Gary John Hooper

Prof. Gary John Hooper

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2020 in Advanced Healthcare Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XCXiaolin Cui
Xiaolin Cui
JLJun Li
Jun Li
YHYusak Hartanto
Yusak Hartanto
MDMitchell Durham
Mitchell Durham
JTJunnan Tang
Junnan Tang
TWTim Woodfield
Tim Woodfield

12 August 2016 in ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Khoon LimKhoon Lim
Khoon Lim
BSBenjamin S. Schon
Benjamin S. Schon
NMNaveen V. Mekhileri
Naveen V. Mekhileri
GBGabriella C. J. Brown
Gabriella C. J. Brown
CCCatherine M. Chia
Catherine M. Chia
TWTim Woodfield
Tim Woodfield

17 October 2017 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSarah Bertlein
Sarah Bertlein
GBGabriella Brown
Gabriella Brown
Khoon LimKhoon Lim
Khoon Lim
JTJungst Tomasz
Jungst Tomasz
TBThomas Boeck
Thomas Boeck
JGJürgen Groll
Jürgen Groll

26 April 2019 in Macromolecular Bioscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Khoon LimKhoon Lim
Khoon Lim
BKBarbara J. Klotz
Barbara J. Klotz
GLGabriella C. J. Lindberg
Gabriella C. J. Lindberg
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
GHGary John Hooper
Gary John Hooper
TWTim Woodfield
Tim Woodfield

1 January 2011 in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GHGary John Hooper
Gary John Hooper
ARA. G. Rothwell
A. G. Rothwell
CFC. Frampton
C. Frampton
MWM. C. Wyatt
M. C. Wyatt
We have investigated whether the use of laminar-flow theatres and space suits reduced the rate of revision for early deep infection after total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement by reviewing the results of the New Zealand Joint Registry at ten years. Of the 51 485 primary THRs and 36 826 primary TKRs analysed, laminar-flow theatres were used in 35.5% and space suits in 23.5%. For THR there was a significant increase in early infection in those procedures performed with the use of a space suit compared with those without (p < 0.0001), in those carried out in a laminar-flow theatre compared with a conventional theatre (p < 0.003) and in those undertaken in a laminar-flow theatre with a space suit (p < 0.001) when compared with conventional theatres without such a suit. The results were similar for TKR with the use of a space suit (p < 0.001), in laminar-flow theatres (p < 0.019) and when space suits were used in those theatres (p < 0.001). These findings were independent of age, disease and operating time and were unchanged when the surgeons and hospital were analysed individually. The rate of revision for early deep infection has not been reduced by using laminar flow and space suits. Our results question the rationale for their increasing use in routine joint replacement, where the added cost to the health system seems to be unjustified.

1 January 2018 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNaveen Vijayan Mekhileri
Naveen Vijayan Mekhileri
Khoon LimKhoon Lim
Khoon Lim
GBGabriella C J Brown
Gabriella C J Brown
Isha MutrejaIsha Mutreja
Isha Mutreja
BSBen S Schon
Ben S Schon
TWTim Woodfield
Tim Woodfield
Bottom-up biofabrication approaches combining micro-tissue fabrication techniques with extrusion-based 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer scaffolds are emerging strategies in tissue engineering. These biofabrication strategies support native self-assembly mechanisms observed in developmental stages of tissue or organoid growth as well as promoting cell-cell interactions and cell differentiation capacity. Few technologies have been developed to automate the precise assembly of micro-tissues or tissue modules into structural scaffolds. We describe an automated 3D bioassembly platform capable of fabricating simple hybrid constructs via a two-step bottom-up bioassembly strategy, as well as complex hybrid hierarchical constructs via a multistep bottom-up bioassembly strategy. The bioassembly system consisted of a fluidic-based singularisation and injection module incorporated into a commercial 3D bioprinter. The singularisation module delivers individual micro-tissues to an injection module, for insertion into precise locations within a 3D plotted scaffold. To demonstrate applicability for cartilage tissue engineering, human chondrocytes were isolated and micro-tissues of 1 mm diameter were generated utilising a high throughput 96-well plate format. Micro-tissues were singularised with an efficiency of 96.0 ± 5.1%. There was no significant difference in size, shape or viability of micro-tissues before and after automated singularisation and injection. A layer-by-layer approach or aforementioned bottom-up bioassembly strategy was employed to fabricate a bilayered construct by alternatively 3D plotting a thermoplastic (PEGT/PBT) polymer scaffold and inserting pre-differentiated chondrogenic micro-tissues or cell-laden gelatin-based (GelMA) hydrogel micro-spheres, both formed via high-throughput fabrication techniques. No significant difference in viability between the construct assembled utilising the automated bioassembly system and manually assembled construct was observed. Bioassembly of pre-differentiated micro-tissues as well as chondrocyte-laden hydrogel micro-spheres demonstrated the flexibility of the platform while supporting tissue fusion, long-term cell viability, and deposition of cartilage-specific extracellular matrix proteins. This technology provides an automated and scalable pathway for bioassembly of both simple and complex 3D tissue constructs of clinically relevant shape and size, with demonstrated capability to facilitate direct spatial organisation and hierarchical 3D assembly of micro-tissue modules, ranging from biomaterial free cell pellets to cell-laden hydrogel formulations.