Raymond Shaw

Dr. Raymond Shaw

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

59Years (1968-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2003 in Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRaymond Shaw
Raymond Shaw
▪ Abstract Turbulence is ubiquitous in atmospheric clouds, which have enormous turbulence Reynolds numbers owing to the large range of spatial scales present. Indeed, the ratio of energy-containing and dissipative length scales is on the order of 105 for a typical convective cloud, with a corresponding large-eddy Reynolds number on the order of 106 to 107. A characteristic trait of high-Reynolds-number turbulence is strong intermittency in energy dissipation, Lagrangian acceleration, and scalar gradients at small scales. Microscale properties of clouds are determined to a great extent by thermodynamic and fluid-mechanical interactions between droplets and the surrounding air, all of which take place at small spatial scales. Furthermore, these microscale properties of clouds affect the efficiency with which clouds produce rain as well as the nature of their interaction with atmospheric radiation and chemical species. It is expected, therefore, that fine-scale turbulence is of direct importance to the evolution of, for example, the droplet size distribution in a cloud. In general, there are two levels of interaction that are considered in this review: (a) the growth of cloud droplets by condensation and (b) the growth of large drops through the collision and coalescence of cloud droplets. Recent research suggests that the influence of fine-scale turbulence on the condensation process may be limited, although several possible mechanisms have not been studied in detail in the laboratory or the field. There is a growing consensus, however, that the collision rate and collision efficiency of cloud droplets can be increased by turbulence-particle interactions. Adding strength to this notion is the growing experimental evidence for droplet clustering at centimeter scales and below, most likely due to strong fluid accelerations in turbulent clouds. Both types of interaction, condensation and collision-coalescence, remain open areas of research with many possible implications for the physics of atmospheric clouds.

19 February 2010 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBEberhard Bodenschatz
Eberhard Bodenschatz
SMSzymon Malinowski
Szymon Malinowski
RSRaymond Shaw
Raymond Shaw
FSF. Stratmann
F. Stratmann
Just over 50 years ago, Henry Houghton published an essay in Science entitled “Cloud physics: Not all questions about nucleation, growth, and precipitation of water particles are yet answered” (1). Since then, understanding of cloud processes has advanced enormously, yet we still face some of the basic questions Houghton drew attention to. The interest in finding the answers, however, has steadily increased, largely because clouds are a primary source of uncertainty in projections of future climate (2). Why is our understanding of cloud processes still so inadequate, and what are the prospects for the future?

1 May 2005 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRaymond Shaw
Raymond Shaw
ADAdam J. Durant
Adam J. Durant
YMYoushi Mi
Youshi Mi

1 December 2009 in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKatrin Lehmann
Katrin Lehmann
HSHolger Siebert
Holger Siebert
RSRaymond Shaw
Raymond Shaw
The helicopter-borne instrument payload known as the Airborne Cloud Turbulence Observation System (ACTOS) was used to study the entrainment and mixing processes in shallow warm cumulus clouds. The characteristics of the mixing process are determined by the Damköhler number, defined as the ratio of the mixing and a thermodynamic reaction time scale. The definition of the reaction time scale is refined by investigating the relationship between the droplet evaporation time and the phase relaxation time. Following arguments of classical turbulence theory, it is concluded that the description of the mixing process through a single Damköhler number is not sufficient and instead the concept of a transition length scale is introduced. The transition length scale separates the inertial subrange into a range of length scales for which mixing between ambient dry and cloudy air is inhomogeneous, and a range for which the mixing is homogeneous. The new concept is tested on the ACTOS dataset. The effect of entrained subsaturated air on the droplet number size distribution is analyzed using mixing diagrams correlating droplet number concentration and droplet size. The data suggest that homogeneous mixing is more likely to occur in the vicinity of the cloud core, whereas inhomogeneous mixing dominates in more diluted cloud regions. Paluch diagrams are used to support this hypothesis. The observations suggest that homogeneous mixing is favored when the transition length scale exceeds approximately 10 cm. Evidence was found that suggests that under certain conditions mixing can lead to enhanced droplet growth such that the largest droplets are found in the most diluted cloud regions.

28 November 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKamal Kant Chandrakar
Kamal Kant Chandrakar
WCWill Cantrell
Will Cantrell
KCKelken Chang
Kelken Chang
DCDavid Ciochetto
David Ciochetto
DNDennis Niedermeier
Dennis Niedermeier
Fan YangFan Yang
Fan Yang
The influence of aerosol concentration on the cloud-droplet size distribution is investigated in a laboratory chamber that enables turbulent cloud formation through moist convection. The experiments allow steady-state microphysics to be achieved, with aerosol input balanced by cloud-droplet growth and fallout. As aerosol concentration is increased, the cloud-droplet mean diameter decreases, as expected, but the width of the size distribution also decreases sharply. The aerosol input allows for cloud generation in the limiting regimes of fast microphysics ( <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>τc<τt ) for high aerosol concentration, and slow microphysics ( <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>></mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>τc>τt ) for low aerosol concentration; here, <mml:math><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>τc is the phase-relaxation time and <mml:math><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>τt is the turbulence-correlation time. The increase in the width of the droplet size distribution for the low aerosol limit is consistent with larger variability of supersaturation due to the slow microphysical response. A stochastic differential equation for supersaturation predicts that the standard deviation of the squared droplet radius should increase linearly with a system time scale defined as <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>τs−1=τc−1+τt−1 , and the measurements are in excellent agreement with this finding. The result underscores the importance of droplet size dispersion for aerosol indirect effects: increasing aerosol concentration changes the albedo and suppresses precipitation formation not only through reduction of the mean droplet diameter but also by narrowing of the droplet size distribution due to reduced supersaturation fluctuations. Supersaturation fluctuations in the low aerosol/slow microphysics limit are likely of leading importance for precipitation formation.

27 October 2005 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAdam J. Durant
Adam J. Durant
RSRaymond Shaw
Raymond Shaw