Regression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)–associated lymphoma with interferon (IFN)-based antiviral treatment supports an etiological link between lymphoma and HCV infection. In addition, a favorable impact of antiviral treatment on overall survival of patients with HCV-related lymphoma has been reported. Data on IFN-free regimens combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in HCV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders are scanty. We analyzed the virological and lymphoproliferative disease response (LDR) of 46 patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and chronic HCV infection treated with DAAs. The histological distribution was 37 marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs), 2 lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas, 2 follicular lymphomas, 4 CLL/small lymphocytic lymphomas (CLL/SLLs), and 1 low-grade NHL not otherwise specified. Thirty-nine patients received a sofosbuvir-based regimen and 7 patients received other DAAs. The median duration of DAA therapy was 12 weeks (range, 6-24 weeks). A sustained virological response at week 12 after finishing DAAs was obtained in 45 patients (98%); the overall LDR rate was 67%, including 12 patients (26%) who achieved a complete response. The LDR rate was 73% among patients with MZL, whereas no response was observed in CLL/SLL patients. Seven patients cleared cryoglobulins out of 15 who were initially positive. After a median follow-up of 8 months, 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-88] and 98% [95% CI, 86-100], respectively. DAA therapy induces a high LDR rate in HCV-associated indolent lymphomas. These data provide a strong rationale for prospective trials with DAAs in this setting. Publisher9s Note: There is an Inside Blood Commentary on this article in this issue. Key Points Direct-acting antiviral agents are able to induce lymphoma response in patients with HCV-associated indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The highest rate of lymphoma response (73%) was observed in patients with marginal zone lymphoma.

Objective: The benefit of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against HCV following successful treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis of individual patient data assessed HCC recurrence risk following DAA administration. Design: We pooled the data of 977 consecutive patients from 21 studies of HCV-related cirrhosis and HCC, who achieved complete radiological response after surgical/locoregional treatments and received DAAs (DAA group). Recurrence or death risk was expressed as HCC recurrence or death per 100 person-years (100PY). Propensity score-matched patients from the ITA.LI.CA. cohort (n=328) served as DAA-unexposed controls (no-DAA group). Risk factors for HCC recurrence were identified using random-effects Poisson. Results: Recurrence rate and death risk per 100PY in DAA-treated patients were 20 (95% CI 13.9 to 29.8, I ² =74.6%) and 5.7 (2.5 to 15.3, I ² =54.3), respectively. Predictive factors for recurrence were alpha-fetoprotein logarithm (relative risk (RR)=1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.01, per 1 log of ng/mL), HCC recurrence history pre-DAA initiation (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.16; p<0.001), performance status (2 vs 0, RR=4.35, 95% CI 1.54 to 11.11; 2 vs 1, RR=3.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.11; p=0.01) and tumour burden pre-HCC treatment (multifocal vs solitary nodule, RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.43; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RR between the DAA-exposed and DAA-unexposed groups in propensity score-matched patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.1; p=0.1). Conclusion: Effects of DAA exposure on HCC recurrence risk remain inconclusive. Active clinical and radiological follow-up of patients with HCC after HCV eradication with DAA is justified.

Background & Aims: HCV affects about 71 million people worldwide with 1.75 million new infections a year, mainly associated with healthcare, blood transfusion before screening of donors and drug use. Hepatitis C is a systemic disease with hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in HCV‐infected patients compared to cured or uninfected individuals.Results: The goal of eliminating hepatitis C by 2030 is based on the following three main actions: strengthening and increasing outreach screening; increasing access to treatment; and improving prevention. Although the tools and the targets of HCV elimination have now been well established, micro‐elimination, a cure in high‐risk populations, is possible, but has not been achieved. These populations are mainly migrants, prisoners, drug users, HIV co‐infected patients and psychiatric patients. New tools must be developed to achieve micro‐elimination, in particular, rapid diagnostic orientation tests for better screening, delocalization of healthcare services to improve access to care, and training physicians to raise awareness of the disease, increase understanding of its pathogenesis and provide information on the availability of safe and effective treatment to cure chronic infection and reverse hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations.Conclusion: Thus, while the goal of complete elimination of hepatitis C virus was feasible in Western countries, it was more difficult in high‐prevalence countries where improvement in the detection of chronic infection (with rapid serological and virological diagnostic tests), outsourcing of diagnostic and therapeutic care and access to direct oral antivirals are urgently needed.