Howard Roberts

Dr. Howard Roberts

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

11 July 2018 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMatthew Moberg
Matthew Moberg
JBJohn Brewster
John Brewster
JNJohn Nicholson
John Nicholson
HRHoward Roberts
Howard Roberts

3 August 2020 in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSusan Bishop
Susan Bishop
HRHoward Roberts
Howard Roberts

12 November 2024 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pranit V BoraPranit V Bora
Pranit V Bora
NLNathaniel Lawson
Nathaniel Lawson
DGDaniel A. Givan
Daniel A. Givan
CACelin Arce
Celin Arce
HRHoward Roberts
Howard Roberts

1 September 2018 in Operative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPG Pinto-Sinai
G Pinto-Sinai
JBJ Brewster
J Brewster
HRHoward Roberts
Howard Roberts
SUMMARY: Objective: The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate the linear coefficient of thermal expansion (LCTE) of 12 conventional glass ionomer (GIC) and four resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorative materials. Methods: GIC and RMGI specimens (2 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm) were fabricated (n=12) following manufacturer instructions and were placed in 0.2M phosphate-buffered saline and stored at 37°C and 98% humidity for one week. Specimens had LCTE determined with a thermomechanical analysis (TMA) unit using a 15°C-50°C heating cycle as well as a 50°C-15°C cooling cycle at a 5°C/min rate, using a 3-mm ball-point probe under 0.02 N probe pressure with all specimens kept saturated with PBS using a specially designed quartz container. Each specimen was tested three times, with the mean representing the specimen LCTE. Mean results between specimen heating and cooling were compared with paired Wilcoxon sign rank test, while results between materials were compared with Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's (α=0.05). Results: GIC LCTE ranged from approximately 5°C to 20°C ppm °K−1, while the RMGI LCTE ranged from approximately 25°C to 47°C ppm °K−1. With some exception, the LCTE during cooling displayed a greater trend. Significance: Under moisture conditions similar to the oral cavity, GIC materials overall had LCTE values closer to that reported for tooth structure. RMGI materials displayed higher values, which was thought to be related to the amount of resin in the matrix. A generally greater LCTE trend with cooling for all materials was noted, but the small magnitude of the difference is presently thought to be of minor clinical significance.

31 January 2018 in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WHWyeth Hoopes
Wyeth Hoopes
SCSara Cushen
Sara Cushen
NDNicholas DuVall
Nicholas DuVall
MWMichael Wajdowicz
Michael Wajdowicz
JBJohn Brewster
John Brewster
HRHoward Roberts
Howard Roberts