Background: Recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are mainly due to pulmonary vein reconnection. However, a growing number of patients have AF recurrences despite durable PVI. The optimal ablative strategy for these patients is unknown. We analyzed the impact of current ablation strategies in a large multicenter study. Methods: Patients undergoing a redo ablation for AF and presenting durable PVI were included. The freedom from atrial arrhythmia after pulmonary vein-based, linear-based, electrogram-based, and trigger-based ablation strategies were compared. Results: Between 2010 and 2020, 367 patients (67% men, 63±10 years, 44% paroxysmal) underwent a redo ablation for AF recurrences despite durable PVI at 39 centers. After durable PVI was confirmed, linear-based ablation was performed in 219 (60%) patients, electrogram-based ablation in 168 (45%) patients, trigger-based ablation in 101 (27%) patients, and pulmonary vein-based ablation in 56 (15%) patients. Seven patients (2%) did not undergo any additional ablation during the redo procedure. After 22±19 months of follow-up, 122 (33%) and 159 (43%) patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No significant difference in arrhythmia-free survival was observed between the different ablation strategies. Left atrial dilatation was the only independent factor associated with arrhythmia-free survival (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.13–2.23]; P =0.006). Conclusions: In patients with recurrent AF despite durable PVI, no ablation strategy used alone or in combination during the redo procedure appears to be superior in improving arrhythmia-free survival. Left atrial size is a significant predictor of ablation outcome in this population.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been reported as a safe and efficient therapy for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) despite optimal medical treatment and catheter ablation. However, data on the use of SBRT in patients with electrical storm (ES) is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes associated with SBRT in the context of ES. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent SBRT in the context of ES from March 2020 to March 2021 in one tertiary center (CHU Lille). The target volume was delineated according to a predefined workflow. The efficacy was assessed with the following end points: sustained VT recurrence, VT reduced with antitachycardia pacing, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SBRT to treat refractory VT in the context of ES (mean 67±12.8 age, 59% presenting ischemic heart disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 33.7± 9.7%). Five patients presented with ES related to incessant VT. Among these 5 patients, the time to effectiveness ranged from 1 to 7 weeks after SBRT. In the 12 remaining patients, VT recurrences occurred in 7 patients during the first 6 weeks following SBRT. After a median 12.5 (10.5–17.8) months follow-up, a significant reduction of the VT burden was observed beyond 6 weeks (−91% [95% CI, 78–103]), P <0.0001). The incidence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock and antitachycardia pacing was 36% at 1 year. Conclusions: SBRT is associated with a significant reduction of the VT burden in the event of an ES; however, prospective randomized control trials are needed. In patients without incessant VT, recurrences are observed in half of patients during the first 6 weeks. VT tolerance and implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming adjustments should be integrated as part of an action plan defined before SBRT for each patient.

Studies assessing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) report VT recurrences, but have not evaluated the impact of RFA on relevant clinical events during follow-up. We aimed to investigate relevant RFA outcomes in a multicentric registry. This study included 49 patients with ARVC (46 with definite diagnosis, 3 with borderline diagnosis according to revised Task Force Criteria) who underwent 92 RFA procedures (83 endocardial, 9 combined endo–epicardial) between 1999–2015. Ventricular tachycardia recurrences and VT burden were assessed after each procedure or after the last RFA. Over a mean follow-up of 64 ± 51 months, VT-free survival was 37% at 1 year, 19% at 5 years, and 14% at 10 years. Ventricular tachycardia burden was significantly reduced after one procedure (23 vs. 11 VT episodes/year, P < 0.01) and after the last RFA (14 vs. 2 VT episodes/year, P < 0.01). Over a mean follow-up of 49 ± 52 months, clinical response after the last RFA (freedom from sudden cardiac death, VT requiring hospitalization, or heart transplantation) was 86% at 1 year, 69% at 5 years, and 60% at 10 years. Clinical response was associated with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and low numbers of mappable VT before the first RFA. RFA was predominantly targeted at the endocardial surface. Ventricular tachycardia recurrences were common, but few ARVC patients experienced major clinical events during follow-up. Further studies should investigate the benefit of extensive substrate ablation combined with endo–epicardial strategies.