Anna Tsimokha

Dr. Anna Tsimokha

Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
IKIrina M Konstantinova
Irina M Konstantinova
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
Alexey G. MittenbergAlexey G. Mittenberg
Alexey G. Mittenberg

24 May 2020 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Boris MargulisBoris Margulis
Boris Margulis
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
SZSvetlana Zubova
Svetlana Zubova
IGIrina Guzhova
Irina Guzhova
Throughout their life cycles, cells are subject to a variety of stresses that lead to a compromise between cell death and survival. Survival is partially provided by the cell proteostasis network, which consists of molecular chaperones, a ubiquitin-proteasome system of degradation and autophagy. The cooperation of these systems impacts the correct function of protein synthesis/modification/transport machinery starting from the adaption of nascent polypeptides to cellular overcrowding until the utilization of damaged or needless proteins. Eventually, aging cells, in parallel to the accumulation of flawed proteins, gradually lose their proteostasis mechanisms, and this loss leads to the degeneration of large cellular masses and to number of age-associated pathologies and ultimately death. In this review, we describe the function of proteostasis mechanisms with an emphasis on the possible associations between them.

1 December 2011 in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OFOlga A. Fedorova
Olga A. Fedorova
TMTatiana Moiseeva
Tatiana Moiseeva
ANAndrey Nikiforov
Andrey Nikiforov
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
VLVeronika A. Livinskaya
Veronika A. Livinskaya
NBNickolai A. Barlev
Nickolai A. Barlev

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTatiana Starkova
Tatiana Starkova
APAlexander M. Polyanichko
Alexander M. Polyanichko
TATatiana O. Artamonova
Tatiana O. Artamonova
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
ATAlexey Tomilin
Alexey Tomilin
ECElena Chikhirzhina
Elena Chikhirzhina
Non-histone nuclear proteins HMGB1 and HMGB2 (High Mobility Group) are involved in many biological processes, such as replication, transcription, and repair. The HMGB1 and HMGB2 proteins consist of a short N-terminal region, two DNA-binding domains, A and B, and a C-terminal sequence of glutamic and aspartic acids. In this work, the structural organization of calf thymus HMGB1 and HMGB2 proteins and their complexes with DNA were studied using UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Post-translational modifications (PTM) of HMGB1 and HMGB2 proteins were determined with MALDI mass spectrometry. We have shown that despite the similar primary structures of the HMGB1 and HMGB2 proteins, their post-translational modifications (PTMs) demonstrate quite different patterns. The HMGB1 PTMs are located predominantly in the DNA-binding A-domain and linker region connecting the A and B domains. On the contrary, HMGB2 PTMs are found mostly in the B-domain and within the linker region. It was also shown that, despite the high degree of homology between HMGB1 and HMGB2, the secondary structure of these proteins is also slightly different. We believe that the revealed structural properties might determine the difference in the functioning of the HMGB1 and HMGB2 as well as their protein partners.

1 November 2017 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKValentina A. Kulichkova
Valentina A. Kulichkova
TATatiana O. Artamonova
Tatiana O. Artamonova
OLOlga Lyublinskaya
Olga Lyublinskaya
MKMikhail A. Khodorkovskii
Mikhail A. Khodorkovskii
ATAlexey Tomilin
Alexey Tomilin
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
Proteomic analysis of affinity-purified extracellular proteasomes reveals exclusively 20S complexes Proteomic analysis of affinity-purified extracellular proteasomes reveals exclusively 20S complexes

9 May 2014 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anna TsimokhaAnna Tsimokha
Anna Tsimokha
VKValentina A. Kulichkova
Valentina A. Kulichkova
EKElena V. Karpova
Elena V. Karpova
JZJulia J. Zaykova
Julia J. Zaykova
NANikolai D. Aksenov
Nikolai D. Aksenov
Nick BarlevNick Barlev
Nick Barlev
26S proteasomes are known as major non-lysosomal cellular machines for coordinated and specific destruction of ubiquitinylated proteins. The proteolytic activities of proteasomes are controlled by various post-translational modifications in response to environmental cues, including DNA damage. Besides proteolysis, proteasomes also associate with RNA hydrolysis and splicing. Here, we extend the functional diversity of proteasomes by showing that they also dynamically associate with microRNAs (miRNAs) both in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells. Moreover, DNA damage induced by an anti-cancer drug, doxorubicin, alters the repertoire of proteasome-associated miRNAs, enriching the population of miRNAs that target cell cycle checkpoint regulators and DNA repair proteins. Collectively, these data uncover yet another potential mode of action for proteasomes in the cell via their dynamic association with microRNAs.