Stefan Toepfer

Dr. Stefan Toepfer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 March 2021 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STStefan Toepfer
Stefan Toepfer
PFPatrick Fallet
Patrick Fallet
JKJoelle Kajuga
Joelle Kajuga
BDBazagwira Didace
Bazagwira Didace
IMIshimwe Primitive Mukundwa
Ishimwe Primitive Mukundwa
TTTed Christiaan Joannes Turlings
Ted Christiaan Joannes Turlings
The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda, Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), which is native to the Americas, has recently invaded Africa and Asia. There, it has become a major pest of maize (Zea mays). The variety of methods used to assess feeding damage caused by its caterpillars makes it difficult to compare studies. In this paper, we aim at determining which leaf damage rating scales for fall armyworm are most consistently used for which purposes, might provide most possibilities for statistical analyses, and would be an acceptable compromise between detail and workload. We first conducted a literature review and then validated the most common scales under field and laboratory conditions. Common leaf damage scales are the nominal “yes-no damage scale” that only assesses damage incidence, as well as difficult-to-analyse ordinal scales which combine incidence and severity information such as the “Simple 1 to 5 whole plant damage scale”, “Davis’ 0 to 9 whorl & furl damage scale”, or “Williams’ 0 to 9 whole plant damage scale”. These scales have been adapted many times, are sometimes used incorrectly, or were wrongly cited. We therefore propose simplifications of some of these scales as well as a novel “0.0 to 4.0 fall armyworm leaf damage index” which improves precision and possibilities for parametric data analyses. We argue that the choice of a scale to use should depend on the desired level of detail, type of data analyses envisioned, and manageable time investment.

18 March 2008 in BioControl
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKB. Kurtz
B. Kurtz
Ivan HiltpoldIvan Hiltpold
Ivan Hiltpold
TTT. C. J. Turlings
T. C. J. Turlings
UKU. Kuhlmann
U. Kuhlmann
STStefan Toepfer
Stefan Toepfer

21 February 2009 in BioControl
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPChristina Pilz
Christina Pilz
SKSiegfried Keller
Siegfried Keller
UKUlrich Kuhlmann
Ulrich Kuhlmann
STStefan Toepfer
Stefan Toepfer

3 November 2010 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMárk Szalai
Márk Szalai
JKJudit Papp Komáromi
Judit Papp Komáromi
Renata BazokRenata Bazok
Renata Bazok
JBJasminka Igrc Barčić
Jasminka Igrc Barčić
JKJózsef Kiss
József Kiss
STStefan Toepfer
Stefan Toepfer

27 February 2010 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STStefan Toepfer
Stefan Toepfer
BKBenedikt Kurtz
Benedikt Kurtz
UKUlrich Kuhlmann
Ulrich Kuhlmann
The use of entomopathogenic nematodes is one potential non-chemical approach to control the larvae of the invasive western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Europe. This study investigated the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae), Heterorhabditis megidis Poinar, Jackson and Klein (Rh., Heterorhabditidae) and Steinernema feltiae Filipjev (Rh., Steinernematidae) in reducing D. v. virgifera as a function of soil characteristics. A field experiment was repeated four times in southern Hungary using artificially infested maize plants potted into three different soils. Sleeve gauze cages were used to assess the number of emerging adult D. v. virgifera from the treatments and untreated controls. Results indicate that nematodes have the potential to reduce D. v. virgifera larvae in most soils; however, their efficacy can be higher in maize fields with heavy clay or silty clay soils than in sandy soils, which is in contrast to the common assumption that nematodes perform better in sandy soils than in heavy soils.

16 February 2022 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PFPatrick Fallet
Patrick Fallet
LGLara De Gianni
Lara De Gianni
RMRicardo A. R. Machado
Ricardo A. R. Machado
PBPamela Bruno
Pamela Bruno
JBJulio Bernal
Julio Bernal
TTTed Christiaan Joannes Turlings
Ted Christiaan Joannes Turlings
The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is an important pest of maize originating from the Americas. It recently invaded Africa and Asia, where it causes severe yield losses to maize. To fight this pest, tremendous quantities of synthetic insecticides are being used. As a safe and sustainable alternative, we explore the possibility to control FAW with entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN). We tested in the laboratory whether local EPNs, isolated in the invasive range of FAW, are as effective as EPNs from FAW native range or as commercially available EPNs. This work compared the virulence, killing speed and propagation capability of low doses of forty EPN strains, representing twelve species, after placing them with second-, third- and sixth-instar caterpillars as well as pupae. EPN isolated in the invasive range of FAW (Rwanda) were found to be as effective as commercial and EPNs from the native range of FAW (Mexico) at killing FAW caterpillars. In particular, the Rwandan Steinernema carpocapsae strain RW14-G-R3a-2 caused rapid 100% mortality of second- and third-instar and close to 75% of sixth-instar FAW caterpillars. EPN strains and concentrations used in this study were not effective in killing FAW pupae. Virulence varied greatly among EPN strains, underlining the importance of thorough EPN screenings. These findings will facilitate the development of local EPN-based biological control products for sustainable and environmentally friendly control of FAW in East Africa and beyond.