Andrey K. Belyaev

Prof. Andrey K. Belyaev

Herzen University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 March 2011 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLK. Lind
K. Lind
MAM. Asplund
M. Asplund
PBP. S. Barklem
P. S. Barklem
Andrey K. BelyaevAndrey K. Belyaev
Andrey K. Belyaev
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics

22 July 2011 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrey K. BelyaevAndrey K. Belyaev
Andrey K. Belyaev
OLOleg V. Lebedev
Oleg V. Lebedev
The branching classical trajectory method for inelastic atomic collision processes is proposed. The approach is based on two features: (i) branching of a classical trajectory in a nonadiabatic region and (ii) the nonadiabatic transition probability formulas particularly adapted for a classical trajectory treatment. In addition to transition probabilities and inelastic cross sections, the proposed approach allows one to calculate incoming and outgoing currents. The method is applied to inelastic Na + H collisions providing the results in reasonable agreement with full quantum calculations.

1 October 2003 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBP. S. Barklem
P. S. Barklem
Andrey K. BelyaevAndrey K. Belyaev
Andrey K. Belyaev
MAM. Asplund
M. Asplund
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics

26 June 2015 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YOY. Osorio
Y. Osorio
PBP. S. Barklem
P. S. Barklem
KLK. Lind
K. Lind
Andrey K. BelyaevAndrey K. Belyaev
Andrey K. Belyaev
ASA. Spielfiedel
A. Spielfiedel
NFN. Feautrier
N. Feautrier
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics

30 July 2021 in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaria Bergemann
Maria Bergemann
RHRichard Hoppe
Richard Hoppe
ESEkaterina Semenova
Ekaterina Semenova
MCMats Carlsson
Mats Carlsson
SYSvetlana A Yakovleva
Svetlana A Yakovleva
MEMonika Ellwarth
Monika Ellwarth
Motivated by the controversy over the surface metallicity of the Sun, we present a re-analysis of the solar photospheric oxygen (O) abundance. New atomic models of O and Ni are used to perform non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) calculations with 1D hydrostatic (MARCS) and 3D hydrodynamical (Stagger and Bifrost) models. The Bifrost 3D MHD simulations are used to quantify the influence of the chromosphere. We compare the 3D NLTE line profiles with new high-resolution, R|$\approx 700\, 000$|⁠, spatially resolved spectra of the Sun obtained using the IAG FTS instrument. We find that the O i lines at 777 nm yield the abundance of log A(O) = 8.74 ± 0.03 dex, which depends on the choice of the H-impact collisional data and oscillator strengths. The forbidden [O i] line at 630 nm is less model dependent, as it forms nearly in LTE and is only weakly sensitive to convection. However, the oscillator strength for this transition is more uncertain than for the 777 nm lines. Modelled in 3D NLTE with the Ni i blend, the 630 nm line yields an abundance of log A(O) = 8.77 ± 0.05 dex. We compare our results with previous estimates in the literature and draw a conclusion on the most likely value of the solar photospheric O abundance, which we estimate at log A(O) = 8.75 ± 0.03 dex.

18 May 2011 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBP. S. Barklem
P. S. Barklem
Andrey K. BelyaevAndrey K. Belyaev
Andrey K. Belyaev
MGM. Guitou
M. Guitou
NFN. Feautrier
N. Feautrier
FGF. X. Gadéa
F. X. Gadéa
ASA. Spielfiedel
A. Spielfiedel
The influence of inelastic hydrogen atom collisions on non-LTE spectral line formation has been, and remains to be, a significant source of uncertainty for stellar abundance analyses, due to the difficulty in obtaining accurate data for low-energy atomic collisions either experimentally or theoretically. For lack of a better alternative, the classical “Drawin formula” is often used. Over recent decades, our understanding of these collisions has improved markedly, predominantly through a number of detailed quantum mechanical calculations. In this paper, the Drawin formula is compared with the quantum mechanical calculations both in terms of the underlying physics and the resulting rate coefficients. It is shown that the Drawin formula does not contain the essential physics behind direct excitation by H atom collisions, the important physical mechanism being quantum mechanical in character. Quantitatively, the Drawin formula compares poorly with the results of the available quantum mechanical calculations, usually significantly overestimating the collision rates by amounts that vary markedly between transitions.