Johnell Brooks

Dr. Johnell Brooks

Clemson University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2010 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
RGRichard R. Goodenough
Richard R. Goodenough
MCMatthew C. Crisler
Matthew C. Crisler
NKNathan D. Klein
Nathan D. Klein
RARebecca L. Alley
Rebecca L. Alley
RWRebekkah F. Wills
Rebekkah F. Wills

1 May 2011 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
MCMatthew C. Crisler
Matthew C. Crisler
NKNathan Klein
Nathan Klein
RGRichard Goodenough
Richard Goodenough
RBRebekkah W. Beeco
Rebekkah W. Beeco
CBChristine Beck
Christine Beck

1 August 2005 in Optometry and Vision Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
RTRichard A. Tyrrell
Richard A. Tyrrell
TFTalissa A. Frank
Talissa A. Frank

7 April 2016 in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
JKJulie Kellett
Julie Kellett
JSJulia Seeanner
Julia Seeanner
CJCasey Jenkins
Casey Jenkins
CBCaroline Buchanan
Caroline Buchanan
SPSusan Pierce
Susan Pierce

1 September 2023 in Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRakesh Gangadharaiah
Rakesh Gangadharaiah
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
PRPatrick Rosopa
Patrick Rosopa
HSHaotian Su
Haotian Su
LBLisa Boor
Lisa Boor
YJYunyi Jia
Yunyi Jia
Due to the advancements in real-time information communication technologies and sharing economies, rideshare services have gained significant momentum by offering dynamic and/or on-demand services. Rideshare service companies evolved from personal rideshare, where riders traveled solo or with known individuals, into pooled rideshare (PR), where riders can travel with one to multiple unknown riders. Similar to other shared economy services, pooled rideshare is beneficial as it efficiently utilizes resources, resulting in reduced energy usage, as well as reduced costs for the riders. However, previous research has demonstrated that riders have concerns about using pooled rideshare, especially regarding personal safety. A U.S. national survey with 5385 participants was used to understand human factor-related barriers and user preferences to develop a novel Pooled Rideshare Acceptance Model (PRAM). This model used a covariance-based structural equation model (CB-SEM) to identify the relationships between willingness to consider PR factors (time/cost, privacy, safety, service experience, and traffic/environment) and optimizing one’s experience of PR factors (vehicle technology/accessibility, convenience, comfort/ease of use, and passenger safety), resulting in the higher-order factor trust service. We examined the factors’ relative contribution to one’s willingness/attitude towards PR and user acceptance of PR. Privacy, safety, trust service, and convenience were statistically significant factors in the model, as were the comfort/ease of use factor and the service experience, traffic/environment, and passenger safety factors. The only two non-significant factors in the model were time/cost and vehicle technology/accessibility; it is only when a rider feels safe that individuals then consider the additional non-significant variables of time, cost, technology, and accessibility. Privacy, safety, and service experience were factors that discouraged the use of PR, whereas the convenience factor greatly encouraged the acceptance of PR. Despite the time/cost factor’s lack of significance, individual items related to time and cost were crucial when viewed within the context of convenience. This highlights that while user perceptions of privacy and safety are paramount to their attitude towards PR, once safety concerns are addressed, and services are deemed convenient, time and cost elements significantly enhance their trust in pooled rideshare services. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of user acceptance of PR services and offers actionable insights for policymakers and rideshare companies to improve their services and increase user adoption.

26 May 2023 in Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRakesh Gangadharaiah
Rakesh Gangadharaiah
HSHaotian Su
Haotian Su
ERElenah Rosopa
Elenah Rosopa
JBJohnell Brooks
Johnell Brooks
KKKristin Kolodge
Kristin Kolodge
YJYunyi Jia
Yunyi Jia
The rise of real-time information communication through smartphones and wireless networks enabled the growth of ridesharing services. While personal rideshare services (individuals riding alone or with acquaintances) initially dominated the market, the popularity of pooled ridesharing (individuals sharing rides with people they do not know) has grown globally. However, pooled ridesharing remains less common in the U.S., where personal vehicle usage is still the norm. Vehicle design and rideshare services may need to be tailored to user preferences to increase pooled rideshare adoption. Based on a large, national U.S. survey (N = 5385), the results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested that four key factors influence riders’ willingness to consider pooled ridesharing: comfort/ease of use, convenience, vehicle technology/accessibility, and passenger safety. A binomial logistic regression was conducted to determine how the four factors influence one’s willingness to consider pooled ridesharing. The two factors that positively influence riders’ willingness to consider pooled ridesharing are vehicle technology/accessibility (B = 1.10) and convenience (B = 0.94), while lack of passenger safety (B = −0.63) and comfort/ease of use (B = −0.17) are pooled ridesharing deterrents. Understanding user-centered design and service factors are critical to increase the use of pooled ridesharing services in the future.