Lin Jin

Dr. Lin Jin

College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2014 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
HZHaonan Zhang
Haonan Zhang
YLYanhui Lu
Yanhui Lu
YYYihua Yang
Yihua Yang
KWKongming Wu
Kongming Wu
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu

11 June 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHaonan Zhang
Haonan Zhang
WTWen Tian
Wen Tian
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
JYJun Yang
Jun Yang
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu
Evolution of pest resistance reduces the efficacy of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) used in sprays or in transgenic crops. Although several pests have evolved resistance to Bt crops in the field, information about the genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Bt crops has been limited. In particular, laboratory-selected resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac based on recessive mutations in a gene encoding a toxin-binding cadherin protein has been identified in three major cotton pests, but previous work has not determined if such mutations are associated with field-selected resistance to Bt cotton. Here we show that the most common resistance alleles in field populations of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera , selected with Bt cotton in northern China, had recessive cadherin mutations, including the deletion mutation identified via laboratory selection. However, unlike all previously studied cadherin resistance alleles, one field-selected cadherin resistance allele conferred nonrecessive resistance. We also detected nonrecessive resistance that was not genetically linked with the cadherin locus. In field-selected populations, recessive cadherin alleles accounted for 75–84% of resistance alleles detected. However, most resistance alleles occurred in heterozygotes and 59–94% of resistant individuals carried at least one nonrecessive resistance allele. The results suggest that resistance management strategies must account for diverse resistance alleles in field-selected populations, including nonrecessive alleles.

9 August 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HZHaonan Zhang
Haonan Zhang
WYWei Yin
Wei Yin
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
YYYihua Yang
Yihua Yang
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu
Transgenic crops producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins kill some key insect pests, but evolution of resistance by pests can reduce their efficacy. The predominant strategy for delaying pest resistance to Bt crops requires refuges of non-Bt host plants to promote survival of susceptible pests. To delay pest resistance to transgenic cotton producing Bt toxin Cry1Ac, farmers in the United States and Australia planted refuges of non-Bt cotton, while farmers in China have relied on “natural” refuges of non-Bt host plants other than cotton. Here we report data from a 2010 survey showing field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac of the major target pest, cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera), in northern China. Laboratory bioassay results show that susceptibility to Cry1Ac was significantly lower in 13 field populations from northern China, where Bt cotton has been planted intensively, than in two populations from sites in northwestern China where exposure to Bt cotton has been limited. Susceptibility to Bt toxin Cry2Ab did not differ between northern and northwestern China, demonstrating that resistance to Cry1Ac did not cause cross-resistance to Cry2Ab, and implying that resistance to Cry1Ac in northern China is a specific adaptation caused by exposure to this toxin in Bt cotton. Despite the resistance detected in laboratory bioassays, control failures of Bt cotton have not been reported in China. This early warning may spur proactive countermeasures, including a switch to transgenic cotton producing two or more toxins distinct from Cry1A toxins.

31 October 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
FGFang Guan
Fang Guan
JZJianpeng Zhang
Jianpeng Zhang
SYShan Yu
Shan Yu
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu
Significance: Crops genetically engineered to produce insecticidal proteins from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) kill some major pests and reduce use of insecticide sprays. However, evolution of pest resistance to Bt proteins decreases these benefits. Better understanding of the genetic basis of resistance to Bt crops is urgently needed to address this problem. We discovered that a point mutation in the cotton bollworm, one of the world’s most voracious pests, confers dominantly inherited resistance to the Bt protein produced by transgenic cotton grown in China. This mutation increased 100-fold in frequency from 2006 to 2016 in China. Proactive tracking of this mutation may improve management of resistance and enhance sustainability of Bt cotton for millions of smallholder farmers in China.

17 September 2013 in Evolutionary Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
YWYiyun Wei
Yiyun Wei
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
YYYihua Yang
Yihua Yang
BTBruce E. Tabashnik
Bruce E. Tabashnik
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu
Evolution of resistance by insect pests threatens the long‐term benefits of transgenic crops that produce insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Previous work has detected increases in the frequency of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in populations of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, from northern China where Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac has been grown extensively for more than a decade. Confirming that trend, we report evidence from 2011 showing that the percentage of individuals resistant to a diagnostic concentration of Cry1Ac was significantly higher in two populations from different provinces of northern China (1.4% and 2.3%) compared with previously tested susceptible field populations (0%). We isolated two resistant strains: one from each of the two field‐selected populations. Relative to a susceptible strain, the two strains had 460‐ and 1200‐fold resistance to Cry1Ac, respectively. Both strains had dominant resistance to a diagnostic concentration of Cry1Ac in diet and to Bt cotton leaves containing Cry1Ac. Both strains had low, but significant cross‐resistance to Cry2Ab (4.2‐ and 5.9‐fold), which is used widely as the second toxin in two‐toxin Bt cotton. Compared with resistance in other strains of H. armigera, the resistance in the two strains characterized here may be especially difficult to suppress.

1 February 2010 in Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
Lin JinLin Jin
Lin Jin
YYYihua Yang
Yihua Yang
Yidong WuYidong Wu
Yidong Wu