Olivier Levionnois

Dr. Olivier Levionnois

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2006 in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKM Knobloch
M Knobloch
CPC Portier
C Portier
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
RTR Theurillat
R Theurillat
WTW Thormann
W Thormann
MMMeike Mevissen
Meike Mevissen

1 July 2008 in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAlke K Enderle
Alke K Enderle
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
MKMatthias Kuhn
Matthias Kuhn
USUrs Schatzmann
Urs Schatzmann

1 March 2011 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKorbinian Pieper
Korbinian Pieper
TSTibor Schuster
Tibor Schuster
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
UMUlrike Matis
Ulrike Matis
ABAlessandra Bergadano
Alessandra Bergadano

1 January 2012 in Animal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRaphaël Guatteo
Raphaël Guatteo
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
DFD. Fournier
D. Fournier
DGD. Guémené
D. Guémené
KLK. Latouche
K. Latouche
PNP. Le Neindre
P. Le Neindre
Recently, the French National Institute for Agricultural Research appointed an expert committee to review the issue of pain in food-producing farm animals. To minimise pain, the authors developed a ‘3S’ approach accounting for ‘Suppress, Substitute and Soothe’ by analogy with the ‘3Rs’ approach of ‘Reduction, Refinement and Replacement’ applied in the context of animal experimentation. Thus, when addressing the matter of pain, the following steps and solutions could be assessed, in the light of their feasibility (technical constraints, logistics and regulations), acceptability (societal and financial aspects) and availability. The first solution is to suppress any source of pain that brings no obvious advantage to the animals or the producers, as well as sources of pain for which potential benefits are largely exceeded by the negative effects. For instance, tail docking of cattle has recently been eliminated. Genetic selection on the basis of resistance criteria (as e.g. for lameness in cattle and poultry) or reduction of undesirable traits (e.g. boar taint in pigs) may also reduce painful conditions or procedures. The second solution is to substitute a technique causing pain by another less-painful method. For example, if dehorning cattle is unavoidable, it is preferable to perform it at a very young age, cauterising the horn bud. Animal management and constraint systems should be designed to reduce the risk for injury and bruising. Lastly, in situations where pain is known to be present, because of animal management procedures such as dehorning or castration, or because of pathology, for example lameness, systemic or local pharmacological treatments should be used to soothe pain. These treatments should take into account the duration of pain, which, in the case of some management procedures or diseases, may persist for longer periods. The administration of pain medication may require the intervention of veterinarians, but exemptions exist where breeders are allowed to use local anaesthesia (e.g. castration and dehorning in Switzerland). Extension of such exemptions, national or European legislation on pain management, or the introduction of animal welfare codes by retailers into their meat products may help further developments. In addition, veterinarians and farmers should be given the necessary tools and information to take into account animal pain in their management decisions.

1 February 2007 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLM.P. Larenza
M.P. Larenza
MLMaría Fabiana Landoni
María Fabiana Landoni
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
MKM. Knobloch
M. Knobloch
PKP.W. Kronen
P.W. Kronen
WTW. Thormann
W. Thormann
The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

18 October 2005 in Electrophoresis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRegula Theurillat
Regula Theurillat
MKMonika Knobloch
Monika Knobloch
OLOlivier Levionnois
Olivier Levionnois
PLPaula Larenza
Paula Larenza
MMMeike Mevissen
Meike Mevissen
WTWolfgang Thormann
Wolfgang Thormann