Jeanny Kwon

Prof. Dr. Jeanny Kwon

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2017 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKyung Su Kim
Kyung Su Kim
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
KKKyubo Kim
Kyubo Kim
ECEui Kyu Chie
Eui Kyu Chie
While curative resection is the only chance of cure in pancreatic cancer, controversies exist about the impact of surgical margin status on survival. Non-standardized pathologic report and different criteria on the R1 status made it difficult to implicate adjuvant therapy after resection based on the margin status. We evaluated the influence of resection margins on survival by meta-analysis. We thoroughly searched electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. We included studies reporting survival outcomes with different margin status: involved margin (R0 mm), margin clearance with ≤ 1 mm (R0-1 mm), and margin with > 1 mm (R>1 mm). Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. A total of eight retrospective studies involving 1,932 patients were included. Pooled HR for overall survival showed that patients with R>1 mm had reduced risk of death than those with R0-1 mm (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.88; p=0.001). In addition, patients with R0-1 mm had reduced risk of death than those with R0 mm (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91; p < 0.001). There was no heterogeneity between the included studies (I2 index, 42% and 0%; p=0.10 and p=0.82, respectively). Our results suggest that stratification of the patients based on margin status is warranted in the clinical trials assessing the role of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer.

1 May 2016 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
BKByoung Hyuck Kim
Byoung Hyuck Kim
HJHee-Won Jung
Hee-Won Jung
NBNikola Besic
Nikola Besic
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani
HWHong-Gyun Wu
Hong-Gyun Wu

15 July 2018 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
KEKeun-Yong Eom
Keun-Yong Eom
YKYoung Seok Kim
Young Seok Kim
WPWon Park
Won Park
MCMison Chun
Mison Chun
JCJihye Cha
Jihye Cha
We aimed to assess prognostic value of metastatic pelvic lymph node (mPLN) in early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Also, we sought to define a high-risk group using prognosticators for recurrence. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the data from 13 Korean institutions from 2000 to 2010. A total of 249 IB-IIA patients with high-risk factors were included. We evaluated distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in relation to clinicopathologic factors including pNstage, number of mPLN, lymph node (LN)ratio (number of positive LN/number of harvested LN), and log odds of mPLNs (log(number of positive LN+0.5/number of negative LN+0.5)). In univariate analysis, histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC] vs. others), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of mPLNs (≤ 3 vs. > 3), LN ratio (≤ 17% vs. > 17%), and log odds of mPLNs (≤ ‒0.58 vs. > ‒0.58) were significant prognosticators for DMFS and DFS. Resection margin involvement only affected DFS. No significant survival difference was observed between pN0 patients and patients with 1-3 mPLNs. Multivariate analysis revealed that mPLN > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC were unfavorable index for both DMFS (p < 0.001, p=0.020, and p=0.031, respectively) and DFS (p < 0.001, p=0.017, and p=0.001, respectively). A scoring system using these three factors predicts risk of recurrence with relatively high concordance index (DMFS, 0.69; DFS, 0.71). mPLN > 3 in early-stage cervical cancer affects DMFS and DFS. A scoring system using mPLNs > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC could stratify risk groups of recurrence in surgically resected early-stage cervix cancer with high-risk factors.

1 July 2015 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
BKByoung Hyuck Kim
Byoung Hyuck Kim
KKKyubo Kim
Kyubo Kim
ECEui Kyu Chie
Eui Kyu Chie
SHSung W. Ha
Sung W. Ha
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) in ampulla of Vater (AoV) cancer. The adjuvant treatment for AoV cancer is a subject of controversy without convincing evidence from randomized study. A comprehensive search was performed in the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Ovid from inception to July 2014. We included studies, which compared survival between patients with or without adjuvant RT after curative surgery solely for AoV cancer. Hazard ratio (HR) for OS was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Ten retrospective studies including 3361 patients met all inclusion criteria and were included for the final meta-analysis. Adjuvant RT was delivered with concurrent chemotherapy, mostly 5-fluorouracil, in all institutional studies. Generally, adjuvant RT groups included more patients with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis than did the surgery alone groups. The pooled results demonstrated that adjuvant RT significantly reduced the risk of death (HR = 0.75; P = 0.01). Exploratory analyses showed that patients with lymph node metastasis (HR = 0.52; P = 0.001) and locally advanced disease (HR = 0.42; P = 0.001) may also have survival benefit from adjuvant RT. No clear evidence of publication bias was found. This is the first meta-analysis evaluating the role of adjuvant RT in AoV cancer. Our results suggest the potential for survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Further studies, preferably randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm our results.

27 October 2017 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKByoung Hyuck Kim
Byoung Hyuck Kim
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
ECEui Kyu Chie
Eui Kyu Chie
KKKyubo Kim
Kyubo Kim
YKYoung Hoon Kim
Young Hoon Kim
JHJoseph M. Herman
Joseph M. Herman

15 April 2017 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKByoung Hyuck Kim
Byoung Hyuck Kim
KKKyubo Kim
Kyubo Kim
ECEui Kyu Chie
Eui Kyu Chie
JKJeanny Kwon
Jeanny Kwon
JJJin-Young Jang
Jin-Young Jang
YBYung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang
This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) in a high-volume center and to identify the prognostic impact of clinicopathologic factors. A total of 132 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrieved from the institutional database from January 1995 to September 2009. All patients received adjuvant treatments at a median of 45 days after the surgery. Median follow-up duration was 57 months (range, 6 to 225 months) for all patients and 105 months for survivors (range, 13 to 225 months). The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 70.7%, 55.7%, 49.4%, and 48.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed poorly differentiated (P/D) tumors and lymph node (LN) metastasis were significantly associated with DMFS and OS. Additionally, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was significantly correlated with DFS, LRRFS, and DMFS. Upon multivariate analysis for OS, P/D tumors (p=0.015) and LN metastasis (p=0.003) were significant prognosticators that predicted inferior OS. Grade 3 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in only one patient (0.8%). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after PD for DCC is an effective and tolerable strategy without significant side effects. During long-term follow-up, we found that prognosis of DCC was mainly influenced by histologic differentiation and LN metastasis. For patients with these risk factors, further research should focus on improving adjuvant strategies as well as other treatment approaches.