Hendrik Borgmann

Dr. Hendrik Borgmann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHendrik Borgmann
Hendrik Borgmann
NLNada Lallous
Nada Lallous
DODeniz Ozistanbullu
Deniz Ozistanbullu
EBEliana Beraldi
Eliana Beraldi
NPNaman Paul
Naman Paul
MGMartin E. Gleave
Martin E. Gleave

19 October 2016 in World Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HBHendrik Borgmann
Hendrik Borgmann
MSMoisés Elias Rodriguez Socarras
Moisés Elias Rodriguez Socarras
JSJ. Salem
J. Salem
ITI. Tsaur
I. Tsaur
JRJuan Gómez Rivas
Juan Gómez Rivas
LTL. Tortolero
L. Tortolero

1 November 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHendrik Borgmann
Hendrik Borgmann
MCMatthew Cooperberg
Matthew Cooperberg
DMDeclan Murphy
Declan Murphy
SLStacy Loeb
Stacy Loeb
JNJames N’dOw
James N’dOw
AKAlexander Kutikov
Alexander Kutikov

13 October 2015 in Canadian Urological Association Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHendrik Borgmann
Hendrik Borgmann
SDSasha DeWitt
Sasha DeWitt
ITIgor Tsaur
Igor Tsaur
AHAxel Haferkamp
Axel Haferkamp
SLStacy Loeb
Stacy Loeb
Twitter use has grown exponentially within the urological community. We aimed to determine the perceptions of the impact of Twitter on users' clinical practice, research, and other professional activities. We performed an 11-item online survey of Twitter contributors during two major urological meetings: the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meetings. During the EAU 2014 meeting, we distributed the survey via the meeting official Twitter feed. During the AUA 2014 meeting, we applied a new method by directly sending the survey to Twitter contributors. We performed a subset analysis for assessing the perceived impact of Twitter on the clinical practice of physicians. Among 312 total respondents, the greatest perceived benefits of Twitter among users were for networking (97%) and disseminating information (96%), followed by research (75%), advocacy (74%) and career development (62%). In total, 65% of Twitter users have dealt with guidelines on online medical professionalism and 71% of physician users found that Twitter had an impact on their clinical practice, and 33% had made a clinical decision based on an online case discussion. Our results suggest that Twitter users in the urological community perceive important benefits. These benefits extend to multiple professional domains, particularly networking, disseminating information, remote conference participation, research, and advocacy. This is the first study that has been disseminated to targeted individuals from the urological community directly through tweets, providing a proof of principle for this research method.

1 September 2016 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHendrik Borgmann
Hendrik Borgmann
ARAnn-Kathrin Reiss
Ann-Kathrin Reiss
MKMartin Kurosch
Martin Kurosch
NFNatalie Filmann
Natalie Filmann
SFSebastian Frees
Sebastian Frees
AHAxel Haferkamp
Axel Haferkamp
Several nephrometry scores have been proposed to predict perioperative outcomes in renal surgery. We evaluated which nephrometry score correlates best with the MIC (margin, ischemia and complications) score and quantitative perioperative outcomes in nephron sparing surgery. Data on 188 patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery were retrospectively investigated for patient, operative and tumor characteristics. Nephrometry scores, including R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching the main renal artery or vein and location relative to polar lines), PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical), C-index (concordance index) and DAP (diameter-axial-polar), were measured on preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and coded continuously and categorically. Parameters pertaining to tumor margin, ischemia and complications were recorded as binary scores and classified as MIC achievement. Operative time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time and hospital stay were recorded as quantitative perioperative outcomes. The R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC and quantitative perioperative outcomes. The continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. score was predictive of MIC on univariate analysis (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p = 0.03) and it had the best predictive value on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p = 0.03). The C-index but not the PADUA or the DAP score was predictive of MIC on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. MIC achievement rates were significantly higher for low than for high complexity tumors as assessed by categorically coded R.E.N.A.L. score, C-index and DAP scores. Continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores positively correlated with operative time, warm ischemia time and hospital stay. The C-index and the DAP score correlated with warm ischemia time. Of 4 nephrometry scores the R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC achievement and quantitative perioperative outcomes of nephron sparing surgery.

28 March 2020 in World Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRobert Dotzauer
Robert Dotzauer
ATA. La Torre
A. La Torre
ATAnita Thomas
Anita Thomas
MBM. P. Brandt
M. P. Brandt
KBK. Böhm
K. Böhm
Igor TsaurIgor Tsaur
Igor Tsaur
Purpose: Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is a standard surgical technique for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size larger than 80 ml. As a minimally invasive approach, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) emerged as a feasible surgical alternative. Currently, there are no definite recommendations for the standard use of RASP. Therefore, we aimed at investigating various clinical outcomes comparing RASP with OSP. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated clinical data from 103 RASP and 31 OSP patients. Both cohorts were compared regarding different clinical characteristics with and without propensity score matching. To detect independent predictive factors for clinical outcomes, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy patients demonstrated a lower estimated blood loss and need for postoperative blood transfusions as well as less postoperative complications. OSP had a shorter operative time (125 min vs. 182 min) longer hospital stay (11 days vs. 9 days) and longer time to catheter removal (8 days vs. 6 days). In the multivariate analysis, RASP was identified as an independent predictor for longer operative time, lower estimated blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, shorter time to catheter removal, less postoperative complications and blood transfusions. Conclusion: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe alternative to OSP with less perioperative and postoperative morbidity. Whether OSP (shorter operative time) or RASP (shorter length of hospital stay) has a more favorable economic impact depends on the particular conditions of different health care systems. Further prospective comparative research is warranted to define the value of RASP in the current surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.