Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers requiring early pathologic diagnosis using colonoscopy biopsy samples. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant progress and shown promising results in the field of medicine despite several limitations. We performed a systematic review of AI use in CRC pathology image analysis to visualize the state-of-the-art. Studies published between January 2000 and January 2020 were searched in major online databases including MEDLINE (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE). Query terms included “colorectal neoplasm,” “histology,” and “artificial intelligence.” Of 9000 identified studies, only 30 studies consisting of 40 models were selected for review. The algorithm features of the models were gland segmentation (n = 25, 62%), tumor classification (n = 8, 20%), tumor microenvironment characterization (n = 4, 10%), and prognosis prediction (n = 3, 8%). Only 20 gland segmentation models met the criteria for quantitative analysis, and the model proposed by Ding et al. (2019) performed the best. Studies with other features were in the elementary stage, although most showed impressive results. Overall, the state-of-the-art is promising for CRC pathological analysis. However, datasets in most studies had relatively limited scale and quality for clinical application of this technique. Future studies with larger datasets and high-quality annotations are required for routine practice-level validation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be a solution for delayed or misdiagnosed pneumothorax. This study developed, a deep-learning-based AI model to estimate the pneumothorax amount on a chest radiograph and applied it to a treatment algorithm developed by experienced thoracic surgeons. U-net performed semantic segmentation and classification of pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax areas. The pneumothorax amount was measured using chest computed tomography (volume ratio, gold standard) and chest radiographs (area ratio, true label) and calculated using the AI model (area ratio, predicted label). Each value was compared and analyzed based on clinical outcomes. The study included 96 patients, of which 67 comprised the training set and the others the test set. The AI model showed an accuracy of 97.8%, sensitivity of 69.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.1%, and a dice similarity coefficient of 61.8%. In the test set, the average amount of pneumothorax was 15%, 16%, and 13% in the gold standard, predicted, and true labels, respectively. The predicted label was not significantly different from the gold standard (p = 0.11) but inferior to the true label (difference in MAE: 3.03%). The amount of pneumothorax in thoracostomy patients was 21.6% in predicted cases and 18.5% in true cases.