Paul Robustelli

Dr. Paul Robustelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a valuable tool for characterizing the structural dynamics of folded proteins and should be similarly applicable to disordered proteins and proteins with both folded and disordered regions. It has been unclear, however, whether any physical model (force field) used in MD simulations accurately describes both folded and disordered proteins. Here, we select a benchmark set of 21 systems, including folded and disordered proteins, simulate these systems with six state-of-the-art force fields, and compare the results to over 9,000 available experimental data points. We find that none of the tested force fields simultaneously provided accurate descriptions of folded proteins, of the dimensions of disordered proteins, and of the secondary structure propensities of disordered proteins. Guided by simulation results on a subset of our benchmark, however, we modified parameters of one force field, achieving excellent agreement with experiment for disordered proteins, while maintaining state-of-the-art accuracy for folded proteins. The resulting force field, a99SB-disp, should thus greatly expand the range of biological systems amenable to MD simulation. A similar approach could be taken to improve other force fields. Significance Many proteins that perform important biological functions are completely or partially disordered under physiological conditions. Molecular dynamics simulations could be a powerful tool for the structural characterization of such proteins, but it has been unclear whether the physical models (force fields) used in simulations are sufficiently accurate. Here, we systematically compare the accuracy of a number of different force fields in simulations of both ordered and disordered proteins, finding that each force field has strengths and limitations. We then describe a force field that substantially improves on the state-of-the-art accuracy for simulations of disordered proteins without sacrificing accuracy for folded proteins, thus broadening the range of biological systems amenable to molecular dynamics simulations.

13 April 2015 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
ADAlexander G. Donchev
Alexander G. Donchev
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw
Many proteins can be partially or completely disordered under physiological conditions. Structural characterization of these disordered states using experimental methods can be challenging, since they are composed of a structurally heterogeneous ensemble of conformations rather than a single dominant conformation. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations should in principle provide an ideal tool for elucidating the composition and behavior of disordered states at an atomic level of detail. Unfortunately, MD simulations using current physics-based models tend to produce disordered-state ensembles that are structurally too compact relative to experiments. We find that the water models typically used in MD simulations significantly underestimate London dispersion interactions, and speculate that this may be a possible reason for these erroneous results. To test this hypothesis, we create a new water model, TIP4P-D, that approximately corrects for these deficiencies in modeling water dispersion interactions while maintaining compatibility with existing physics-based models. We show that simulations of solvated proteins using this new water model typically result in disordered states that are substantially more expanded and in better agreement with experiment. These results represent a significant step toward extending the range of applicability of MD simulations to include the study of (partially or fully) disordered protein states.

20 April 2012 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPhilipp Neudecker
Philipp Neudecker
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
ACAndrea Cavalli
Andrea Cavalli
PWPatrick Walsh
Patrick Walsh
PLPatrik Lundström
Patrik Lundström
LKLewis E. Kay
Lewis E. Kay
Protein Tipping Point: Amyloid fibrils are insoluble protein aggregates that play a role in various degenerative diseases. Recent experiments have provided insight into fibrillar structures; however, the mechanisms of aggregation remain unclear. Neudecker et al. (p. 362 ; see the Perspective by Eliezer ) report the structure of a transient folding intermediate in a protein SH3 domain known to undergo aggregation. The intermediate is stabilized by non-native interactions and exposes an aggregation-prone β strand. Thus, for this protein, folding from the intermediate state will compete with aggregation.

9 September 2009 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKai J. Kohlhoff
Kai J. Kohlhoff
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
ACAndrea Cavalli
Andrea Cavalli
XSXavier Salvatella
Xavier Salvatella
Michele VendruscoloMichele Vendruscolo
Michele Vendruscolo

1 August 2010 in Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
KKKai Kohlhoff
Kai Kohlhoff
ACAndrea Cavalli
Andrea Cavalli
Michele VendruscoloMichele Vendruscolo
Michele Vendruscolo

1 March 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPaul Robustelli
Paul Robustelli
KSKate A. Stafford
Kate A. Stafford
APArthur G. Palmer
Arthur G. Palmer