In chronic kidney disease (CKD), accumulation of uremic toxins is associated with an increased risk of CKD progression. Some uremic toxins result from nutrient processing by gut microbiota, yielding precursors of uremic toxins or uremic toxins themselves, such as trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO), p-cresyl sulphate, indoxyl sulphate and indole-3 acetic acid. Increased intake of some nutrients may modify the gut microbiota, increasing the number of bacteria that process them to yield uremic toxins. Circulating levels of nutrient-derived uremic toxins are associated to increased risk of CKD progression. This offers the opportunity for therapeutic intervention by either modifying the diet, modifying the microbiota, decreasing uremic toxin production by microbiota, increasing toxin excretion or targeting specific uremic toxins. We now review the link between nutrients, microbiota and uremic toxin with CKD progression. Specific focus will be placed on the generation specific uremic toxins with nephrotoxic potential, the decreased availability of bacteria-derived metabolites with nephroprotective potential, such as vitamin K and butyrate and the cellular and molecular mechanisms linking these toxins and protective factors to kidney diseases. This information provides a conceptual framework that allows the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

In the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, empagliflozin reduced cardiorenal outcomes by 28% (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.64–0.82; P < 0.0001) in a diverse population of over 6000 CKD patients, of whom > 50% were not diabetic. It expanded the spectrum of CKD that may benefit from SGLT2 inhibition to participants with urinary albumin: creatinine ratio 20 ml/min/1.73 m² or even lower (254 participants had an eGFR 15-20 ml/min/1.73 m²). EMPA-KIDNEY was stopped prematurely because of efficacy, thus limiting the ability to confirm benefit on the primary outcome in every pre-specified subgroup, especially in those with more slowly progressive CKD. However, data on chronic eGFR slopes were consistent with benefit at any eGFR or UACR level potentially delaying kidney replacement therapy by 2 to 27 years, depending on baseline eGFR. The representation of diverse causes of CKD (>1600 participants with glomerular disease, >1400 with hypertensive kidney disease, >450 with tubulointerstitial disease and > 600 with unknown cause) was higher than in prior SGLT2 inhibitor trials, although polycystic kidney disease was excluded. Around 15% (almost 1000) participants were not on RAS blockade. The clinical characteristics of the cohort differed from DAPA-CKD, as did the frequency of individual components of the primary outcome in the placebo arm. Thus, rather than compare EMPA-KIDNEY to DAPA-CKD, the results of both trials should be seen as complementary with those of other SGLT2 inhibitor trials. Overall, EMPA-KIDNEY, a recent metanalysis and post-hoc analyses of participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but no baseline CKD in other trials indicate that SGLT2 inhibitor treatment will benefit an expanded CKD population with diverse baseline albuminuria or eGFR values, presence of T2DM, or cause of CKD, as well as provide primary prevention of CKD in at least the T2DM setting.

Chronic kidney disease is among the fastest growing causes of death worldwide. An increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death is thought to depend on the accumulation of uremic toxins when glomerular filtration rate falls. In addition, the circulating levels of several markers of inflammation predict mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. Indeed, a number of cytokines are listed in databases of uremic toxins and uremic retention solutes. They include inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18, IL-6, TNFα), chemokines (IL-8), and adipokines (adiponectin, leptin and resistin), as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10). We now critically review the cytokines that may be considered uremic toxins. We discuss the rationale to consider them uremic toxins (mechanisms underlying the increased serum levels and evidence supporting their contribution to CKD manifestations), identify gaps in knowledge, discuss potential therapeutic implications to be tested in clinical trials in order to make this knowledge useful for the practicing physician, and identify additional cytokines, cytokine receptors and chemokines that may fulfill the criteria to be considered uremic toxins, such as sIL-6R, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, IL-2, CXCL12, CX3CL1 and others. In addition, we suggest that IL-10, leptin, adiponectin and resistin should not be considered uremic toxins toxins based on insufficient or contradictory evidence of an association with adverse outcomes in humans or preclinical data not consistent with a causal association.

Introduction: The age-standardized death rate from diabetic kidney disease increased by 106% from 1990 to 2013, indicating that novel therapeutic approaches are needed, in addition to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers currently in use. Clinical trial results of anti-fibrotic therapy have been disappointing. However, promising anti-inflammatory drugs are currently on phase 1 and 2 randomized controlled trials. Areas covered: The authors review the preclinical, phase 1 and 2 clinical trial information of drugs tested for diabetic kidney disease that directly target inflammation as a main or key mode of action. Agents mainly targeting other pathways, such as endothelin receptor or mineralocorticoid receptor blockers and vitamin D receptor activators are not discussed. Expert opinion: Agents targeting inflammation have shown promising results in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease when added on top of RAS blockade. The success of pentoxifylline in open label trials supports the concept of targeting inflammation. In early clinical trials, the pentoxifylline derivative CTP-499, the CCR2 inhibitor CCX140-B, the CCL2 inhibitor emapticap pegol and the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib were the most promising drugs for diabetic kidney disease. The termination of trials testing the anti-IL-1β antibody gevokizumab in 2015 will postpone the evaluation of therapies targeting inflammatory cytokines.

Tirzepatide is a twincretin recently approved to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). More specifically, tirzepatide is an agonist of both the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) receptors. In recent clinical trials in persons with obesity or overweight with associated conditions, tirzepatide decreased body weight and other cardiorenal risk factors (blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin and albuminuria). Moreover, in a post hoc analysis of the SURPASS-4 randomized clinical trial, tirzepatide decreased albuminuria and total estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes and nearly halved the risk of a pre-specified composite kidney endpoint (eGFR decline ≥40%, renal death, kidney failure or new-onset macroalbuminuria) in participants with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk when compared with insulin glargine. Similar to other kidney-protective drugs, tirzepatide, alone or combined with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, caused an early dip in eGFR. Moreover, tirzepatide also decreased eGFR slopes in participants with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m² or with normoalbuminuria. We now review the potential kidney health implications of tirzepatide, addressing its structure and function, relationship to current GLP1 receptor agonists, impact of recent results for the treatment and prevention of kidney disease, and expectations for the future.