Coronary vasomotor dysfunction, comprising endotypes of coronary spasm and/or impaired microvascular dilatation (IMD), is common in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). However, there are discrepant reports regarding the prevalence of these endotypes. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with ANOCA, underlying endotypes, and differences in clinical characteristics. Prospective registry of patients with ANOCA that underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary function testing (CFT), including acetylcholine spasm testing (2-200 μg) to diagnose coronary spasm, and adenosine testing (140 μg/kg/min) to diagnose IMD, defined as an index of microvascular resistance ≥25 and/or coronary flow reserve <2.0. Of the 111 patients that completed CFT (88% female, mean age 54 years), 96 (86%) showed vasomotor dysfunction. The majority 93 (97%) had coronary spasm, 63% isolated and 34% combined with IMD. Isolated IMD was rare, occurring in only 3 patients (3%). Hypertension was more prevalent in patients with vasomotor dysfunction compared to those without (39% vs. 7%, p = 0.02). Obesity and a higher severity of angiographic atherosclerotic disease were more prevalent in patients with coronary spasm compared to those without (61% vs. 28%; 40% vs. 0%, respectively, both p < 0.01). No differences in angina characteristics were observed between patients with and without vasomotor dysfunction or between endotypes. Coronary vasomotor dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients with ANOCA, especially epicardial or microvascular vasospasm, whereas isolated IMD was rare. Performing a CFT without acetylcholine testing should be strongly discouraged.

Patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are routinely transferred to the emergency department (ED). A clinical risk score with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement might enable ambulance paramedics to identify low-risk patients in whom ED evaluation is unnecessary. The aim was to assess safety and healthcare costs of a pre-hospital rule-out strategy using a POC troponin measurement in low-risk suspected NSTE-ACS patients. This investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial was conducted in five ambulance regions in the Netherlands. Suspected NSTE-ACS patients with HEAR (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors) score ≤3 were randomized to pre-hospital rule-out with POC troponin measurement or direct transfer to the ED. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome of 30-day healthcare costs. Secondary outcome was safety, defined as 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), consisting of ACS, unplanned revascularization or all-cause death. : A total of 863 participants were randomized. Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the pre-hospital strategy (€1349 ± €2051 vs. €1960 ± €1808) with a mean difference of €611 [95% confidence interval (CI): 353–869; P < 0.001]. In the total population, MACE were comparable between groups [3.9% (17/434) in pre-hospital strategy vs. 3.7% (16/429) in ED strategy; P = 0.89]. In the ruled-out ACS population, MACE were very low [0.5% (2/419) vs. 1.0% (4/417)], with a risk difference of −0.5% (95% CI −1.6%–0.7%; P = 0.41) in favour of the pre-hospital strategy. Pre-hospital rule-out of ACS with a POC troponin measurement in low-risk patients significantly reduces healthcare costs while incidence of MACE was low in both strategies. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05466591 and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform id NTR 7346. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CI, confidence interval; ED, emergency department; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NSTE-ACS, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; POC, point-of-care

On behalf of the Dutch ACS working group, we discuss the most important changes in recommendations in the 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation relevant for both the general and interventional cardiologist.

Background and Aims: Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) identifies coronary vasomotor disorders in up to 90% of patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). The ILIAS ANOCA trial hypothesized that routine ad hoc CFT would be feasible, safe, and effective in providing an early, comprehensive diagnosis. Additionally, it was anticipated that combining CFT with a disease-specific treatment protocol would significantly improve quality of life in ANOCA patients compared with standard care. Methods: After excluding patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) during clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA), eligible patients underwent CFT and were randomized to either the standard care group, where CFT results remained blinded, or the intervention group, where CFT results were disclosed along with a tailored medical therapy protocol. The primary outcome was the mean difference in the within-subject change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQSS) between groups from baseline to a follow-up of 6 months. The trial is registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (NL-OMON20739). Results: A total of 255 patients consented, of whom 153 patients (60%) without CAD underwent CFT and were randomized 1:1 to the standard care (n = 76) or intervention group (n = 77). All CFT procedures were successful without adverse events. A vasomotor disorder was identified in 120 patients (78%). At 6-month follow-up, the SAQSS improved significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group, with an intervention effect of 9.4 units (95% confidence interval 3.9–14.9, P = .001). There were no major adverse cardiac events at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: Routine CFT during the initial ICA was feasible, safe, and had high diagnostic yield. Implementing a pragmatic CFT protocol combined with a disease-specific treatment protocol significantly improved disease-related quality of life in patients with ANOCA compared with standard care.