Significance: Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-linked arachidonic acid (AA) and adrenic acid (AdA) are well-known substrates for lipid peroxidation, which are indispensable for ferroptosis, an iron-dependent regulated necrosis. However, how cells differentially regulate the intracellular pools of AA and AdA is not fully understood. Here, elongation of very long-chain fatty acid protein 5 (ELOVL5) and fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1) are differentially expressed in gastric cancer cells, discriminating the cellular susceptibility to ferroptosis. Biochemical and lipidomics analyses support the hypothesis that ELOVL5 and FADS1 are required to maintain intracellular levels of AA and AdA and promote ferroptosis. Our study highlights the biosynthesis of AA and AdA by ELOVL5 and FADS1 as a critical checkpoint in the ferroptosis pathway.

A lysosome, an acidic membrane-bound organelle, contains hydrolytic enzymes to digest macromolecules for recycling. Many lysosomal enzymes (LEs) traffic to the lysosome through the mannose-6-phosphate (M6P)-dependent pathway. Some mannose residues of high-mannose type N-glycans on LEs can be phosphorylated in the Golgi apparatus through two-step enzyme reactions. The consequent M6P moiety is recognized by M6P receptors (MPRs) on the trans-Golgi network membrane and delivered through the endo-lysosomal pathway. On the other hand, secreted LEs containing M6P glycans can be recaptured by MPRs on the plasma membrane and targeted to the lysosome. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for lysosomal storage diseases exploits this M6P-MPR-dependent endocytosis to deliver recombinant enzymes to lysosomes. This review discusses various engineering and application technologies using M6P’s lysosomal targeting. Glyco-engineering for increasing M6P contents developed ‘Bio-better’ ERT enzymes with enhanced therapeutic efficacy. M6P-decorated peptides, proteins, liposomes, and nanoparticles have been developed for drug delivery and subcellular imaging. A recently developed lysosome-targeting chimera uses an M6P-based bifunctional binder to degrade specific extracellular and membrane proteins. The success and efficiency of M6P-based lysosomal targeting will boost further technological developments with new applications in the biomedical field.

Significance: A major yet perplexing question in the field of necroptosis is the role and involvement of necroptosis in cancer cells. Many cancer cells have protective mechanisms against necroptosis, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. We report findings of cross-talk and a regulatory pathway that exist between MYC, a potent oncogene, and RIPK3, a pivotal factor in necroptosis. We find that MYC pathway is downregulated upon necroptotic, while MYC inhibits TNF-α–induced necroptosis. The inhibitory effect of MYC on necroptosis is unexpected because no transcriptional activity by MYC is required. Mechanistically, a direct interaction between MYC and RIPK3 takes place in the cytosol, preventing RIPK1–RIPK3 complex formation. Finally, MYC depletion enhances antitumor activity of necroptosis-inducing agents in a xenograft model.

Tumorigenesis can be induced by various stresses that cause aberrant DNA mutations and unhindered cell proliferation. Under such conditions, normal cells autonomously induce defense mechanisms, thereby stimulating tumor suppressor activation. ARF, encoded by the CDKN2a locus, is one of the most frequently mutated or deleted tumor suppressors in human cancer. The safeguard roles of ARF in tumorigenesis are mainly mediated via the MDM2-p53 axis, which plays a prominent role in tumor suppression. Under normal conditions, low p53 expression is stringently regulated by its target gene, MDM2 E3 ligase, which induces p53 degradation in a ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent manner. Oncogenic signals induced by MYC, RAS, and E2Fs trap MDM2 in the inhibited state by inducing ARF expression as a safeguard measure, thereby activating the tumor-suppressive function of p53. In addition to the MDM2-p53 axis, ARF can also interact with diverse proteins and regulate various cellular functions, such as cellular senescence, apoptosis, and anoikis, in a p53-independent manner. As the evidence indicating ARF as a key tumor suppressor has been accumulated, there is growing evidence that ARF is sophisticatedly fine-tuned by the diverse factors through transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms. In this review, we mainly focused on how cancer cells employ transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms to manipulate ARF activities to circumvent the tumor-suppressive function of ARF. We further discussed the clinical implications of ARF in human cancer.

Eun Bi Cha, Keun Koo Shin, Jinho Seo & Doo-Byoung Oh. BMB Reports 2020;53:442-7. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2020.53.8.024