Growing a crop in place of fallow may improve soil properties but result in reduced soil water and crop yields in semiarid regions. This study assessed the effect of replacing fallow in no‐till winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow with cover, forage, or grain crops on plant available water (PAW), wheat yield, grain quality, and profitability over 5 yr, from 2007 to 2012. Plant available water at wheat planting was reduced the most when the fallow period was the shortest (i.e., following grain crops) or when biomass production was the greatest. Winter and spring lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) produced the least biomass, used the least soil water, and had the least negative effect on yield. For every 125 kg ha⁻¹ of cover or forage biomass grown, PAW was reduced by 1 mm, and for every millimeter of PAW, wheat yield was increased by 5.5 kg ha⁻¹. There was no difference in wheat yield whether the preceding crop was harvested for forage or left as standing cover. In years with above‐average precipitation, wheat yield was reduced 0 to 34% by growing a crop in place of fallow. However, in years with below‐average precipitation, wheat yield was reduced 40 to 70% without fallow. There was minimal negative impact on wheat yield growing a cover or forage crop in place of fallow if wheat yield potential was 3500 kg ha⁻¹ or greater. Net returns were reduced 50 to 100% by growing a cover crop. However, net returns were increased 26 to 240% by growing a forage crop. Integrating annual forages into the fallow period in semiarid regions has the greatest potential for adoption.

The widespread evolution of herbicide resistance in weed populations has become an increasing concern for no-tillage (NT) growers in semiarid regions of the U.S. Great Plains. Lack of cost-effective and alternative new herbicide sites of action further exacerbates the problem of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds and threatens the long-term sustainability of prevailing cropping systems in the region. A recent decline in commodity prices and increasing herbicide costs to manage HR weeds has spurred research efforts to build a strong rationale for developing ecologically based integrated weed management (IWM) strategies in the U.S. Great Plains. Integration of cover crops (CCs) in NT dryland production systems potentially offers several ecosystem services, including weed control, soil health improvement, decline in selective pest pressure, and overall reduction in pest management inputs. This review article aims to document the role of CCs for IWM, with emphasis on exploring emerging weed issues; ecological, economic, and agronomic benefits of growing CCs; and constraints preventing adoption of CCs in NT cropping systems in the semiarid Great Plains. We attempt to focus on changes in weed management practices, their long-term impacts on weed seedbanks, weed shifts, and herbicide-resistance evolution in the most common weed species in the region. We also highlight current knowledge gaps and propose new research priorities based on an improved understanding of CC management strategies that will ultimately aid in achieving sustainable weed management goals and preserving natural resources in water-limited environments.

Core Ideas: Genotype × environment affected camelina seed yield, oil and constituent fatty acids. Blaine Creek produced the greatest seed among the camelina genotypes studied. Camelina grown at Hays, KS, had less yields and oil content compared to Moccasin, MT. Camelina at Moccasin, MT had greater linolenic acid content compared to Hays, KS. Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) is an alternative oilseed crop with potential for fallow replacement in dryland cereal‐based crop production systems in the semiarid Great Plains. The interaction between genotype and environment was investigated on camelina seed yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition across two locations in the U.S. Great Plains. Treatments were three spring camelina genotypes (cultivars Blaine Creek, Pronghorn, and Shoshone), three growing seasons (2013, 2014, and 2015) and two locations (at Hays, KS, and Moccasin, MT). Results showed camelina grown at Hays yielded 54% less than that at Moccasin. Blaine Creek yielded 17 and 42% more than Pronghorn and Shoshone at Hays but yields were not different among genotypes at Moccasin. Oil content ranged from 262 g kg⁻¹ at Hays to 359 g kg⁻¹ at Moccasin. The proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) ranged from 51% at Hays to 55% at Moccasin, whereas monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) and saturated fatty acid (SFA) contents were greater at Hays. The linolenic acid content ranged from 26% when Pronghorn was planted at Hays to 35% when planted at Moccasin. In general, the variations in seed yield and fatty acid profile corresponded well with growing season precipitation and temperatures at each environment.

Long-term no-till (NT) systems in the semiarid central Great Plains of the United States require flexible management strategies to minimize the impacts of herbicide resistant (HR) kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) and tumble windmill grass (Chloris verticillata Nutt.) as well as nutrient stratification on soil and crop productivity. This study examined strategic tillage (ST) to control HR weeds and improve crop yields in an otherwise long-term NT cropping system. Treatments were three crop rotations: (1) continuous winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (WW); (2) wheat-fallow (WF); and (3) wheat-grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)-fallow (WSF); as main plots. Subplots were reduced tillage (RT), continuous NT, and ST of NT. Results showed ST and RT treatments provided significant control of HR weeds. Soil water content at wheat planting was significantly less with RT compared to NT or ST. Strategic tillage did not affect wheat or grain sorghum yields, but RT decreased sorghum yields by 15% compared to NT. Increasing cropping intensity reduced wheat yields. Strategic tillage reduced bulk density and had no effect on aggregate size distribution or mean weight diameter (MWD) compared to NT though RT reduced the proportion of large macroaggregates and MWD. Similarly, ST compared to NT had no effect on soil organic carbon (SOC) or nitrogen (N) concentrations. Soil phosphorus (P) was not different among the tillage treatments though RT increased potassium (K) concentration near the soil surface. The SOC, MWD, and micronutrient availability were greatest with WW though it had significantly lower pH and K concentration. Our results suggest ST could provide a mitigation option for HR weeds in NT systems with little impact on crop yields and soil properties.