Daniel J. Klionsky

Dr. Daniel J. Klionsky

University of Michigan--Ann Arbor
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2008 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNoboru Mizushima
Noboru Mizushima
BLBeth Levine
Beth Levine
ACAna Maria Cuervo
Ana Maria Cuervo
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky

1 December 2009 in Annual Review of Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHCongcong He
Congcong He
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
Autophagy is a process of self-degradation of cellular components in which double-membrane autophagosomes sequester organelles or portions of cytosol and fuse with lysosomes or vacuoles for breakdown by resident hydrolases. Autophagy is upregulated in response to extra- or intracellular stress and signals such as starvation, growth factor deprivation, ER stress, and pathogen infection. Defective autophagy plays a significant role in human pathologies, including cancer, neurodegeneration, and infectious diseases. We present our current knowledge on the key genes composing the autophagy machinery in eukaryotes from yeast to mammalian cells and the signaling pathways that sense the status of different types of stress and induce autophagy for cell survival and homeostasis. We also review the recent advances on the molecular mechanisms that regulate the autophagy machinery at various levels, from transcriptional activation to post-translational protein modification.

1 April 2012 in Autophagy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
FAF C Abdalla
F C Abdalla
HAHagai Abeliovich
Hagai Abeliovich
RARobert T Abraham
Robert T Abraham
AAAbraham Acevedoarozena
Abraham Acevedoarozena
BJBrumell Jh
Brumell Jh
In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

8 February 2021 in Autophagy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
AAAmal Kamal Abdel-Aziz
Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz
SASara Abdelfatah
Sara Abdelfatah
MAMahmoud Abdellatif
Mahmoud Abdellatif
AAAsghar Abdoli
Asghar Abdoli
CTChun-Kit Tong
Chun-Kit Tong

1 December 2000 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
SEScott D. Emr
Scott D. Emr
Macroautophagy is a dynamic process involving the rearrangement of subcellular membranes to sequester cytoplasm and organelles for delivery to the lysosome or vacuole where the sequestered cargo is degraded and recycled. This process takes place in all eukaryotic cells. It is highly regulated through the action of various kinases, phosphatases, and guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases). The core protein machinery that is necessary to drive formation and consumption of intermediates in the macroautophagy pathway includes a ubiquitin-like protein conjugation system and a protein complex that directs membrane docking and fusion at the lysosome or vacuole. Macroautophagy plays an important role in developmental processes, human disease, and cellular response to nutrient deprivation.

20 January 2014 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKatherine R. Parzych
Katherine R. Parzych
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
Autophagy is a highly conserved eukaryotic cellular recycling process. Through the degradation of cytoplasmic organelles, proteins, and macromolecules, and the recycling of the breakdown products, autophagy plays important roles in cell survival and maintenance. Accordingly, dysfunction of this process contributes to the pathologies of many human diseases. Extensive research is currently being done to better understand the process of autophagy. In this review, we describe current knowledge of the morphology, molecular mechanism, and regulation of mammalian autophagy. At the mechanistic and regulatory levels, there are still many unanswered questions and points of confusion that have yet to be resolved. Through further research, a more complete and accurate picture of the molecular mechanism and regulation of autophagy will not only strengthen our understanding of this significant cellular process, but will aid in the development of new treatments for human diseases in which autophagy is not functioning properly.