Lei Li

Dr. Lei Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLei Li
Lei Li
JTJingqiang Tan
Jingqiang Tan
DWDavid A Wood
David A Wood
ZZZhengguang Zhao
Zhengguang Zhao
DBDirk Becker
Dirk Becker
HCHaichao Chen
Haichao Chen

16 April 2021 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QLQiao Lyu
Qiao Lyu
JTJingqiang Tan
Jingqiang Tan
LLLei Li
Lei Li
YJYiwen Ju
Yiwen Ju
Andreas BuschAndreas Busch
Andreas Busch
RHRuining Hu
Ruining Hu
This review summarizes the potential and challenges of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO 2 ) enhanced shale gas recovery and sequestration in shale reservoirs.

30 January 2020 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLei Li
Lei Li
JTJingqiang Tan
Jingqiang Tan
BSBenjamin Schwarz
Benjamin Schwarz
FSFrantišek Staněk
František Staněk
NPNatalia Poiata
Natalia Poiata
DGDirk Gajewski
Dirk Gajewski
Source locations provide fundamental information on earthquakes and lay the foundation for seismic monitoring at all scales. Seismic source location as a classical inverse problem has experienced significant methodological progress during the past century. Unlike the conventional traveltime‐based location methods that mainly utilize kinematic information, a new category of waveform‐based methods, including partial waveform stacking, time reverse imaging, wavefront tomography, and full waveform inversion, adapted from migration or stacking techniques in exploration seismology has emerged. Waveform‐based methods have shown promising results in characterizing weak seismic events at multiple scales, especially for abundant microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in unconventional and geothermal reservoirs or foreshock and aftershock activity potentially preceding tectonic earthquakes. This review presents a comprehensive summary of the current status of waveform‐based location methods, through elaboration of the methodological principles, categorization, and connections, as well as illustration of the applications to natural and induced/triggered seismicity, ranging from laboratory acoustic emission to field hydraulic fracturing‐induced seismicity, regional tectonic, and volcanic earthquakes. Taking into account recent developments in instrumentation and the increasing availability of more powerful computational resources, we highlight recent accomplishments and prevailing challenges of different waveform‐based location methods and what they promise to offer in the near future.

2 January 2024 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JZJin-Shuai Zhao
Jin-Shuai Zhao
SDShu-Qian Duan
Shu-Qian Duan
BCBing-Rui Chen
Bing-Rui Chen
LLLei Li
Lei Li
BHBen-Guo He
Ben-Guo He
GLGuo-Feng Liu
Guo-Feng Liu

6 December 2018 in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QLQiao Lyu
Qiao Lyu
JTJingqiang Tan
Jingqiang Tan
JDJeffrey M. Dick
Jeffrey M. Dick
QLQi Liu
Qi Liu
Ranjith PgRanjith Pg
Ranjith Pg
CHChenger Hu
Chenger Hu

12 October 2017 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLei Li
Lei Li
DBDirk Becker
Dirk Becker
HCHao Chen
Hao Chen
XWXiuming Wang
Xiuming Wang
DGDirk Gajewski
Dirk Gajewski
Waveform-based seismic location methods can reliably and automatically image weak seismic sources, such as microseismic events and microtremors. Besides the classical diffraction stacking operator which is based on the one-way traveltime, correlation-based imaging methods are another subcategory of waveform-based methods using differential traveltime. In this work, we systematically analyse the existing correlation-based methods and propose a novel hybrid correlation stacking method, which belongs to waveform-based relative location methods. The double differential traveltime from an event pair (i.e. a master event and a target event) to a receiver pair is used to stack the corresponding double correlation waveforms in this new approach. We generalize the correlation-based methods using a unified formula by describing cross-correlation stacking with beamforming. A thorough analysis of these imaging operators using synthetic and field data examples reveals their different characteristics of imaging resolution and level of redundancy, and a moderate level of redundancy can ensure both the accuracy and stability of correlation-based imaging methods, while an extremely high or low level of redundancy will hinder their performance in locating weak seismic events. The examples also demonstrate the potential disadvantage of using multiple phases with inaccurate velocity models for waveform-based location methods.