Nicola Scichilone

Prof. Dr. Nicola Scichilone

University of Palermo
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2011 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrea S. Melani
Andrea S. Melani
MBMarco Bonavia
Marco Bonavia
VCVincenzo Cilenti
Vincenzo Cilenti
CCCristina Cinti
Cristina Cinti
MLMarco Lodi
Marco Lodi
MNMargherita Neri
Margherita Neri

1 April 2014 in Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSS. Saturni
S. Saturni
FBF. Bellini
F. Bellini
FBF. Braido
F. Braido
PPP. Paggiaro
P. Paggiaro
ASA. Sanduzzi
A. Sanduzzi
APAlberto Papi
Alberto Papi

1 August 2000 in Journal of Applied Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTrisevgeni Kapsali
Trisevgeni Kapsali
SPSolbert Permutt
Solbert Permutt
BLBeth Laube
Beth Laube
Nicola ScichiloneNicola Scichilone
Nicola Scichilone
ATAlkis Togias
Alkis Togias
In the absence of deep inspirations, healthy individuals develop bronchoconstriction with methacholine inhalation. One hypothesis is that deep inspiration results in bronchodilation. In this study, we tested an alternative hypothesis, that deep inspiration acts as a bronchoprotector. Single-dose methacholine bronchoprovocations were performed after 20 min of deep breath inhibition, in nine healthy subjects and in eight asthmatics, to establish the dose that reduces forced expiratory volume in 1 s by >15%. The provocation was repeated with two and five deep inspirations preceding methacholine. Additional studies were carried out to assess optimization and reproducibility of the protocol and to rule out the possibility that bronchoprotection may result from changes in airway geometry or from differential spasmogen deposition. In healthy subjects, five deep inspirations conferred 85% bronchoprotection. The bronchoprotective effect was reproducible and was not attributable to increased airway caliber or to differential deposition of methacholine. Deep inspirations did not protect the bronchi of asthmatics. We demonstrated that bronchoprotection is a potent physiologic function of lung inflation and established its absence, even in mild asthma. This observation deepens our understanding of airway dysfunction in asthma.

15 March 2001 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRobert H. Brown
Robert H. Brown
Nicola ScichiloneNicola Scichilone
Nicola Scichilone
BMBeatrice Mudge
Beatrice Mudge
FDFiona B. Diemer
Fiona B. Diemer
SPSolbert Permutt
Solbert Permutt
ATAlkis Togias
Alkis Togias
The effects of a deep inspiration (DI) in individuals with asthma differ from those observed in healthy subjects. It has been postulated that the beneficial effect of lung inflation is mediated by airway stretch. One hypothesis to explain the defects in the function of lung inflation in asthma is that a DI may be unable to stretch the airways. This may result from attenuation of the tethering forces between the airways and the surrounding parenchyma. In the current study, we used high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) to examine the ability of a DI to distend the airways of subjects with asthma (n = 10) compared with healthy subjects (n = 9) at baseline and after increasing airway tone with methacholine (MCh). We found that both at baseline and after the induction of smooth muscle tone with MCh, a DI distended the airways of healthy and asthmatic subjects to a similar extent, indicating that abnormal interdependence between the lung parenchyma and the airways is unlikely to play a major role in the loss or attenuation of the beneficial effect of lung inflation that characterizes asthma. Furthermore, we observed that after constriction had already been induced by MCh, following a DI, bronchodilation occurred in the healthy subjects but further bronchoconstriction occurred in the subjects with asthma. Our findings suggest that an abnormal excitation contraction mechanism in the airway smooth muscle of subjects with mild asthma counteracts the bronchodilatory effect of a DI. Therefore, the mechanism for reduced bronchodilation after DIs in subjects with mild asthma could be intrinsic to the airway smooth muscle.

1 September 2003 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Raffaele Antonelli IncalziRaffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
CIC. Imperiale
C. Imperiale
VBV. Bellia
V. Bellia
FCF. Catalano
F. Catalano
Nicola ScichiloneNicola Scichilone
Nicola Scichilone
TIthe SaRA investigators
the SaRA investigators
The purpose of this study was to assess whether different stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity defined according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria correlate with meaningful differences in health status.A total of 381 COPD patients, aged 73±6 yrs, were classified in the five GOLD stages. Disease-specific (St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and generic indexes of health status were measured in all patients. Multivariate analysis of covariance or Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare health status indexes across the spectrum of GOLD stages of COPD severity.GOLD stages of COPD severity significantly differed in SGRQ components and Barthel's index, but not in the indexes assessing cognitive and affective status and quality of sleep. The largest variation in health status was observed at the transition from stage IIa to stage IIb, while there were no other significant differences between consecutive stages. Both female sex and comorbidity were associated with a greater impact of COPD on the health status.In conclusion, the upper limit of stage IIb (forced expiratory volume in one second of 49%) marks a threshold for dramatic worsening of health status. Progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity from stage 0 to stage IIa does not correspond to any meaningful difference in health status.

3 June 2020 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMatteo Bonini
Matteo Bonini
MPMarcello Di Paolo
Marcello Di Paolo
DBDiego Bagnasco
Diego Bagnasco
IBIlaria Baiardini
Ilaria Baiardini
FBFulvio Braido
Fulvio Braido
GCGiorgio W. Canonica
Giorgio W. Canonica
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient's medical management.The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a “state-of-the-art” review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors.