Konstantina Karamanou

Dr. Konstantina Karamanou

Department of Biotechnology, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2016 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zoi PiperigkouZoi Piperigkou
Zoi Piperigkou
Konstantina KaramanouKonstantina Karamanou
Konstantina Karamanou
AEAyse Basak Engin
Ayse Basak Engin
CGChrysostomi Gialeli
Chrysostomi Gialeli
Anca Oana DoceaAnca Oana Docea
Anca Oana Docea
Aristidis TsatsakisAristidis Tsatsakis
Aristidis Tsatsakis

17 July 2021 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGerasimos Daras
Gerasimos Daras
DTDimitrios Templalexis
Dimitrios Templalexis
FAFengoula Avgeri
Fengoula Avgeri
DTDikran Tsitsekian
Dikran Tsitsekian
Konstantina KaramanouKonstantina Karamanou
Konstantina Karamanou
SRStamatis Rigas
Stamatis Rigas
The wall is the last frontier of a plant cell involved in modulating growth, development and defense against biotic stresses. Cellulose and additional polysaccharides of plant cell walls are the most abundant biopolymers on earth, having increased in economic value and thereby attracted significant interest in biotechnology. Cellulose biosynthesis constitutes a highly complicated process relying on the formation of cellulose synthase complexes. Cellulose synthase (CesA) and Cellulose synthase-like (Csl) genes encode enzymes that synthesize cellulose and most hemicellulosic polysaccharides. Arabidopsis and rice are invaluable genetic models and reliable representatives of land plants to comprehend cell wall synthesis. During the past two decades, enormous research progress has been made to understand the mechanisms of cellulose synthesis and construction of the plant cell wall. A plethora of cesa and csl mutants have been characterized, providing functional insights into individual protein isoforms. Recent structural studies have uncovered the mode of CesA assembly and the dynamics of cellulose production. Genetics and structural biology have generated new knowledge and have accelerated the pace of discovery in this field, ultimately opening perspectives towards cellulose synthesis manipulation. This review provides an overview of the major breakthroughs gathering previous and recent genetic and structural advancements, focusing on the function of CesA and Csl catalytic domain in plants.

11 March 2020 in The FEBS Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Konstantina KaramanouKonstantina Karamanou
Konstantina Karamanou
Marco FranchiMarco Franchi
Marco Franchi
Maurizio OnistoMaurizio Onisto
Maurizio Onisto
Alberto PassiAlberto Passi
Alberto Passi
DVDemitrios Vynios
Demitrios Vynios
SBstephane BREZILLON
stephane BREZILLON
The small leucine‐rich proteoglycan lumican regulates estrogen receptors (ERs)‐associated functional properties of breast cancer cells, expression of matrix macromolecules, and epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition. However, it is not known whether the ER‐dependent lumican effects on breast cancer cells are related to the expression of integrins and their intracellular signaling pathways. Here, we analyzed the effects of lumican in three breast cancer cell lines: the highly metastatic ERβ‐positive MDA‐MB‐231, cells with the respective ERβ‐suppressed (shERβMDA‐MB‐231), and lowly invasive ERα‐positive MCF‐7/c breast cancer cells. Scanning electron microscopy, confocal microscopy, real‐time PCR, western blot, and cell adhesion assays were performed. Lumican effects on breast cancer cell morphology were also investigated in 3‐dimensional collagen cultures. Lumican treatment induced cell–cell contacts and cell grouping and inhibited microvesicles and microvilli formation. The expression of the cell surface adhesion receptor CD44, its isoform and variants, hyaluronan (HA), and HA synthases was also investigated. Lumican inhibited the expression of CD44 and HA synthases, and its effect on cell adhesion revealed a major role of α1, α2, α3, αVβ3, and αVβ5 integrins in MDA‐MB‐231 cells, but not in MCF‐7/c cells. Lumican upregulated the expression of α2 and β1 integrin subunits both in MDA‐MB‐231 and in shERβMDA‐MB‐231 as compared to MCF‐7/c cells. Downstream signaling pathways for integrins, such as FAK, ERK 1/2 MAPK 42/44, and Akt, were found to be downregulated by lumican. Our data shed light to the molecular mechanisms responsible for the anticancer activity of lumican in invasive breast cancer.

8 April 2021 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Konstantina KaramanouKonstantina Karamanou
Konstantina Karamanou
Marco FranchiMarco Franchi
Marco Franchi
PIProult Isabelle
Proult Isabelle
RRRomain RIVET
Romain RIVET
DVDemitrios Vynios
Demitrios Vynios
SBstephane BREZILLON
stephane BREZILLON
It was reported that lumican inhibits the activity of metalloproteinase MMP-14 and melanoma cell migration in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, Snail triggers epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and the metastatic potential of cancer cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of lumican on Mock and Snail overexpressing melanoma B16F1 cells in vivo. Lung metastasis was analyzed after intravenous injections of Mock-B16F1 and Snail-B16F1 cells in Lum+/+ and Lum−/− mice. At day 14, mice were sacrificed, and lungs were collected. The number of lung metastatic nodules was significantly higher in mice injected with Snail-B16F1 cells as compared to mice injected with Mock-B16F1 cells confirming the pro-metastatic effect of Snail. This effect was stronger in Lum−/− mice as compared to Lum+/+, suggesting that endogenous lumican of wild-type mice significantly inhibits metastasis to lungs. Scanning electron and confocal microscopy investigations demonstrated that lumican inhibits the development of elongated cancer cell phenotypes which are known to develop invadopodia releasing MMPs. Moreover, lumican was shown to affect the expression of cyclin D1, cortactin, vinculin, hyaluronan synthase 2, heparanase, MMP-14 and the phosphorylation of FAK, AKT, p130 Cas and GSK3α/β. Altogether, these data demonstrated that lumican significantly inhibits lung metastasis in vivo, as well as cell invasion in vitro, suggesting that a lumican-based strategy targeting Snail-induced metastasis could be useful for melanoma treatment.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTDikran Tsitsekian
Dikran Tsitsekian
GDGerasimos Daras
Gerasimos Daras
Konstantina KaramanouKonstantina Karamanou
Konstantina Karamanou
DTDimitrios Templalexis
Dimitrios Templalexis
KKKonstantinos Koudounas
Konstantinos Koudounas
SRStamatis Rigas
Stamatis Rigas
The gram-positive pathogenic bacterium Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) causes bacterial canker disease in tomato, affecting crop yield and fruit quality. To understand how tomato plants respond, the dynamic expression profile of host genes was analyzed upon Cmm infection. Symptoms of bacterial canker became evident from the third day. As the disease progressed, the bacterial population increased in planta, reaching the highest level at six days and remained constant till the twelfth day post inoculation. These two time points were selected for transcriptomics. A progressive down-regulation of key genes encoding for components of the photosynthetic apparatus was observed. Two temporally separated defense responses were observed, which were to an extent interdependent. During the primary response, genes of the phenylpropanoid pathway were diverted towards the synthesis of monolignols away from S-lignin. In dicots, lignin polymers mainly consist of G- and S-units, playing an important role in defense. The twist towards G-lignin enrichment is consistent with previous findings, highlighting a response to generate an early protective barrier and to achieve a tight interplay between lignin recomposition and the primary defense response mechanism. Upon progression of Cmm infection, the temporal deactivation of phenylpropanoids coincided with the upregulation of genes that belong in a secondary response mechanism, supporting an elegant reprogramming of the host transcriptome to establish a robust defense apparatus and suppress pathogen invasion. This high-throughput analysis reveals a dynamic reorganization of plant defense mechanisms upon bacterial infection to implement an array of barriers preventing pathogen invasion and spread.

30 September 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJonathan Dauvé
Jonathan Dauvé
NBNicolas Belloy
Nicolas Belloy
RRRomain RIVET
Romain RIVET
NENicolas ETIQUE
Nicolas ETIQUE
PNPierre Nizet
Pierre Nizet
Stephanie BaudStephanie Baud
Stephanie Baud
Lumican, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) of the extracellular matrix (ECM), displays anti-tumor properties through its direct interaction with MMP-14. Lumican-derived peptides, such as lumcorin (17 amino acids) or L9M (10 amino acids), are able to inhibit the proteolytic activity of MMP-14 and melanoma progression. This work aimed to visualize the interactions of lumican-derived peptides and MMP-14. Molecular modeling was used to characterize the interactions between lumican-derived peptides, such as lumcorin, L9M, and cyclic L9M (L9Mc, 12 amino acids), and MMP-14. The interaction of L9Mc with MMP-14 was preferential with the MT-Loop domain while lumcorin interacted more with the catalytic site. Key residues in the MMP-14 amino acid sequence were highlighted for the interaction between the inhibitory SLRP-derived peptides and MMP-14. In order to validate the in silico data, MMP-14 activity and migration assays were performed using murine B16F1 and human HT-144 melanoma cells. In contrast to the HT-144 melanoma cell line, L9Mc significantly inhibited the migration of B16F1 cells and the activity of MMP-14 but with less efficacy than lumican and lumcorin. L9Mc significantly inhibited the proliferation of B16F1 but not of HT-144 cells in vitro and primary melanoma tumor growth in vivo. Thus, the site of interaction between the domains of MMP-14 and lumcorin or L9Mc were different, which might explain the differences in the inhibitory effect of MMP-14 activity. Altogether, the biological assays validated the prediction of the in silico study. Possible and feasible improvements include molecular dynamics results.