Daniel Cook

Dr. Daniel Cook

School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, United States
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2010 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LDLaura A. Davidson
Laura A. Davidson
CPClare T. Pettis
Clare T. Pettis
AJAmber J. Joiner
Amber J. Joiner
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook
CKCraig M. Klugman
Craig M. Klugman

15 July 2019 in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RPRoman Pabayo
Roman Pabayo
AEAmy Ehntholt
Amy Ehntholt
KDKia Davis
Kia Davis
SLSze Yan Liu
Sze Yan Liu
PMPeter Muennig
Peter Muennig
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook

8 August 2018 in Journal of General Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAHéctor E. Alcalá
Héctor E. Alcalá
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook

1 July 2005 in American Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAnnamaria Baba
Annamaria Baba
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook
TMThomas O. McGarity
Thomas O. McGarity
LBLisa A. Bero
Lisa A. Bero
In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate “sound science.” The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to reanalyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and workgroups, develop a “data integrity” outreach program, sponsor symposia on “research integrity,” and draft language for the new acts. The tobacco industry played a role in establishing laws that increase corporate influence on public health and regulatory policy decisions.

RPRoman Pabayo
Roman Pabayo
AEAmy Ehntholt
Amy Ehntholt
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook
MRMegan Reynolds
Megan Reynolds
PMPeter Muennig
Peter Muennig
SLSze Yan Liu
Sze Yan Liu
Objectives: Since the US Supreme Court′s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, states have enacted laws restricting access to abortion services. Previous studies suggest that restricting access to abortion is a risk factor for adverse maternal and infant health. The objective of this investigation is to study the relationship between the type and the number of state-level restrictive abortion laws and infant mortality risk. Methods: We used data on 11,972,629 infants and mothers from the US Cohort Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Files 2008–2010. State-level abortion laws included Medicaid funding restrictions, mandatory parental involvement, mandatory counseling, mandatory waiting period, and two-visit laws. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether type or number of state-level restrictive abortion laws during year of birth were associated with odds of infant mortality. Results: Compared to infants living in states with no restrictive laws, infants living in states with one or two restrictive laws (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99–1.18) and those living in states with 3 to 5 restrictive laws (AOR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.01–1.20) were more likely to die. Separate analyses examining the relationship between parental involvement laws and infant mortality risk, stratified by maternal age, indicated that significant associations were observed among mothers aged ≤19 years (AOR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.19), and 20 to 25 years (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17). No significant association was observed among infants born to older mothers. Conclusion: Restricting access to abortion services may increase the risk for infant mortality.

5 December 2007 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniel Cook
Daniel Cook
EBElizabeth A. Boyd
Elizabeth A. Boyd
CGClaudia Grossmann
Claudia Grossmann
LBLisa A. Bero
Lisa A. Bero
Forthright reporting of financial ties and conflicts of interest of researchers is associated with public trust in and esteem for the scientific enterprise. We searched Lexis/Nexis Academic News for the top news stories in science published in 2004 and 2005. We conducted a content analysis of 1152 newspaper stories. Funders of the research were identified in 38% of stories, financial ties of the researchers were reported in 11% of stories, and 5% reported financial ties of sources quoted. Of 73 stories not reporting on financial ties, 27% had financial ties publicly disclosed in scholarly journals. Because science journalists often did not report conflict of interest information, adherence to gold-standard recommendations for science journalism was low. Journalists work under many different constraints, but nonetheless news reports of scientific research were incomplete, potentially eroding public trust in science.