This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Rapid industrial development has caused a series of environmental problems, which is not conducive to sustainable development of society as a whole. It is necessary to build a sustainable development evaluation system. Most of the existing literature has evaluated corporate sustainable performance from the economy, environment and society on the basis of triple bottom lines. Considering the research gap and the practice need, an evaluation system is established from four dimensions, referred to as economy, society, environment and responsibility management, and 29 indicators are designed to measure these four dimensions. Twenty seven listed Chinese mining corporations are selected as research samples, and the entropy-weight-based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is applied to calculate indicators’ weights. Results show that the four dimensions of sustainable performance weights from high to low are society, environment, economy, and management process.
Yuan Ma; Jingzhi Men; Mingyu Li; Xiaoyan Li. Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations. Entropy 2021, 23, 349 .
AMA StyleYuan Ma, Jingzhi Men, Mingyu Li, Xiaoyan Li. Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations. Entropy. 2021; 23 (3):349.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuan Ma; Jingzhi Men; Mingyu Li; Xiaoyan Li. 2021. "Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations." Entropy 23, no. 3: 349.
Environmental education pedagogy is divided into two categories: teacher-driven pedagogy and student-driven pedagogy. Their impacts on the environmental awareness of college students are analyzed using the propensity score matching method. The analysis results for 485 survey data points from college students show that both of these two pedagogies influence college students’ environmental awareness positively, and the effect of student-driven pedagogy is higher. The conclusion provides insight for the further development of college students’ environmental education.
Yuan Ma; Jingzhi Men; Wei Cui. Does Environmental Education Matter? Evidence from Provincial Higher Education Institutions in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6338 .
AMA StyleYuan Ma, Jingzhi Men, Wei Cui. Does Environmental Education Matter? Evidence from Provincial Higher Education Institutions in China. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (16):6338.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuan Ma; Jingzhi Men; Wei Cui. 2020. "Does Environmental Education Matter? Evidence from Provincial Higher Education Institutions in China." Sustainability 12, no. 16: 6338.