Samia Aci-Sèche

Dr. Samia Aci-Sèche

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2020 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBColin Bournez
Colin Bournez
FCFabrice CARLES
Fabrice CARLES
GPGautier Peyrat
Gautier Peyrat
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche
SBStéphane Bourg
Stéphane Bourg
PBPascal BONNET
Pascal BONNET
Since the first approval of a protein kinase inhibitor (PKI) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001, 55 new PKIs have reached the market, and many inhibitors are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This is a clear indication that protein kinases still represent major drug targets for the pharmaceutical industry. In a previous work, we have introduced PKIDB, a publicly available database, gathering PKIs that have already been approved (Phase 4), as well as those currently in clinical trials (Phases 0 to 3). This database is updated frequently, and an analysis of the new data is presented here. In addition, we compared the set of PKIs present in PKIDB with the PKIs in early preclinical studies found in ChEMBL, the largest publicly available chemical database. For each dataset, the distribution of physicochemical descriptors related to drug-likeness is presented. From these results, updated guidelines to prioritize compounds for targeting protein kinases are proposed. The results of a principal component analysis (PCA) show that the PKIDB dataset is fully encompassed within all PKIs found in the public database. This observation is reinforced by a principal moments of inertia (PMI) analysis of all molecules. Interestingly, we notice that PKIs in clinical trials tend to explore new 3D chemical space. While a great majority of PKIs is located on the area of “flatland”, we find few compounds exploring the 3D structural space. Finally, a scaffold diversity analysis of the two datasets, based on frequency counts was performed. The results give insight into the chemical space of PKIs, and can guide researchers to reach out new unexplored areas. PKIDB is freely accessible from the following website: http://www.icoa.fr/pkidb.

7 April 2016 in Future Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche
SZSonia Ziada
Sonia Ziada
ABAbdennour Braka
Abdennour Braka
RARohit Arora
Rohit Arora
PBPascal BONNET
Pascal BONNET
Interest in the application of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has increased in the field of protein kinase (PK) drug discovery. PKs belong to an important drug target class because they are directly involved in a number of diseases, including cancer. MD methods simulate dynamic biological and chemical events at an atomic level. This information can be combined with other in silico and experimental methods to efficiently target selected receptors. In this review, we present common and advanced methods of MD simulations and we focus on the recent applications of MD-based methodologies that provided significant insights into the elucidation of biological mechanisms involving PKs and into the discovery of novel kinase inhibitors.

13 December 2019 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAbdennour Braka
Abdennour Braka
NGNorbert Garnier
Norbert Garnier
PBPascal BONNET
Pascal BONNET
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche

9 November 2022 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZSonia Ziada
Sonia Ziada
JDJulien Diharce
Julien Diharce
EREric Raimbaud
Eric Raimbaud
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche
PDPierre Ducrot
Pierre Ducrot
PBPascal BONNET
Pascal BONNET

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPierre-Yves Libouban
Pierre-Yves Libouban
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche
JGJose Carlos Gómez-Tamayo
Jose Carlos Gómez-Tamayo
GTGary Tresadern
Gary Tresadern
PBPascal BONNET
Pascal BONNET
Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained significant traction in the field of drug discovery, with deep learning (DL) algorithms playing a crucial role in predicting protein–ligand binding affinities. Despite advancements in neural network architectures, system representation, and training techniques, the performance of DL affinity prediction has reached a plateau, prompting the question of whether it is truly solved or if the current performance is overly optimistic and reliant on biased, easily predictable data. Like other DL-related problems, this issue seems to stem from the training and test sets used when building the models. In this work, we investigate the impact of several parameters related to the input data on the performance of neural network affinity prediction models. Notably, we identify the size of the binding pocket as a critical factor influencing the performance of our statistical models; furthermore, it is more important to train a model with as much data as possible than to restrict the training to only high-quality datasets. Finally, we also confirm the bias in the typically used current test sets. Therefore, several types of evaluation and benchmarking are required to understand models’ decision-making processes and accurately compare the performance of models.

21 July 2011 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASamia Aci-Sèche
Samia Aci-Sèche
MGMonique Genest
Monique Genest
NGNorbert Garnier
Norbert Garnier