Sandra Nuyts

Prof. Dr. Sandra Nuyts

Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2006 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPiet Dirix
Piet Dirix
Sandra NuytsSandra Nuyts
Sandra Nuyts
WBWalter Van Den Bogaert
Walter Van Den Bogaert

1 April 2009 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VVVincent Vandecaveye
Vincent Vandecaveye
FKFrederik De Keyzer
Frederik De Keyzer
VPVincent Vander Poorten
Vincent Vander Poorten
PDPiet Dirix
Piet Dirix
EVEric Verbeken
Eric Verbeken
RHRobert Hermans
Robert Hermans
To evaluate diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, as compared with turbo spin-echo MR imaging, for the detection of nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study was approved by the ethics committee, and patients gave written informed consent. Before undergoing surgery, 33 consecutive patients underwent 1.5-T MR imaging, including DW imaging performed with a wide range of b values (0-1000 sec/mm(2)). The apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of lymph nodes 4 mm or greater in short-axis diameter depicted on images obtained with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) were calculated. After topographic correlation, the lymph nodes were evaluated microscopically with prekeratin immunostaining. The optimal ADC thresholds for discriminating between metastatic and benign lymph nodes were determined. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW imaging were calculated separately-on per-lymph-node and per-neck-level bases-for all lymph nodes and for supracentimeter and subcentimeter lymph nodes and were compared with corresponding turbo spin-echo MR imaging values. Correlation of histopathologic and radiologic findings was possible for 301 lymph nodes. The ADC derived from the signal intensity averaged across images obtained with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) (ADC(b0-1000)) was 1.19 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.22 (standard deviation) for benign lymph nodes and 0.85 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.27 for malignant lymph nodes (P < .0001). With an optimal ADC(b0-1000) threshold of 0.94 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, 84% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 91% accuracy for differentiation of malignant versus benign status of each lymph node and 94% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 97% accuracy for differentiation at each neck level were achieved. Compared with turbo spin-echo imaging, DW imaging had higher sensitivity (76% vs 7%) but slightly lower specificity (94.0% vs 99.5%) for detection of subcentimeter nodal metastases. DW imaging performed with ADC(b0-1000) values had higher accuracy than turbo spin-echo MR imaging in nodal staging, providing added value in the detection of subcentimeter nodal metastases.

1 March 2007 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VVVincent Vandecaveye
Vincent Vandecaveye
FKFrederik De Keyzer
Frederik De Keyzer
Sandra NuytsSandra Nuyts
Sandra Nuyts
KDKaren Deraedt
Karen Deraedt
PDPiet Dirix
Piet Dirix
RHRobert Hermans
Robert Hermans

24 February 2010 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VVVincent Vandecaveye
Vincent Vandecaveye
PDPiet Dirix
Piet Dirix
FKFrederik De Keyzer
Frederik De Keyzer
KBKatya Op de Beeck
Katya Op de Beeck
Vincent Vander PoortenVincent Vander Poorten
Vincent Vander Poorten
RHRobert Hermans
Robert Hermans

10 October 2015 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVincent Grégoire
Vincent Grégoire
JLJohannes A. Langendijk
Johannes A. Langendijk
Sandra NuytsSandra Nuyts
Sandra Nuyts
Over the last few decades, significant improvements have been made in the radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head and neck malignancies. The progressive introduction of intensity-modulated RT and the use of multimodality imaging for target volume and organs at risk delineation, together with the use of altered fractionation regimens and concomitant administration of chemotherapy or targeted agents, have accompanied efficacy improvements in RT. Altogether, such improvements have translated into improvement in locoregional control and overall survival probability, with a decrease in the long-term adverse effects of RT and an improvement in quality of life. Further progress in the treatment of head and neck malignancies may come from a better integration of molecular imaging to identify tumor subvolumes that may require additional radiation doses (ie, dose painting) and from treatment adaptation tracing changes in patient anatomy during treatment. Proton therapy generates even more exquisite dose distribution in some patients, thus potentially further improving patient outcomes. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches, although promising, for patients with head and neck cancer need to be demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. In this context, our article will review some of these advances, with special emphasis on target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, use of molecular imaging for tumor delineation, dose painting for dose escalation, dose adaptation throughout treatment, and potential benefit of proton therapy.

12 June 2009 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPiet Dirix
Piet Dirix
VVVincent Vandecaveye
Vincent Vandecaveye
FKFrederik De Keyzer
Frederik De Keyzer
SSSigrid Stroobants
Sigrid Stroobants
RHRobert Hermans
Robert Hermans
Sandra NuytsSandra Nuyts
Sandra Nuyts
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the potential of functional imaging with 18F-FDG PET, 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET, diffusion-weighted MRI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to provide an appropriate and reliable biologic target for dose painting in radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: Fifteen patients with locally advanced HNSCC, treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy, were prospectively enrolled in a bioimaging protocol. Sequential PET (18F-FDG and 18F-fluoromisonidazole) and MRI (T1, T2, dynamic enhanced, and diffusion-weighted sequences) were performed before, during, and after radiotherapy. Results: Median follow-up was 30.7 mo (range, 6.3–56.3 mo); in 7 patients, disease recurred. Disease-free survival correlated negatively with the maximum tissue-to-blood 18F-fluoromisonidazole ratio (T/Bmax) on the baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole scan (P = 0.04), with the size of the initial hypoxic volume (P = 0.04), and with T/Bmax on the 18F-fluoromisonidazole scan during treatment (P = 0.02). All locoregional recurrences were within the 18F-FDG–avid regions on baseline 18F-FDG PET; 3 recurrences mapped outside the hypoxic volume on baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET. Lesions (primary tumor and lymph nodes) where a locoregional recurrence developed during follow-up had significantly lower apparent diffusion coefficients on diffusion-weighted MRI during week 4 of radiotherapy (0.0013 vs. 0.0018 mm2/s, P = 0.01) and at 3 wk after treatment (0.0014 vs. 0.0018 mm2/s, P = 0.01) and a significantly higher initial slope on baseline dynamic enhanced MRI (26.2 vs. 17.5/s, P = 0.03) than did lesions that remained controlled. Conclusion: These results confirm the added value of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET for radiotherapy planning of HNSCC and suggest the potential of diffusion-weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI for dose painting and early response assessment.