Frans Berkhout

Frans Berkhout


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2005 in Research Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAdrian Smith
Adrian Smith
ASAndy Stirling
Andy Stirling
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout

1 August 2006 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OYOran R. Young
Oran R. Young
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout
GGGilberto C. Gallopin
Gilberto C. Gallopin
MJMarco A. Janssen
Marco A. Janssen
EOElinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
SLSander van der Leeuw
Sander van der Leeuw

1 November 2015 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBruno Turnheim
Bruno Turnheim
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout
FGFrank Geels
Frank Geels
AHAndries F Hof
Andries F Hof
AMAndy McMeekin
Andy McMeekin
DVDetlef van Vuuren
Detlef van Vuuren

1 July 2016 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XBXuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai
SLSander van der Leeuw
Sander van der Leeuw
KOKaren O’bRien
Karen O’bRien
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout
FBFrank Biermann
Frank Biermann
JSJames Syvitski
James Syvitski
Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.ISI Document Delivery No.: DT0HSTimes Cited: 1Cited Reference Count: 129Bai, Xuemei van der Leeuw, Sander O'Brien, Karen Berkhout, Frans Biermann, Frank Brondizio, Eduardo S. Cudennec, Christophe Dearing, John Duraiappah, Anantha Glaser, Marion Revkin, Andrew Steffen, Will Syvitski, JamesElsevier sci ltdOxfordWhile the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd

1 April 2013 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SCSarah Cornell
Sarah Cornell
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout
WTWillemijn Tuinstra
Willemijn Tuinstra
JTJ. David Tàbara
J. David Tàbara
JJJill Jäger
Jill Jäger
LKLorrae van Kerkhoff
Lorrae van Kerkhoff
Linking knowledge with action for effective societal responses to persistent problems of unsustainability requires transformed, more open knowledge systems. Drawing on a broad range of academic and practitioner experience, we outline a vision for the coordination and organization of knowledge systems that are better suited to the complex challenges of sustainability than the ones currently in place. This transformation includes inter alia: societal agenda setting, collective problem framing, a plurality of perspectives, integrative research processes, new norms for handling dissent and controversy, better treatment of uncertainty and of diversity of values, extended peer review, broader and more transparent metrics for evaluation, effective dialog processes, and stakeholder participation. We set out institutional and individual roadmaps for achieving this vision, calling for well-designed, properly resourced, longitudinal, international learning programs

1 September 2012 in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRob Raven
Rob Raven
JSJohan Schot
Johan Schot
FBFrans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout