Objectives: Leptospira, the spirochaete causing leptospirosis, can be classified into >250 antigenically distinct serovars. Although knowledge of the animal host species and geographic distribution of Leptospira serovars is critical to understand the human and animal epidemiology of leptospirosis, current data are fragmented. We aimed to systematically review, the literature on animal host species and geographic distribution of Leptospira serovars to examine associations between serovars with animal host species and regions and to identify geographic regions in need of study.Methods: Nine library databases were searched from inception through 9 March 2023 using keywords including Leptospira, animal, and a list of serovars. We sought reports of detection of Leptospira, from any animal, characterised by cross agglutinin absorption test, monoclonal antibody typing, serum factor analysis, or pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis to identify the serovar.Results: We included 409 reports, published from 1927 through 2022, yielding data on 154 Leptospira serovars. The reports included data from 66 (26.5%) of 249 countries. Detections were from 144 animal host species including 135 (93.8%) from the class Mammalia, 5 (3.5%) from Amphibia, 3 (2.1%) from Reptilia, and 1 (0.7%) from Arachnida. Across the animal host species, Leptospira serovars that were detected in the largest number of animal species included Grippotyphosa (n = 39), Icterohaemorrhagiae (n = 29), Pomona (n = 28), Australis (n = 25), and Ballum (n = 25). Of serovars, 76 were detected in a single animal host species. We created an online database to identify animal host species for each serovar by country.Conclusions: We found that many countries have few or no Leptospira serovars detected from animal host species and that many serovars were detected from a single animal species. Our study highlights the importance of efforts to identify animal host species of leptospirosis, especially in places with a high incidence of human leptospirosis. We provide an updated resource for leptospirosis researchers.

Background. Legionnaires' disease cannot be clinically or radiographically distinguished from other causes of pneumonia, and specific tests are required to make the diagnosis. Currently, testing occurs erratically and, instead, clinicians rely on empiric treatment strategies and ignore public health implications of the diagnosis. We aimed to measure the increase in case detection of Legionnaires’ disease following the introduction of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of respiratory specimens. PCR is the most sensitive diagnostic tool for Legionnaires’ disease. Methods. In a quasi-experimental study in Christchurch, New Zealand, we compared the number of cases of Legionnaires’ disease requiring hospitalization diagnosed during a 2-year period before the introduction of a routine PCR testing strategy (November 2008–October 2010) with a similar period after the introduction (November 2010–October 2012). With this testing strategy, all respiratory specimens from hospitalized patients with pneumonia sent to the region's sole tertiary-level laboratory were tested for Legionella by PCR, whether requested or not. Results. During November 2008 to October 2010, there were 22 cases of Legionnaires’ disease compared with 92 during November 2010 to October 2012. Of 1834 samples tested since November 2010, 1 in 20 was positive, increasing to 1 in 9 during peak Legionella season (November to January). Increasing bacterial load was associated with increasing disease severity. Conclusions. In our region, the burden of Legionnaires’ disease is much greater than was previously recognized. Routine PCR testing provides results within a clinically relevant time frame and enables improved characterization of the regional epidemiology of Legionnaires’ disease.

Little is known about the epidemiology of human brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa. This hampers prevention and control efforts at the individual and population levels. To evaluate risk factors for brucellosis in northern Tanzania, we conducted a study of patients presenting with fever to two hospitals in Moshi, Tanzania. Serum taken at enrollment and at 4–6 week follow-up was tested by Brucella microagglutination test. Among participants with a clinically compatible illness, confirmed brucellosis cases were defined as having a ≥ 4-fold rise in agglutination titer between paired sera or a blood culture positive for Brucella spp., and probable brucellosis cases were defined as having a single reciprocal titer ≥ 160. Controls had reciprocal titers < 20 in paired sera. We collected demographic and clinical information and administered a risk factor questionnaire. Of 562 participants in the analysis, 50 (8.9%) had confirmed or probable brucellosis. Multivariable analysis showed that risk factors for brucellosis included assisting goat or sheep births (Odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 24.6) and having contact with cattle (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0, 1.4). Consuming boiled or pasteurized dairy products was protective against brucellosis (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02, 0.93). No participants received a clinical diagnosis of brucellosis from their healthcare providers. The under-recognition of brucellosis by healthcare workers could be addressed with clinician education and better access to brucellosis diagnostic tests. Interventions focused on protecting livestock keepers, especially those who assist goat or sheep births, are needed.

Leptospirosis is a major cause of febrile illness in Africa but little is known about risk factors for human infection. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate risk factors for acute leptospirosis and Leptospira seropositivity among patients with fever attending referral hospitals in northern Tanzania. We enrolled patients with fever from two referral hospitals in Moshi, Tanzania, 2012–2014, and performed Leptospira microscopic agglutination testing on acute and convalescent serum. Cases of acute leptospirosis were participants with a four-fold rise in antibody titers, or a single reciprocal titer ≥800. Seropositive participants required a single titer ≥100, and controls had titers <100 in both acute and convalescent samples. We administered a questionnaire to assess risk behaviors over the preceding 30 days. We created cumulative scales of exposure to livestock urine, rodents, and surface water, and calculated odds ratios (OR) for individual behaviors and for cumulative exposure variables. We identified 24 acute cases, 252 seropositive participants, and 592 controls. Rice farming (OR 14.6), cleaning cattle waste (OR 4.3), feeding cattle (OR 3.9), farm work (OR 3.3), and an increasing cattle urine exposure score (OR 1.2 per point) were associated with acute leptospirosis. In our population, exposure to cattle and rice farming were risk factors for acute leptospirosis. Although further data is needed, these results suggest that cattle may be an important source of human leptospirosis. Further investigation is needed to explore the potential for control of livestock Leptospira infection to reduce human disease. Leptospirosis is an under-recognized but important cause of febrile illness and death in Africa. The bacteria that cause leptospirosis have their usual life cycle in animals; humans are infected as accidental hosts. There is considerable variation between countries as to which reservoir animals and human activities are important for transmission of leptospirosis to humans. In many tropical countries flooding and rodents are the dominant sources of human infection. However, in Africa it is unknown which sources of leptospirosis are most responsible for human infection and what behaviors put people at risk for infection We performed a prospective cross-sectional study, to identify risk factors for acute leptospirosis and sources of human infection. We identified contact with cattle and work in rice fields as risk factors for acute leptospirosis. Our findings indicate that cattle may be an important source for human leptospirosis, and therefore control of leptospirosis in livestock may help prevent leptospirosis in people. Further work is needed to isolate Leptospira from humans and livestock. Rice farming was an uncommon activity in our study, but strongly associated with acute leptospirosis. Efforts are warranted to prevent infection in rice farmers living in Africa.