PURPOSE: Primary or secondary mutations in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha ( PDGFRA) underlie tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in most GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Avapritinib selectively and potently inhibits KIT- and PDGFRA-mutant kinases. In the phase I NAVIGATOR study ( NCT02508532 ), avapritinib showed clinical activity against PDGFRA D842V–mutant and later-line KIT-mutant GIST. VOYAGER ( NCT03465722 ), a phase III study, evaluated efficacy and safety of avapritinib versus regorafenib as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VOYAGER randomly assigned patients 1:1 to avapritinib 300 mg once daily (4 weeks continuously) or regorafenib 160 mg once daily (3 weeks on and 1 week off). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by central radiology per RECIST version 1.1 modified for GIST. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, safety, disease control rate, and duration of response. Regorafenib to avapritinib crossover was permitted upon centrally confirmed disease progression. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned (avapritinib, n = 240; regorafenib, n = 236). Median PFS was not statistically different between avapritinib and regorafenib (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.57; 4.2 v 5.6 months; P = .055). Overall survival data were immature at cutoff. Objective response rates were 17.1% and 7.2%, with durations of responses of 7.6 and 9.4 months for avapritinib and regorafenib; disease control rates were 41.7% (95% CI, 35.4 to 48.2) and 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7 to 52.8). Treatment-related adverse events (any grade, grade ≥ 3) were similar for avapritinib (92.5% and 55.2%) and regorafenib (96.2% and 57.7%). CONCLUSION: Primary end point was not met. There was no significant difference in median PFS between avapritinib and regorafenib in patients with molecularly unselected, late-line GIST.

SFT is an ultrarare mesenchymal ubiquitous tumor, with an incidence rate <1 case/million people/year. The fifth WHO classification published in April 2020 subdivided SFT into three categories: benign (locally aggressive), NOS (rarely metastasizing), and malignant. Recurrence can occur in up to 10–40% of localized SFTs, and several risk stratification models have been proposed to predict the individual risk of metastatic relapse. The Demicco model is the most widely used and is based on age at presentation, tumor size, and mitotic count. Total en bloc resection is the standard treatment of patients with a localized SFT; in case of advanced disease, the clinical efficacy of conventional chemotherapy remains poor. In this review, we discuss new insights into the biology and the treatment of patients with SFT. NAB2–STAT6 oncogenic fusion, which is the pathognomonic hallmark of SFT, is supposedly involved in the overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). These specific biological features encouraged the successful assessment of antiangiogenic drugs. Overall, antiangiogenic therapies showed a significant activity toward SFT in the advanced/metastatic setting. Nevertheless, these promising results warrant additional investigation to be validated, including randomized phase III trials and biological translational analysis, to understand and predict mechanisms of efficacy and resistance. While the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy remains elusive, the use of antiangiogenics as first-line treatment should be considered.

Ann Oncol 2019; (doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz124 )

Teno-synovial giant cell tumour (TGCT), also known as pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), is a rare neoplasm affecting the synovium and tendon sheaths in young adults, with recurrent translocations involving COL6A3 and CSF1 genes [1]. The fusion protein is cleaved, resulting in the overproduction of CSF1, which attracts CSF1R-expressing non-neoplastic cells (macrophages and monocytes) through a paracrine effect [1]. Complete surgical resection is not always feasible and/or may lead to functional impairment or amputation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors or antibodies, such as imatinib, pexidartinib or emactuzumab showed encouraging clinical activity in clinical studies [2–4]. CSF1 gene alteration is therefore considered as the actionable driver oncogene in PVNS.

A series of 42 patient tumors diagnosed as endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) based on the morphology but negative for JAZF1 and/or YWHAE rearrangement in FISH was analyzed by RNA-sequencing. A chromosomal rearrangement was identified in 31 (74%) of the cases and a missense mutation in known oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes in 11 (26%). Cluster analyses on the expression profiles from this series together with a control cohort composed of five samples of low grade ESS harboring a JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion, one high grade ESS harboring a BCOR-ITD, two uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, two samples each of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcomas and a series of BCOR-rearranged family of tumor (n = 8) indicated that tumors could be gather in three distinct subgroups: one mainly composed of BCOR-rearranged samples that contained seven ESS samples, one mainly composed of JAZF1-fused ESS (n = 15) and the last composed of various molecular subtypes (n = 19). These three subgroups display different gene signatures, different in silico cell cycle scores and very different clinical presentations, natural history and survival (log-rank test, p = 0.004). While YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion genes may be present in both high and low grade ESS, the high-grade presents with additional BCOR or BCORL1 gene mutations. RNAseq brings clinically relevant molecular classification, enabling the reclassification of diseases and the guidance of therapeutic strategy.