Nicolas Roth

Mr. Nicolas Roth

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
FLFiorella Lucarini
Fiorella Lucarini
TKTropoja Krasniqi
Tropoja Krasniqi
GRGaëlle Bailat Rosset
Gaëlle Bailat Rosset
NRNicolas Roth
Nicolas Roth
NHNancy B. Hopf
Nancy B. Hopf
DSDavide Staedler
Davide Staedler
Restrictions on the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in consumer products led to its replacement by various bisphenol (BP) analogues, yet young children’s exposure to these analogues has been poorly characterized so far. This study aimed to characterize infants’ and toddlers’ exposure to BPA and 14 emerging BP analogues (i.e., bisphenol AF, bisphenol AP, bisphenol B, bisphenol BP, bisphenol C (BPC), bisphenol E, bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol G, bisphenol M (BPM), bisphenol P, bisphenol PH, bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol TMC, and bisphenol Z). We extracted infants’ and toddlers’ urine from diapers (n = 109) collected in Swiss daycare centers as a practical and noninvasive alternative approach to urinary biomonitoring. Bisphenols were present in 47% of the samples, with BPC and BPM being the most frequently detected (23% and 25% of all samples, respectively). The mean concentrations of urinary BPS and BPF were greater than that of BPA. This contrasts with data reported previously. Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed a significant and negative correlation between urinary BPM concentration and the population’s age. Our results provide a first characterization of infants’ and toddlers’ exposure to bisphenols in Switzerland. This knowledge can be used to support ongoing biomonitoring studies and to prioritize exposure reduction and prevention strategies.


28 October 2022 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DVDavid Vernez
David Vernez
COChristelle Oltramare
Christelle Oltramare
BSBaptiste Sauvaget
Baptiste Sauvaget
HDHélène Demougeot-Renard
Hélène Demougeot-Renard
LALothar Aicher
Lothar Aicher
ABAurelie Berthet
Aurelie Berthet
In December 2020, high soil concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) were discovered across large parts of Lausanne, Switzerland. Concentrations reached up to 640 ng TEQWHO-2005/kg dry weight. The most likely source was a former municipal waste incinerator. A three-step, multidisciplinary approach to human health risk assessment was conducted to determine the potential population exposure to PCDD/Fs and identify appropriate preventive measures. First, exposure scenarios were developed based on contaminated land uses. Second, the toxicological risks of different scenarios were evaluated using a toxicokinetic model estimating increases in blood serum PCDD/F concentrations over background concentrations from the general population's food consumption. Third, a detailed geostatistical mapping of PCDD/F soil contamination was performed. Stochastic simulations with an external drift and an anisotropic model of the variogram were generated to incorporate the effects of distance from emission source, topography, and main wind directions on the spatial distribution of PCDD/Fs in topsoil. Three main scenarios were assessed: i) direct ingestion of soil by children in playgrounds; ii) consumption of vegetables from private gardens by children and adults; and iii) consumption of food from livestock and poultry raised on contaminated soil. The worst exposure scenario involved the consumption of eggs from private hen houses, resulting in PCDD/F concentrations in serum an order of magnitude higher than might normally be expected. No relevant increases in serum concentrations were calculated for direct soil ingestion and vegetable consumption, except for cucurbitaceous vegetables. Combining mapping and exposure scenario assessment resulted in targeted protective measures for land users, especially concerning food consumption. The results also raised concerns about the potential unsafe consumption of products derived from animals raised on land with PCDD/F concentrations only moderately over environmental background levels.

11 January 2025 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAngela Bearth
Angela Bearth
NRNicolas Roth
Nicolas Roth
TJTom Jansen
Tom Jansen
LHLaura Holden
Laura Holden
AČAleksandra Čavoški
Aleksandra Čavoški
MWMartin F. Wilks
Martin F. Wilks
The traditional approaches to chemical risk assessment for human health are continuously challenged by their limitations, such as validity concerns, societal pressure to use animal-free methods, and resource constraints. New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) are considered a promising avenue toward modernisation of chemical risk assessment practices but their implementation in practice has been slow. This article aims to investigate the perspectives of human health risk assessors on the status quo, barriers and drivers of the acceptance and use of NAMs across different regulatory frameworks. A mixed method design was applied: qualitative interviews (N = 19) and an online survey with human health risk assessors from industry, regulatory agencies/institutions and academia (N = 222). The results show heterogeneity in familiarity and use of specific NAMs (e.g., QSARs as well-known and used vs. -omics approaches that are seldom used), the risk assessors' background (e.g., industry vs. regulatory agencies and institutions vs. academia) and the application context (e.g., screening/prioritisation vs. hazard identification/characterisation). The identified barriers and drivers offer pointers for the future integration and acceptance of NAMs in regulatory risk assessment. For instance, guidance documents can facilitate the use of NAMs, showcasing successful examples that increase trust in the methods and thus, the risk assessors' confidence in using these methods. Among other things, the article highlights the importance of considering human health risk assessors' needs and prerequisites to foster bottom-up coordinated efforts and to ensure the success of top-down legal and institutional change to incorporate NAMs in regulatory risk assessment.

1 July 2015 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWM.F. Wilks
M.F. Wilks
NRNicolas Roth
Nicolas Roth
LAL. Aicher
L. Aicher
MFM. Faust
M. Faust
PPP. Papadaki
P. Papadaki
GSG. Schüürmann
G. Schüürmann

8 July 2022 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VSVerena N. Schreier
Verena N. Schreier
CAChristian Appenzeller-Herzog
Christian Appenzeller-Herzog
BBBeat J. Brüschweiler
Beat J. Brüschweiler
BGBirgit Geueke
Birgit Geueke
MWMartin F. Wilks
Martin F. Wilks
NRNicolas Roth
Nicolas Roth
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) oligomers are ubiquitous in PET used in food contact applications. Consumer exposure by migration of PET oligomers into food and beverages is documented. However, no specific risk assessment framework or guidance for the safety evaluating of PET oligomers exist to date. The aim of this systematic evidence map (SEM) is to identify and organize existing knowledge clusters and associated gaps in hazard and exposure information of PET oligomers. Research needs will be identified as an input for chemical risk assessment, and to support future toxicity testing strategies of PET oligomers and regulatory decision-making. Multiple bibliographic databases (incl. Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection), chemistry databases (SciFinder-n, Reaxys), and gray literature sources will be searched, and the search results will be supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking on eligible records. The search will be based on a single-concept PET oligomer-focused strategy to ensure sensitive and unbiased coverage of all evidence related to hazard and exposure in a data-poor environment. A scoping exercise conducted during planning identified 34 relevant PET oligomers. Eligible work of any study type must include primary research data on at least one relevant PET oligomer with regard to exposure, health, or toxicological outcomes. For indexed scientific literature, title and abstract screening will be performed by one reviewer. Selected studies will be screened in full-text by two independent reviewers. Gray literature will be screened by two independent reviewers for inclusion and exclusion. Risk of bias analysis will not be conducted as part of this SEM. Will be performed by one reviewer and peer-checked by a second reviewer for indexed scientific literature or by two independent reviewers for gray literature. The extracted and coded information will be synthesized in different formats, including narrative synthesis, tables, and heat maps. Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6224302.