Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, becoming an unprecedented public health emergency. Rapid detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) suspected cases is crucial to control the spread of infection. We aimed to evaluate the time length of negativization from the onset of symptoms in healthcare workers (HCWs) with COVID-19, and to evaluate significant variations in cycle threshold (CT) values and gene positivity (E, RdRP, and N genes) among positive individuals who returned to work. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 182 SARS-CoV-2-positive HCWs in Milan, from 16 March to 30 April 2020. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested by RT-PCR. Results: Asymptomatic HCWs were 17.6% (32/182), and 58 healed at 30 April 2020. The median time length of negativization was 4 weeks (35% of symptomatic versus 40% of asymptomatic HCWs). Four HCWs, healed at 30 April, turned positive within three weeks during controls set up in the work unit. Three-gene positivity had the greatest variability, and increasing CT values from single- to three-gene positivity among all age groups were observed. Conclusions: Self-isolation longer than two weeks and prolonged follow-up periods for the staff returning to work after COVID-19 could be the most suitable choices to counter the SARS-CoV-2 spread. Further studies are needed to investigate infectiousness profiles among positive individuals.
Background/Objectives: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are types of bacteria that need urgent attention globally. Active surveillance programs at hospitals are essential for the early identification of CRE carriers and the timely adoption of infection control measures. We aimed to analyze the epidemiology of CRE identified by multiplex RT-PCR in rectal swabs of patients upon admission to high-risk wards and to compare data obtained from both molecular and culture CRE screening. Methods: A total of 2861 rectal swabs, prospectively collected within 12–24 h of admission, underwent molecular screening for identification of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), imipenemase (IMP), and OXA-48 (AllplexTM Entero-DR Assay). Only samples that tested positive or invalid underwent culture testing (Agar MacConkey and CHROMID® CARBA plates, bioMérieux, Craponne, France). Results: A total of 118 out of 2861 (about 4%) were positive for at least one carbapenem-resistant gene by a molecular approach (MA), with KPC, NDM, and VIM having the highest prevalence. Culture testing confirmed the presence of carbapenemase in 89 samples (75.4%), showing a disagreement rate of about 25% between the two methods, which, unfortunately, rises up to 60% for VIM. The dominant bacterial species were K. pneumoniae and E. coli (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry). Conclusions: Our data underlined the need for the molecular screening of CRE carriers in order to implement active surveillance protocol in critical care settings and to improve infection control measures.
During the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, people with CF (pwCF) were considered a clinically vulnerable population. However, data on the immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwCF are lacking. We conducted a prospective study enrolling all patients aged > 12 and who were followed-up in our CF center and received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in the period of March–October 2021. Blood samples were taken from them for the quantification of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain immediately before receiving the first dose and 3 and 6 months after the second dose. We enrolled 143 patients (median age: 21 years, range: 13–38), 16 of whom had had a previous infection. Geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) 3 months after vaccination was 1355 U/mL (95% CI: 1165–1575) and decreased to 954 U/mL (95% CI: 819–1111) after 6 months (p < 0.0001). GMT was higher among previously infected patients as compared to those naïve to SARS-CoV-2 (6707 vs. 1119 U/mL at 3 months and 4299 vs. 796 U/mL at 6 months, p < 0.0001) with no significant differences in the rate of decline over time (p = 0.135). All pwCF mounted an antibody response after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, which waned at 6 months from vaccination. Age ≥ 30 years and the use of inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower humoral response. Between the second and the third doses, nine episodes of vaccine breakthrough infections were observed.
• Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is commonly isolated from airway of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. However, to what extent NTHi persistence contributes to the lung inflammatory burden during CF chronic airway disease is controversial. Here, we aimed at determining the pathological role of NTHi persistence in a cohort of CF patients and in a newly generated mouse model of NTHi persistence. In our study cohort, we found that CF patients chronically colonized by NTHi had significantly higher levels of IL-8 and CXCL1 than those who were not colonized. To better define the impact of NTHi persistence in fuelling inflammatory response, we developed a new mouse model using both laboratory and CF clinical strains. NTHi persistence was associated with chronic inflammation of the lung, characterized by recruitment of neutrophils and cytokine release (KC, G-CFS, IL-6 and IL-17A) at 2 and 14 days postinfection. An increased burden of T cell mediated response (CD4 + and γδ cells) and higher levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9, known to be associated with tissue remodelling, were observed at 14 days post-infection. Of note we found that both CD4 + IL-17 + cells and levels of IL-17 cytokine were enriched in mice at advanced stage of NTHi chronic infection. Moreover, by immunohistochemistry we found CD3 + , B220 + and CXCL-13 + cells localized in bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue-like structures at day 14. Our results demonstrate that NTHi persistence exerts a pro-inflammatory activity in the human and murine lung, and could therefore contribute to the exaggerated burden of lung inflammation in CF patients.
During the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, people with CF (pwCF) were considered a clinically vulnerable population. However, data onimmunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwCF are lacking. We conducted a prospective study enrolling all patients aged >12 and followed-up in our CF centre, who received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in March-October 2021. They underwent a blood sample for quantification of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain immediately before receiving the first dose and after 3 and 6 months from the second dose. We enrolled143 patients (median age: 21 years, range: 13-38); of whom 16 had a previous infection. Median antibody titer (interquartile range) after 3 months from vaccination was 1288 U/mL (730-2115) and decreased to 918 U/mL (534-1488) after 6 months (P<0.0001). Median values were higher among previously infected patients as compared to those naïve to SARS-CoV-2 (9107 vs 1229 U/mL at 3 months and 4810 vs 829 U/mL at 6 months, P<0.0001) with no significant differences in the rate of decline over time (P=0.135). All pwCF mounted an antibody response after two-doses of BNT162b2 vaccine that waned at 6 months from vaccination. Age ≥30 years and use of inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower humoral response.
Background/Objectives: Syndromic multiplex PCR assays such as BIOFIRE FilmArray® Pneumonia (PN) panel enable rapid and simultaneous detection of bacterial and viral pathogens in respiratory specimens, improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, PN panel results in 410 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from hospitalized patients with suspected pneumonia were analyzed and compared with those obtained using the conventional culture (CC) method. Results: The PN panel showed an overall positivity rate of 54%, detecting bacteria in 39.0% of samples, viruses in 7.1%, and atypical bacteria in 2.2%. Using the conventional culture (CC) method, 33.9% of samples tested positive. Overall, 83 (20.2%) samples that were positive by the PN panel were negative by CC, whereas only 14 specimens (3.4%) were positive by CC and negative by PN panel. The most frequently detected pathogen by both the PN panel and CC was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 67, 16.34% for PN; n = 40, 9.76% for CC). Regarding diagnostic performance, the PN panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.02%, a specificity of 97.86%, and an overall accuracy of 97.63%. Lower sensitivity values were observed only for the Enterobacter cloacae complex (57.14%) and the Klebsiella pneumoniae group (75%). Specificity exceeded 92% for all bacterial targets. Conclusions: The PN panel confirms enhanced pathogen detection and a shortened time-to-result. It serves as a valuable adjunct for the timely diagnosis of LRTIs, supporting antimicrobial stewardship through more precise and appropriate antibiotic selection.