The COVID-19 pandemic has affected maternal and infant health globally both directly from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and indirectly from changes in health care resulting from social, economic, and health care policies unique to each country. The developing countries have to share the disproportionate burden on maternal and infant health. In this review, we discuss the uncertainties resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, vertical transmission of the virus, and its effects on breastfeeding of the newborn. The problems of families and communities caring for mothers with COVID-19 and its impact on breastfeeding in newborns are discussed. The challenges posed by the pandemic have forced us to think and devise innovative solutions, including telemedicine help for antenatal counseling, breastfeeding education, and lactation support. Optimal utilization of resources and technology to find creative solutions at the individual and the community level will help in facilitating maternal–infant bonding soon after birth. Appropriate health care policies to support pregnant and lactating mothers will go a long way in meeting healthy child development goals.

Background: Apnea of prematurity (AOP) affects preterm neonates. AOP, combined with intermittent hypoxemic (IH) events frequently prolongs the length of stay. Caffeine is the preferred medication to treat AOP and may help improve IH events. There is lack of information on the safety of discharging preterm neonates home on caffeine for AOP in the literature. Our objective was to assess safety and benefits, if any, of discharging preterm infants home on caffeine. Methods: After IRB approval, preterm infants discharged home from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on caffeine were compared with those without a discharge prescription for the period of January 2013 to December 2017. Results: A total of 297 infants were started on caffeine, and of those, 87 infants were discharged home on caffeine. There was no difference in length of stay between two groups. Duration of caffeine at home was 31 (28–42) days. The average cost of apnea monitor and caffeine at home per 30 days was USD 1326 and USD 50. There was no difference in number or reasons for emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations between two groups. Conclusion: AOP affects almost all preterm infants and along with intermittent hypoxemic events, and is one of the most common reasons for prolonged hospital stay. Discharging stable preterm infants home on caffeine may be safe, especially in those who are otherwise ready to be discharged and are only awaiting complete resolution of AOP/IH events.

Objective: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the functioning and services of academic high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) clinics throughout North America. Study Design: Prospective 25-question questionnaire survey through REDCAP links that was sent over 10 weeks, to 105 US and 10 Canadian programs. Finally, 59 of 105 US programs and 5 of 10 Canadian responses were analyzed using SAS version 9.4. Results: In the US, 67% of programs reported closures between 1–5 months, whereas in Canada 80% of programs closed for 1–3 months. In the US 86% of programs provided telemedicine visits and only 42.5% provided multidisciplinary HRIF telemedicine visits. We enumerated innovative approaches specifically for the conduct of Telemedicine visits, the need for the standardization of various tests and services in a telemedicine setting, and to emphasize the urgent need for more government funding to improve follow-up and developmental services to this fragile group of newborns.

Background: The ability to complete nipple feedings is one of the discharge criteria for most premature neonates. The Infant Driven Feeding (IDF) program suggests a system of objective promotion of oral feeds in premature infants. There is a lack of studies systematically studying the effects of IDF on the provision of breast milk. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all premature infants born before 33 weeks and birth weight of <1,500 g admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Infants on IDF were compared with those not on IDF. Results: A total of 46 infants in the IDF group and 52 in the non-IDF group met the inclusion criteria. A higher number of infants in the IDF group breastfed at first oral attempt (54% versus 12%). Forty-five percent of IDF mothers completed a full 72 hours of protected breastfeeding at the start of oral feeds, and IDF infants had earlier removal of nasogastric (NG) tube. There was no difference in the provision of breast milk and/or breastfeeding on discharge between the two groups. There was no difference in the length of stay between the two groups. Conclusion: The IDF program attempts to streamline the promotion of oral feeds in very low birth weight infants. Higher incidence of breastfeeding at the start of oral feeds and earlier removal of NG tube did not translate into higher provision of breast milk on discharge in very low birth weight infants in the IDF group. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate cue-based infant driven feeding programs and their effects on the provision of breast milk.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 has affected millions of people around the world. There is a need for data on the effects of this infection on neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care (NICU) units born to infected mothers. Here, we decided to analyze neonates born to mothers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and admitted to NICU compared with neonates who remained with their mothers. Methods: All pregnant mothers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy between 1 June 2020 and 30 June 2021, along with all neonates born to infected pregnant women, were included in this study. We then compared the neonates admitted to NICU with the neonates who remained with their mothers. Results: Eighty-eight neonates were born to eighty-eight SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers. Fifteen of these neonates were admitted to the NICU. The mothers of the neonates admitted to the NICU were more likely to have received prenatal care outside of the USA. In addition, the neonates admitted to the NICU were more likely to have needed significant resuscitation at birth. Respiratory distress was the most common reason for NICU admission. None of the NICU-admitted neonates were SARS-CoV-2-positive. There were no differences between the values of the complete blood counts, morbidities at discharge, lengths of hospitalization, or rates of readmission to hospital in the first month of life observed between the two groups. Conclusions: The vertical transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 infection remains rare; there was no difference in the hospital outcomes in the neonates of infected mothers. Unlike other studies, which show an increased tendency toward preterm birth in SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers, our study indicates no such association.