Pedro Vieira-Baptista

Dr. Pedro Vieira-Baptista

Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Research in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gilbert DondersGilbert Donders
Gilbert Donders
GBGert Bellen
Gert Bellen
SGSvitrigaile Grinceviciene
Svitrigaile Grinceviciene
KRKateryna Ruban
Kateryna Ruban
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista

29 June 2017 in Climacteric
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPF. R. Pérez-López
F. R. Pérez-López
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista
Female lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory dermatitis, with a predilection for the anogenital area, which in some cases can become seriously distorted (atrophy of the labia minora, phimosis, introital stenosis, etc.). Most cases are diagnosed in postmenopausal women, but it can affect women of any age. Lichen sclerosus is usually a pruriginous condition, although it can also be asymptomatic. It is associated with an increased risk of vulvar cancer, even though it is not a premalignant condition itself. The true precursor of cancer associated with lichen sclerosus is vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, differentiated type. The diagnosis is usually clinical, but in some cases a biopsy can be performed, especially to exclude vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer. The treatment of lichen sclerosus aims at controlling the symptoms, stopping further scarring and distortion and reducing the risk of cancer. The gold standard in treatment is ultra-potent topical steroids (clobetasol propionate). Second-line treatments include calcineurin inhibitors, retinoids, and immunosuppressors. Surgery is used only for the treatment of complications associated with lichen sclerosus. Follow-up must be kept indefinitely.

1 January 2022 in Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAhinoam Lev-Sagie
Ahinoam Lev-Sagie
FSfrancesco de seta
francesco de seta
HVHans Verstraelen
Hans Verstraelen
GVGary Ventolini
Gary Ventolini
RLRisa Lonnee-Hoffmann
Risa Lonnee-Hoffmann
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista
Objective: This series of articles, titled The Vaginal Microbiome (VMB), written on behalf of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, aims to summarize the recent findings and understanding of the vaginal bacterial microbiota, mainly regarding areas relevant to clinicians specializing in vulvovaginal disorders. Materials and Methods: A search of PubMed database was performed, using the search terms “vaginal microbiome” with “dysbiosis,” “bacterial vaginosis,” “cytolytic vaginosis,” “desquamative inflammatory vaginitis,” and “aerobic vaginitis.” Full article texts were reviewed. Reference lists were screened for additional articles. Results: The second article in this series focuses on vaginal dysbiotic conditions. Dysbiosis is a term describing imbalances in bacterial communities. Given that lactobacillus-dominated microbiota are thought to be the most optimal, vaginal dysbiosis is usually considered as lactobacilli-depleted VMB. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), the most common vaginal dysbiotic condition, is a polymicrobial disorder, considered the leading cause for vaginal discharge in women worldwide. In addition, we review the VMB in other vaginal conditions associated with lactobacilli depletion: desquamative inflammatory vaginitis and aerobic vaginitis. We also discuss the controversial diagnosis of cytolytic vaginosis, related with lactobacilli overgrowth. Conclusions: Bacterial vaginosis displays complex microbiology. The heterogeneity and diversity within the genus Gardnerella may impact the progression of BV. Bacterial biofilms may contribute to the etiology and persistence of BV, and various bacteria may affect its clinical presentation and pathogenicity. Lack of lactobacilli is not always accompanied by an overgrowth of anaerobes.

23 March 2023 in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vesna KesicVesna Kesic
Vesna Kesic
XCXavier Carcopino
Xavier Carcopino
MPMARIO PRETI
MARIO PRETI
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista
FBFederica Bevilacqua
Federica Bevilacqua
CSColleen Stockdale
Colleen Stockdale
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) developed consensus statements on pre-invasive vulvar lesions in order to improve the quality of care for patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). The management of VaIN varies according to the grade of the lesion: VaIN 1 (low grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL)) can be subjected to follow-up, while VaIN 2–3 (high-grade vaginal SIL) should be treated. Treatment needs individualization according to the patient’s characteristics, disease extension and previous therapeutic procedures. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and should be performed if invasion cannot be excluded. Total vaginectomy is used only in highly selected cases of extensive and persistent disease. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser may be used as both an ablation method and an excisional one. Reported cure rates after laser excision and laser ablation are similar. Topical agents are useful for persistent, multifocal lesions or for patients who cannot undergo surgical treatment. Imiquimod was associated with the lowest recurrence rate, highest human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, and can be considered the best topical approach. Trichloroacetic acid and 5-fluorouracil are historical options and should be discouraged. For VaIN after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, laser vaporization and topical agents are not the best options, since they cannot reach epithelium buried in the vaginal scar. In these cases surgical options are preferable. Brachytherapy has a high overall success rate but due to late side effects should be reserved for poor surgical candidates, having multifocal disease, and with failed prior treatments. VaIN tends to recur and ensuring patient adherence to close follow-up visits is of the utmost importance. The first evaluation should be performed at 6 months with cytology and an HPV test during 2 years and annually thereafter. The implementation of vaccination against HPV infection is expected to contribute to the prevention of VaIN and thus cancer of the vagina. The effects of treatment can have an impact on quality of life and result in psychological and psychosexual issues which should be addressed. Patients with VaIN need clear and up-to-date information on a range of treatment options including risks and benefits, as well as the need for follow-up and the risk of recurrence.

10 March 2022 in Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista
FPFaustino R. Pérez-López
Faustino R. Pérez-López
MLMaría T. López-Baena
María T. López-Baena
CSColleen K. Stockdale
Colleen K. Stockdale
MPMario Preti
Mario Preti
JBJacob Md Bornstein
Jacob Md Bornstein
Objective: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) and possibly vulvar lichen planus (VLP) are associated with an increased vulvar cancer (VC) risk. We analyzed the risk of VC and its precursors after a diagnosis of VLS or VLP. Materials and Methods: A search was performed to identify articles describing the development of vulvar neoplasia in women with VLS or VLP. This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO database. Results: Fourteen studies on VLS included 14,030 women without a history of vulvar neoplasia. Vulvar cancer, differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion occurred in 2.2% (314/14,030), 1.2% (50/4,175), and 0.4% (2/460), respectively. Considering women with previous or current VC, the rate was 4.0% (580/14,372). In one study, dVIN preceded VC in 52.0% of the cases. Progression of dVIN to VC was 18.1% (2/11). The risk was significantly higher in the first 1–3 years after a biopsy of VLS and with advancing age; it significantly decreased with ultrapotent topical steroid use. For the 14,268 women with VLP (8 studies), the rates of VC, dVIN, and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion were 0.3% (38/14,268), 2.5% (17/689), and 1.4% (10/711), respectively. Conclusions: Vulvar lichen sclerosus is associated with an increased risk of VC, especially in the presence of dVIN and with advancing age. Ultrapotent topical steroids seem to reduce this risk. An increased risk of developing VC has been suggested for VLP. Hence, treatment and regular life-long follow-up should be offered to women with VLS or VLP.

11 February 2019 in Neurourology and Urodynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMARIO PRETI
MARIO PRETI
PVPedro Vieira-Baptista
Pedro Vieira-Baptista
GDGiuseppe Alessandro Digesu
Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu
CBCarol Emi Bretschneider
Carol Emi Bretschneider
MDMargot Damaser
Margot Damaser
CSColleen Kennedy Stockdale
Colleen Kennedy Stockdale