Therapeutic strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) counteract the immunosuppressive effects of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and ligand-1 (PD-L1). ICI treatment has emerged in...

Vaccination is the primary public health strategy to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. Although solid tumor and hematologic patients are at higher risk of serious COVID-19-related complications, data on immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines in this patient cohort are particularly scarce. The present study, therefore, aimed at the standardized determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers among non-vaccinated versus vaccinated solid tumor and hematologic patients who are under clinical observation or under treatment at the University Hospital Krems. Standardized anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titers of a total of 441 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Our results show that antibody titers against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are significantly higher in solid tumor versus hematologic patients. While SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were equal among sexes, an age-dependent decrease was observed. Of note, our studies additionally show that complete vaccination represents a valuable predictor for high anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in solid tumor and hematologic patients. In summary, to date, this is one of the largest studies to comprehensively evaluate the impact of various COVID-19 vaccines on anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody production in solid tumor and hematologic patients. Our findings aim to support future vaccination strategies in these highly vulnerable patients, including vaccination booster programs and alternative protective approaches.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prognostic information is essential in finding the right treatment. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL. Methods: Patients with DLBCL, treated with first-line R-CHOP, were retrospectively analyzed in groups of high (>70%) and low (≤70%) Ki-67. Parameters of interest were the international prognostic index (IPI), treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was conducted to analyze categorical variables. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were applied for survival analyses. Finally, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed, including gender, Ki-67 ≤ 70% or >70%, IPI and presence of B symptoms. Results: Overall, 58 patients were included. No significant association was found between Ki-67 status and IPI (p = 0.148) or treatment response (p = 0.373). Survival in patients with high Ki-67 was significantly inferior with respect to OS (p = 0.047) but not PFS (p = 0.138). Multivariate linear regression, however, yielded only IPI as a risk factor for OS. Conclusion: Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed in order to elucidate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.

Systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) for advanced cancer patients with limited prognosis before death is associated with high toxicity and reduced quality of life. Guidelines discourage this approach as low-value care. However, a significant number of patients continue to receive SACT in the last 30 days of life. A retrospective study was carried out at the University Hospital Krems, encompassing the analysis of patients who were diagnosed with a solid tumor and died between 2017 and 2021, with a particular focus on the use of end-of-life (EOL) SACT. A total of 685 patients were included in the study. SACT was applied in 342 (49.9%) patients, of whom 143 (41.8%, total population: 20.9%) patients received SACT within the last 30 days of life. Median time from last SACT to death was 44.5 days. The analysis of potential factors impacting the administration of EOL SACT revealed the following significant findings: type of SACT [P < 0.001, targeted therapy odds ratio (OR) 5.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.26-11.48; chemotherapy/targeted therapy OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.47-8.82; immune checkpoint inhibitor OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.37-3.92], no referral to palliative care (PC) (P = 0.009, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.16-2.96), no admission to PC ward (P < 0.001, OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.67-4.35), and poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (≥2, P < 0.001, OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.93-5.83). The timing of SACT near the EOL is significantly influenced by several factors, including the type of SACT, referral to PC services, admission to PC unit, and ECOG performance status. These findings underscore the complexity of treatment decisions in advanced cancer care and highlight the need for personalized, patient-centered approaches that consider both clinical and patient-related factors to optimize care at the EOL.

Atopics have a lower risk for malignancies, and IgE targeted to tumors is superior to IgG in fighting cancer. Whether IgE-mediated innate or adaptive immune surveillance can confer protection against tumors remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of active and passive immunotherapy to the tumor-associated antigen HER-2 in three murine models differing in Epsilon-B-cell-receptor expression affecting the levels of expressed IgE. We compared the levels of several serum specific anti-HER-2 antibodies (IgE, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgA) and the survival rates in low-IgE ΔM1M2 mice lacking the transmembrane/cytoplasmic domain of Epsilon-B-cell-receptors expressing reduced IgE levels, high-IgE KN1 mice expressing chimeric Epsilon-Gamma1-B-cell receptors with 4-6-fold elevated serum IgE levels, and wild type (WT) BALB/c. Prior engrafting mice with D2F2/E2 mammary tumors overexpressing HER-2, mice were vaccinated with HER-2 or vehicle control PBS using the Th2-adjuvant Al(OH)3 (active immunotherapy), or treated with the murine anti-HER-2 IgG1 antibody 4D5 (passive immunotherapy). Overall, among the three strains of mice, HER-2 vaccination induced significantly higher levels of HER-2 specific IgE and IgG1 in high-IgE KN1, while low-IgE ΔM1M2 mice had higher IgG2a levels. HER-2 vaccination and passive immunotherapy prolonged the survival in tumor-grafted WT and low-IgE ΔM1M2 strains compared with treatment controls; active vaccination provided the highest benefit. Notably, untreated high-IgE KN1 mice displayed the longest survival of all strains, which could not be further extended by active or passive immunotherapy. Active and passive immunotherapies prolong survival in wild type and low-IgE ΔM1M2 mice engrafted with mammary tumors. High-IgE KN1 mice have an innate survival benefit following tumor challenge.