Background There is an increasing interest in local tumor ablative treatment modalities that induce immunogenic cell death and the generation of antitumor immune responses. Methods We report six recurrent glioblastoma patients who were treated with intracavitary thermotherapy after coating the resection cavity wall with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (“NanoPaste” technique). Patients underwent six 1-h hyperthermia sessions in an alternating magnetic field and, if possible, received concurrent fractionated radiotherapy at a dose of 39.6 Gy. Results There were no major side effects during active treatment. However, after 2–5 months, patients developed increasing clinical symptoms. CT scans showed tumor flare reactions with prominent edema around nanoparticle deposits. Patients were treated with dexamethasone and, if necessary, underwent re-surgery to remove nanoparticles. Histopathology revealed sustained necrosis directly adjacent to aggregated nanoparticles without evidence for tumor activity. Immunohistochemistry showed upregulation of Caspase-3 and heat shock protein 70, prominent infiltration of macrophages with ingested nanoparticles and CD3⁺ T-cells. Flow cytometric analysis of freshly prepared tumor cell suspensions revealed increased intracellular ratios of IFN-γ to IL-4 in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ memory T cells, and activation of tumor-associated myeloid cells and microglia with upregulation of HLA-DR and PD-L1. Two patients had long-lasting treatment responses > 23 months without receiving any further therapy. Conclusion Intracavitary thermotherapy combined with radiotherapy can induce a prominent inflammatory reaction around the resection cavity which might trigger potent antitumor immune responses possibly leading to long-term stabilization of recurrent GBM patients. These results warrant further investigations in a prospective phase-I trial.

With the release of the 2016 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors, brain invasion in meningiomas has been added as a stand-alone criterion for atypia and can therefore impact grading and indirectly adjuvant therapy. Regarding this rising clinical importance, we have reviewed the current knowledge about brain invasion with emphasis on its implications on current and future clinical practice. We found various definitions of brain invasion and approaches for evaluation in surgically obtained specimens described over the past decades. This heterogeneity is reflected by weak correlation with prognosis and remains controversial. Similarly, associated clinical factors are largely unknown. Preoperative, imaging-guided detection of brain invasion is unspecific, and intraoperative assessment using standard and new high-magnification microscopic techniques remains imprecise. Despite the increasing knowledge about molecular alterations of the tumor/ brain surface, pharmacotherapeutic options targeting brain invasive meningiomas are lacking. Finally, we summarize the impact of brain invasion on histopathological grading in the WHO classifications of brain tumors since 1979. In conclusion, standardized neurosurgical sampling and neuropathological analyses could improve diagnostic reliability and reproducibility of future studies. Further research is needed to improve pre- and intraoperative visualization of brain invasion and to develop adjuvant, targeted therapies.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of risk factors for perioperative epilepsy remains crucial in the care of patients with meningioma. Moreover, associations of brain invasion with clinical and radiological variables have been largely unexplored. The authors hypothesized that invasion of the cortex and subsequent increased edema facilitate seizures, and they compared radiological data and perioperative seizures in patients with brain-invasive or noninvasive meningioma.METHODS: Correlations of brain invasion with tumor and edema volumes and preoperative and postoperative seizures were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: Totals of 108 (61%) females and 68 (39%) males with a median age of 60 years and harboring totals of 92 (52%) grade I, 79 (45%) grade II, and 5 (3%) grade III tumors were included. Brain invasion was found in 38 (22%) patients and was absent in 138 (78%) patients. The tumors were located at the convexity in 72 (41%) patients, at the falx cerebri in 26 (15%), at the skull base in 69 (39%), in the posterior fossa in 7 (4%), and in the ventricle in 2 (1%); the median tumor and edema volumes were 13.73 cm³ (range 0.81–162.22 cm³) and 1.38 cm³ (range 0.00–355.80 cm³), respectively. As expected, edema volume increased with rising tumor volume (p < 0.001). Brain invasion was independent of tumor volume (p = 0.176) but strongly correlated with edema volume (p < 0.001). The mean edema volume in noninvasive tumors was 33.0 cm³, but in invasive tumors, it was 130.7 cm³ (p = 0.008). The frequency of preoperative seizures was independent of the patients’ age, sex, and tumor location; however, the frequency was 32% (n = 12) in patients with invasive meningioma and 15% (n = 21) in those with noninvasive meningioma (p = 0.033). In contrast, the probability of detecting brain invasion microscopically was increased more than 2-fold in patients with a history of preoperative seizures (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.13–5.88; p = 0.025). In univariate analyses, the rate of preoperative seizures correlated slightly with tumor volume (p = 0.049) but strongly with edema volume (p = 0.014), whereas seizure semiology was found to be independent of brain invasion (p = 0.211). In multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, tumor and edema volumes, and WHO grade, rising tumor volume (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.03; p = 0.042) and especially brain invasion (OR 5.26, 95% CI 1.52–18.15; p = 0.009) were identified as independent predictors of preoperative seizures. Nine (5%) patients developed new seizures within a median follow-up time of 15 months after surgery. Development of postoperative epilepsy was independent of all clinical variables, including Simpson grade (p = 0.133), tumor location (p = 0.936), brain invasion (p = 0.408), and preoperative edema volume (p = 0.081), but was correlated with increasing preoperative tumor volume (p = 0.004). Postoperative seizure-free rates were similar among patients with invasive and those with noninvasive meningioma (p = 0.372).CONCLUSIONS: Brain invasion was identified as a new and strong predictor for preoperative, but not postoperative, seizures. Although also associated with increased peritumoral edema, seizures in patients with invasive meningioma might be facilitated substantially by cortical invasion itself. Consideration of seizures in consultations between the neurosurgeon and neuropathologist can improve the microscopic detection of brain invasion.