronjo
ISRAEL Macias-Toronjo
MOMaria Jesus Ocaña
Maria Jesus Ocaña
JSJosé Luis Sánchez-Ramos
José Luis Sánchez-Ramos
E.Begoña Garcia-NavarroE.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
The influence of pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and fear-avoidance attitudes towards non-specific low-back pain has been scarcely studied in an occupational insurance provider context. The objective of this work is to ascertain the relationship between these psychosocial variables with work absence, its duration and the disability of subjects with work-related low back pain. This is a descriptive observational methodological strategy. All patients with work-related non-specific low back pain who attended to an occupational health hospital during the study period were included consecutively. Clinical variables of kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance attitudes, disability and pain were collected; sociodemographic variables of sex, age, type of work, educational level, occupational status and duration in days of work absence were recorded. Kinesiophobia (b = 1.43, P = 0.011, r = 0.333), fear-avoidance beliefs in its global dimension (b = 0.910, P = 0.014, r = 0.321), fear-avoidance beliefs in its work dimension (b = 1.255, P = 0.016, r = 0.321) and pain catastrophizing (b = 0.997, P = 0.013, r = 0.340) show individual association with the duration of sickness absence. Kinesiophobia (b = 0.821, P = 0.011, r = 0.30) and fear-avoidance beliefs (b = 1.760, P = 0.016, r = 0.28) are associated with disability (Kinesiophobia, b = 0.880, P = 0.045, r = 0.26; Fear-avoidance beliefs, b = 0.724, P = 0.010, r = 0.34). Kinesiophobia, fear-avoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing are related to an increase in the duration of work absence and disability in patients with back pain in an occupational insurance provider context.

14 September 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EGEstrella Gualda
Estrella Gualda
AKAndre Krouwel
Andre Krouwel
MPMarisol Palacios-Gálvez
Marisol Palacios-Gálvez
EMElena Morales-Marente
Elena Morales-Marente
IRIván Rodríguez-Pascual
Iván Rodríguez-Pascual
E.Begoña Garcia-NavarroE.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
This article describes patterns of compliance with social distancing measures among the Spanish population during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It identifies several factors associated with higher or lower compliance with recommended measures of social distancing. This research is part of a 67-country study, titled the International COVID-19 study on Social & Moral Psychology, in which we use a Spanish dataset. Participants were residents in Spain aged 18 or above. The sample comprises 1,090 respondents, weighted to be representative of the Spanish population. Frequencies, correlations, bivariate analysis, and six models based on hierarchical multiple regressions were applied. The main finding is that most Spaniards are compliant with established guidelines of social distance during the pandemic (State of Alarm, before May 2020). Variables associated more with lower levels of compliance with these standards were explored. Six hierarchical multiple regression models found that compliance with social distance measures has a multifactorial explanation (R2 between 20.4 and 49.1%). Sociodemographic factors, personal hygiene patterns, and the interaction between personal hygiene patterns and the support for political measures related to the coronavirus brought significant effects on the regression models. Less compliance was also associated with beliefs in some specific conspiracy theories with regard to COVID-19 or general conspiracy mentality (Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire, CMQ), consumption patterns of traditional mass media (television, paper newspapers, magazines, and radio) and modern means to get informed (online digital newspapers, blogs, and social networks), political ideology, vote, trust in institutions, and political identification. Among the future lines of action in preventing the possible outbreak of the virus, we suggest measures to reinforce trust in official information, mainly linked to reducing the influence of disinformation and conspiracy theories parallel to the pandemic.

4 May 2025 in BMC Palliative Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
María José Cáceres TitosMaría José Cáceres Titos
María José Cáceres Titos
JPJuan Miguel Porras-Santana
Juan Miguel Porras-Santana
MCMaría R. Cabillas-Romero
María R. Cabillas-Romero
E.Begoña Garcia-NavarroE.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
E.Begoña Garcia-Navarro
In an increasingly globalized world, multiculturalism has transformed healthcare settings, making cultural diversity an essential component of care. In end-of-life processes, this context presents unique challenges, where care extends beyond clinical skills to involve complex, sensitive, and compassionate human interactions. This study aimed to explore the difficulties perceived by nursing professionals in palliative care when caring for culturally diverse patients. The study employed an exploratory qualitative design with a phenomenological approach to examine professional experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture detailed narratives from 11 purposely selected participants, providing a rich understanding of their lived experiences as nursing professionals. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies). The analysis identified five main themes, including linguistic and communicative barriers that hinder trust-building between patients, families, and professionals. Cultural differences in beliefs, rituals, and expectations surrounding death were also noted. Challenges related to support networks, professional profiles, and workplace settings—such as insufficient training in cultural competence and the emotional impact of caring for culturally diverse patients at the end of life—were found to influence the quality of care provided. In an increasingly multicultural world, end-of-life care should reflect the diversity it encompasses. Considering the perspectives of healthcare professionals caring for culturally diverse patients enhances the quality of care for both professionals and patients during their final moments, fostering a more inclusive and humanized care environment.