Su A. Park

Dr. Su A. Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2010 in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park
SLSu Hee Lee
Su Hee Lee
WKWan Doo Kim
Wan Doo Kim

1 August 2016 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSang Jin Lee
Sang Jin Lee
DLDonghyun Lee
Donghyun Lee
TYTaek Rim Yoon
Taek Rim Yoon
HKHyung Keun Kim
Hyung Keun Kim
HJHa Hyeon Jo
Ha Hyeon Jo
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park

23 November 2019 in Nanoscale
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGoeun Choe
Goeun Choe
SOSeulgi Oh
Seulgi Oh
JSJi Min Seok
Ji Min Seok
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park
JLJae Young Lee
Jae Young Lee
Three-dimensional (3D) cell printing is a versatile technique enabling the creation of 3D constructs containing hydrogel and cells in the desired shape or pattern. Bioinks exhibiting appropriate mechanical properties and biological activities to support cell growth and/or differentiation toward a specific lineage play critical roles in 3D cell printing and tissue engineering applications. Herein, we explored alginate/graphene oxide (GO) composites as bioinks for their potential to improve printability, structural stability, and osteogenic activities for osteogenic tissue engineering applications. The addition of GO (0.05–1.0 mg mL−1) to 3% alginate significantly enhanced the printing performances of the alginate bioink. In addition, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) printed with alginate/GO showed good proliferation and higher survival in an oxidative stress environment. The 3D scaffolds printed with MSCs and alginate/GO demonstrated significantly enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with those printed with MSCs and alginate. Overall, a bioink of 3% alginate and 0.5 mg mL−1 GO showed the most balanced characteristics in terms of printability, structural stability, and osteogenic induction of the printed MSCs. Alginate/GO composite bioinks will be useful for bioprinting research for various tissue engineering applications.

1 February 2017 in Materials Science and Engineering: C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJisun Park
Jisun Park
SLSang Jin Lee
Sang Jin Lee
SCSolchan Chung
Solchan Chung
JLJun Hee Lee
Jun Hee Lee
WKWan Doo Kim
Wan Doo Kim
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park

1 December 2019 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSang Jin Lee
Sang Jin Lee
HJHa Hyeon Jo
Ha Hyeon Jo
KLKyung Seob Lim
Kyung Seob Lim
DLDohyung Lim
Dohyung Lim
SLSoojin Lee
Soojin Lee
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park

11 December 2020 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJUNJIE YU
JUNJIE YU
SPSu A. Park
Su A. Park
WKWan Doo Kim
Wan Doo Kim
THTaeho Ha
Taeho Ha
YXYuan-Zhu Xin
Yuan-Zhu Xin
Donghyun LeeDonghyun Lee
Donghyun Lee
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has emerged as a powerful biofabrication platform for tissue engineering because of its ability to engineer living cells and biomaterial-based 3D objects. Over the last few decades, droplet-based, extrusion-based, and laser-assisted bioprinters have been developed to fulfill certain requirements in terms of resolution, cell viability, cell density, etc. Simultaneously, various bio-inks based on natural–synthetic biomaterials have been developed and applied for successful tissue regeneration. To engineer more realistic artificial tissues/organs, mixtures of bio-inks with various recipes have also been developed. Taken together, this review describes the fundamental characteristics of the existing bioprinters and bio-inks that have been currently developed, followed by their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, various tissue engineering applications using 3D bioprinting are briefly introduced.