Ching-Lung Tai

Prof. Ching-Lung Tai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2011 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLih-Huei Chen
Lih-Huei Chen
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
DLDemei Lee
Demei Lee
PLPo-Liang Lai
Po-Liang Lai
YLYen-Chen Lee
Yen-Chen Lee
WCWen-Jer Chen
Wen-Jer Chen
Background: Pedicle screws with PMMA cement augmentation have been shown to significantly improve the fixation strength in a severely osteoporotic spine. However, the efficacy of screw fixation for different cement augmentation techniques, namely solid screws with retrograde cement pre-filling versus cannulated screws with cement injection through perforation, remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the difference in pullout strength between conical and cylindrical screws based on the aforementioned cement augmentation techniques. The potential loss of fixation upon partial screw removal after screw insertion was also examined. Method: The Taguchi method with an L8 array was employed to determine the significance of design factors. Conical and cylindrical pedicle screws with solid or cannulated designs were installed using two different screw augmentation techniques: solid screws with retrograde cement pre-filling and cannulated screws with cement injection through perforation. Uniform synthetic bones (test block) simulating severe osteoporosis were used to provide a platform for each screw design and cement augmentation technique. Pedicle screws at full insertion and after a 360-degree back-out from full insertion were then tested for axial pullout failure using a mechanical testing machine. Results: The results revealed the following 1) Regardless of the screw outer geometry (conical or cylindrical), solid screws with retrograde cement pre-filling exhibited significantly higher pullout strength than did cannulated screws with cement injection through perforation (p = 0.0129 for conical screws; p = 0.005 for cylindrical screws). 2) For a given cement augmentation technique (screws without cement augmentation, cannulated screws with cement injection or solid screws with cement pre-filling), no significant difference in pullout strength was found between conical and cylindrical screws (p > 0.05). 3) Cement infiltration into the open cell of the test block led to the formation of a cement/bone composite structure. Observations of the failed specimens indicated that failure occurred at the composite/bone interface, whereas the composite remained well bonded to the screws. This result implies that the screw/composite interfacial strength was much higher than the composite/bone interfacial strength. 4) The back-out of the screw by 360 degrees from full insertion did not decrease the pullout strength in any of the studied cases. 5) Generally, larger standard deviations were found for the screw back-out cases, implying that the results of full insertion cases are more repeatable than those of the back-out cases. Conclusions: Solid screws with retrograde cement pre-filling offer improved initial fixation strength when compared to that of cannulated screws with cement injection through perforation for both the conically and cylindrically shaped screw. Our results also suggest that the fixation screws can be backed out by 360 degrees for intra-operative adjustment without the loss of fixation strength.

1 October 2009 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLih-Huei Chen
Lih-Huei Chen
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
PLPo-Liang Lai
Po-Liang Lai
DLDe-Mei Lee
De-Mei Lee
TTTsung-Tin Tsai
Tsung-Tin Tsai
WCWen-Jer Chen
Wen-Jer Chen

11 June 2008 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
PHPang-Hsing Hsieh
Pang-Hsing Hsieh
WCWeng-Pin Chen
Weng-Pin Chen
LCLih-Huei Chen
Lih-Huei Chen
WCWen-Jer Chen
Wen-Jer Chen
PLPo-Liang Lai
Po-Liang Lai
Background: The association of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and laminotomy has been clinically studied, but the correspondingin vitrobiomechanical studies have not been reported. We investigated the hypothesis that the integrity of the posterior complex (spinous process-interspinous ligament-spinous process) plays an important role on the postoperative spinal stability in decompressive surgery.Methods: Eight porcine lumbar spine specimens were studied. Each specimen was tested intact and after two decompression procedures. All posterior components were preserved in Group A (Intact). In Group B (Bilateral laminotomy), the inferior margin of L4 lamina and superior margin of L5 lamina were removed, but the L4–L5 supraspinous ligament was preserved. Fenestrations were made on both sides. In Group C (Laminectomy) the lamina and spinous processes of lower L4 and upper L5 were removed. Ligamentum flavum and supraspinous ligament of L4–L5 were removed. A hydraulic testing machine was used to generate an increasing moment up to 8400 N-mm in flexion and extension. Intervertebral displacement at decompressive level L4–L5 was measured by extensometerResults: The results indicated that, under extension motion, intervertebral displacement between the specimen in intact form and at two different decompression levels did not significantly differ (P> 0.05). However, under flexion motion, intervertebral displacement of the laminectomy specimens at decompression level L4–L5 was statistically greater than in intact or bilateral laminotomy specimens (P= 0.0000963 andP= 0.000418, respectively). No difference was found between intact and bilateral laminotomy groups. (P> 0.05).Conclusion: We concluded that a lumbar spine with posterior complex integrity is less likely to develop segment instability than a lumbar spine with a destroyed anchoring point for supraspinous ligament.

1 April 2010 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChin-Yu Lin
Chin-Yu Lin
YCYu-Han Chang
Yu-Han Chang
KLKun-Ju Lin
Kun-Ju Lin
TYTzu-Chen Yen
Tzu-Chen Yen
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
YHYu-Chen Hu
Yu-Chen Hu

17 November 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSheng-Hsun Lee
Sheng-Hsun Lee
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
SCSzu-Yuan Chen
Szu-Yuan Chen
CCChih-Hsiang Chang
Chih-Hsiang Chang
YCYu-Han Chang
Yu-Han Chang
PHPang-Hsin Hsieh
Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is widely used in orthopaedic surgery for both prevention and treatment of infection. Little is known about the effect of different brand combinations of antibiotic and bone cement on the elution profile and mechanical strength of ALBC. Standardized specimens that consisted of one of the 4 brands of bone cement and one of the 3 brands of vancomycin were fashioned, producing 12 combinations of ALBC. Two dosages of vancomycin in 40g bone cement were used to represent the high (4g vancomycin) and low (1g vancomycin) dose groups. Concentrations of vancomycin elution from ALBC was measured for up to 336 hours. The ultimate compression strength was tested at axial compression using a material testing machine before and after elution. In both high-dose and low-dose groups, Lyo-Vancin in PALACOS bone cement resulted in the highest cumulative elution and Vanco in Simplex P bone cement resulted in the lowest elution (458% and 65% higher in high- and low-dose groups, respectively). The mechanical strength was not significantly compromised in all groups with low dose vancomycin (range: 70.31 ± 2.74 MPa to 87.28 ± 8.26MPa after elution). However, with the addition of high dose vancomycin, there was a mixed amount of reduction in the ultimate compression strength after cement aging, ranging from 5% (Vanco in Simplex P, 81.10 ± 0.48 MPa after elution) to 38% (Sterile vancomycin in CMW, 60.94 ± 5.74 MPa after elution). We concluded that the selection of brands of vancomycin and bone cement has a great impact on the release efficacy and mechanical strength of ALBC.

1 January 2009 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPang-Hsin Hsieh
Pang-Hsin Hsieh
CTChing-Lung Tai
Ching-Lung Tai
PLPo-Chen Lee
Po-Chen Lee
YCYu-Han Chang
Yu-Han Chang