Malin Lohela-Karlsson

Dr. Malin Lohela-Karlsson

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Stockholm, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Value in Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCarl Strömberg
Carl Strömberg
EAEmmanuel Aboagye
Emmanuel Aboagye
JHJan Hagberg
Jan Hagberg
GBGunnar Bergström
Gunnar Bergström
Malin Lohela-KarlssonMalin Lohela-Karlsson
Malin Lohela-Karlsson

1 February 2015 in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAEmmanuel Aboagye
Emmanuel Aboagye
Malin Lohela-KarlssonMalin Lohela-Karlsson
Malin Lohela-Karlsson
JHJ Hagberg
J Hagberg
IJIrene Jensen
Irene Jensen
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year.

12 September 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAndreas Eklund
Andreas Eklund
IJIrene Jensen
Irene Jensen
Malin Lohela-KarlssonMalin Lohela-Karlsson
Malin Lohela-Karlsson
JHJan Hagberg
Jan Hagberg
CLCharlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
IAIben Axén
Iben Axén
For individuals with recurrent or persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP), exercise and exercise combined with education have been shown to be effective in preventing new episodes or in reducing the impact of the condition. Chiropractors have traditionally used Maintenance Care (MC), as secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of MC on pain trajectories for patients with recurrent or persistent LBP. This pragmatic, investigator-blinded, two arm randomized controlled trial included consecutive patients (18–65 years old) with non-specific LBP, who had an early favorable response to chiropractic care. After an initial course of treatment, eligible subjects were randomized to either MC or control (symptom-guided treatment). The primary outcome was total number of days with bothersome LBP during 52 weeks collected weekly with text-messages (SMS) and estimated by a GEE model. Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. MC resulted in a reduction in the total number of days per week with bothersome LBP compared with symptom-guided treatment. During the 12 month study period, the MC group (n = 163, 3 dropouts) reported 12.8 (95% CI = 10.1, 15.5; p = <0.001) fewer days in total with bothersome LBP compared to the control group (n = 158, 4 dropouts) and received 1.7 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.1; p = <0.001) more treatments. Numbers presented are means. No serious adverse events were recorded. MC was more effective than symptom-guided treatment in reducing the total number of days over 52 weeks with bothersome non-specific LBP but it resulted in a higher number of treatments. For selected patients with recurrent or persistent non-specific LBP who respond well to an initial course of chiropractic care, MC should be considered an option for tertiary prevention.

14 April 2020 in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarijke Keus van de Poll
Marijke Keus van de Poll
LNLotta Nybergh
Lotta Nybergh
CLCaroline Lornudd
Caroline Lornudd
JHJan Hagberg
Jan Hagberg
LBLennart Bodin
Lennart Bodin
GBGunnar Bergstrom
Gunnar Bergstrom
Objectives Common mental disorders (CMDs) are among the main causes of sickness absence and can lead to suffering and high costs for individuals, employers and the society. The occupational health service (OHS) can offer work-directed interventions to support employers and employees. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on sickness absence and health of a work-directed intervention given by the OHS to employees with CMDs or stress-related symptoms. Methods Randomisation was conducted at the OHS consultant level and each consultant was allocated into either giving a brief problem-solving intervention (PSI) or care as usual (CAU). The study group consisted of 100 employees with stress symptoms or CMDs. PSI was highly structured and used a participatory approach, involving both the employee and the employee’s manager. CAU was also work-directed but not based on the same theoretical concepts as PSI. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months. Primary outcome was registered sickness absence during the 1-year follow-up period. Among the secondary outcomes were self-registered sickness absence, return to work (RTW) and mental health. Results A statistical interaction for group × time was found on the primary outcome (p=0.033) and PSI had almost 15 days less sickness absence during follow-up compared with CAU. Concerning the secondary outcomes, PSI showed an earlier partial RTW and the mental health improved in both groups without significant group differences. Conclusion PSI was effective in reducing sickness absence which was the primary outcome in this study.

1 February 2018 in Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAikaterini Grimani
Aikaterini Grimani
GBGunnar Bergström
Gunnar Bergström
MCMartha Isabel Riaño Casallas
Martha Isabel Riaño Casallas
EAEmmanuel Aboagye
Emmanuel Aboagye
IJIrene Jensen
Irene Jensen
Malin Lohela-KarlssonMalin Lohela-Karlsson
Malin Lohela-Karlsson
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of occupational safety and health interventions from the employer perspective. A comprehensive literature search (2005–2016) in five electronic databases was conducted. Pre-2005 studies were identified from the reference lists of previous studies and systematic reviews, which have similar objective to those of this search. A total of nineteen RCT and quasi-experimental studies were included, targeting diverse health problems in a number of settings. Few studies included organizational-level interventions. When viewed in relation to the methodological quality and the sufficiency of economic evidence, five of eleven cost-effective OSH interventions appear to be promising. The present systematic review highlights the need for high-quality economic evidence to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of OSH interventions, especially at organizational-level, in all areas of worker health. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

1 December 2013 in Journal of Vocational Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristina Björklund
Christina Björklund
IJIrene Jensen
Irene Jensen
Malin Lohela-KarlssonMalin Lohela-Karlsson
Malin Lohela-Karlsson