Biological processes are regulated by underlying genes and their interactions that form gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Dysregulation of these GRNs can cause complex diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s and diabetes. Hence, accurate GRN inference is critical for elucidating gene function, allowing for the faster identification and prioritization of candidate genes for functional investigation. Several statistical and machine learning-based methods have been developed to infer GRNs based on biological and synthetic datasets. Here, we developed a method named AGRN that infers GRNs by employing an ensemble of machine learning algorithms. From the idea that a single method may not perform well on all datasets, we calculate the gene importance scores using three machine learning methods—random forest, extra tree and support vector regressors. We calculate the importance scores from Shapley Additive Explanations, a recently published method to explain machine learning models. We have found that the importance scores from Shapley values perform better than the traditional importance scoring methods based on almost all the benchmark datasets. We have analyzed the performance of AGRN using the datasets from the DREAM4 and DREAM5 challenges for GRN inference. The proposed method, AGRN—an ensemble machine learning method with Shapley values, outperforms the existing methods both in the DREAM4 and DREAM5 datasets. With improved accuracy, we believe that AGRN inferred GRNs would enhance our mechanistic understanding of biological processes in health and disease. https://github.com/DuaaAlawad/AGRN. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Completing the genotype-to-phenotype map requires rigorous measurement of the entire multivariate organismal phenotype. However, phenotyping on a large scale is not feasible for many kinds of traits, resulting in missing data that can also cause problems for comparative analyses and the assessment of evolutionary trends across species. Measuring the multivariate performance phenotype is especially logistically challenging, and our ability to predict several performance traits from a given morphology is consequently poor. We developed a machine learning model to accurately estimate multivariate performance data from morphology alone by training it on a dataset containing performance and morphology data from 68 lizard species. Our final, stacked model predicts missing performance data accurately at the level of the individual from simple morphological measures. This model performed exceptionally well, even for performance traits that were missing values for >90% of the sampled individuals. Furthermore, incorporating phylogeny did not improve model fit, indicating that the phenotypic data alone preserved sufficient information to predict the performance based on morphological information. This approach can both significantly increase our understanding of performance evolution and act as a bridge to incorporate performance into future work on phenomics.

Protein molecules show varying degrees of flexibility throughout their three-dimensional structures. The flexibility is determined by the fluctuations in torsion angles, specifically phi (φ) and psi (ψ), which define the protein backbone. These angle fluctuations are derived from variations in backbone torsion angles observed in different models. By analyzing the fluctuations in Cartesian coordinate space, we can understand the structural flexibility of proteins. Predicting torsion angle fluctuations is valuable for determining protein function and structure when these angles act as constraints. In this study, a machine learning method called TAFPred is developed to predict torsion angle fluctuations using protein sequences directly. The method incorporates various features, such as disorder probability, position-specific scoring matrix profiles, secondary structure probabilities, and more. TAFPred, employing an optimized Light Gradient Boosting Machine Regressor (LightGBM), achieved high accuracy with correlation coefficients of 0.746 and 0.737 and mean absolute errors of 0.114 and 0.123 for the φ and ψ angles, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art method, TAFPred demonstrated significant improvements of 10.08% in MAE and 24.83% in PCC for the phi angle and 9.93% in MAE, and 22.37% in PCC for the psi angle.