Circadian (∼24-hour) timing systems pervade all kingdoms of life and temporally optimize behavior and physiology in humans. Relatively recent changes to our environments, such as the introduction of artificial lighting, can disorganize the circadian system, from the level of the molecular clocks that regulate the timing of cellular activities to the level of synchronization between our daily cycles of behavior and the solar day. Sleep/wake cycles are intertwined with the circadian system, and global trends indicate that these, too, are increasingly subject to disruption. A large proportion of the world's population is at increased risk of environmentally driven circadian rhythm and sleep disruption, and a minority of individuals are also genetically predisposed to circadian misalignment and sleep disorders. The consequences of disruption to the circadian system and sleep are profound and include myriad metabolic ramifications, some of which may be compounded by adverse effects on dietary choices. If not addressed, the deleterious effects of such disruption will continue to cause widespread health problems; therefore, implementation of the numerous behavioral and pharmaceutical interventions that can help restore circadian system alignment and enhance sleep will be important.

The human circadian system anticipates and adapts to daily environmental changes to optimise behaviour according to time of day and temporally partitions incompatible physiological processes. At the helm of this system is a master clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus. The SCN are primarily synchronised to the 24-h day by the light/dark cycle; however, feeding/fasting cycles are the primary time cues for clocks in peripheral tissues. Aligning feeding/fasting cycles with clock-regulated metabolic changes optimises metabolism, and studies of other animals suggest that feeding at inappropriate times disrupts circadian system organisation, and thereby contributes to adverse metabolic consequences and chronic disease development. ‘High-fat diets’ (HFD) produce particularly deleterious effects on circadian system organisation in rodents by blunting feeding/fasting cycles. Time-of-day-restricted feeding, where food availability is restricted to a period of several hours, offsets many adverse consequences of HFD in these animals; however, further evidence is required to assess whether the same is true in humans. Several nutritional compounds have robust effects on the circadian system. Caffeine, for example, can speed synchronisation to new time zones after jetlag. An appreciation of the circadian system has many implications for nutritional science and may ultimately help reduce the burden of chronic diseases.

Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma commonly arises from a precancerous condition, Barrett's esophagus, in which the normal squamous epithelium is replaced by a columnar cell-lined epithelium. Genetic alterations occurring in this process could serve as biomarkers for the risk of malignant progression, improve surveillance, and contribute to early diagnosis. We examined two potential biomarkers, cyclin D1 and p53, in a prospective cohort of Barrett's esophagus patients. Methods: A total of 307 patients were enrolled in an endoscopic surveillance cohort, and esophageal biopsy specimens were collected at each endoscopy. Incident cases of adenocarcinoma were matched to control patients within the cohort by duration of follow-up, age, sex, and length of columnar cell-lined epithelium at recruitment. Biopsy specimens were analyzed for cyclin D1 and p53 protein levels by immunohistochemistry. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 12 cases of adenocarcinoma occurred within the follow-up period, and tumor biopsy specimens from 11 cases stained positive for cyclin D1. Biopsy specimens from eight of these patients taken at recruitment also stained positive for cyclin D1. A case–control analysis of biopsy specimens obtained at recruitment revealed a statistically significantly increased risk of progression to adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus patients whose biopsy specimens were cyclin D1 positive (odds ratio [OR] = 6.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57–29.91; P = .0106) but not in patients whose biopsy specimens were p53 positive (OR = 2.99; 95% CI = 0.57–15.76; P = .197). Conclusions: Cyclin D1-positive staining could be a useful biomarker in identifying Barrett's esophagus patients at high risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the complexity of genetic alterations in the natural history of this cancer, additional biomarkers will be required to increase the sensitivity and specificity of molecular diagnosis.