Amphipols (APols) are short amphipathic polymers that can substitute for detergents to keep integral membrane proteins (MPs) water soluble. In this review, we discuss their structure and solution behavior; the way they associate with MPs; and the structure, dynamics, and solution properties of the resulting complexes. All MPs tested to date form water-soluble complexes with APols, and their biochemical stability is in general greatly improved compared with MPs in detergent solutions. The functionality and ligand-binding properties of APol-trapped MPs are reviewed, and the mechanisms by which APols stabilize MPs are discussed. Applications of APols include MP folding and cell-free synthesis, structural studies by NMR, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, APol-mediated immobilization of MPs onto solid supports, proteomics, delivery of MPs to preexisting membranes, and vaccine formulation.
Thymosin β4 is a major actin-sequestering protein, yet the structural basis for its biological function is still unknown. This study provides insight regarding the way this 43-amino acid peptide, mostly unstructured in solution, binds to monomeric actin and prevents its assembly in filaments. We show here that the whole backbone of thymosin β4 is highly affected upon binding to G-actin. The assignment of all amide protons and nitrogens of thymosin in the bound state, obtained using a combination of NMR experiments and selective labelings, shows that thymosin folds completely upon binding and displays a central extended region flanked by two N- and C-terminal helices. The cleavage of actin by subtilisin in the DNase I binding loop does not modify the structure of thymosin β4 in the complex, showing that the backbone of the peptide is not in close proximity to segment 42-47 of actin. The combination of our NMR results and previously published mutation and cross-link data allows a better characterization of the binding mode of thymosins on G-actin.
β‐Thymosin (βT) and WH2 domains are widespread, intrinsically disordered actin‐binding peptides that display significant sequence variability and different regulations of actin self‐assembly in motile and morphogenetic processes. Here, we reveal the structural mechanisms by which, in their 1:1 stoichiometric complexes with actin, they either inhibit assembly by sequestering actin monomers like Thymosin‐β4, or enhance motility by directing polarized filament assembly like Ciboulot βT. We combined mutational, functional or structural analysis by X‐ray crystallography, SAXS (small angle X‐ray scattering) and NMR on Thymosin‐β4, Ciboulot, TetraThymosinβ and the long WH2 domain of WASP‐interacting protein. The latter sequesters G‐actin with the same molecular mechanisms as Thymosin‐β4. Functionally different βT/WH2 domains differ by distinct dynamics of their C‐terminal half interactions with G‐actin pointed face. These C‐terminal interaction dynamics are controlled by the strength of electrostatic interactions with G‐actin. At physiological ionic strength, a single salt bridge with actin located next to their central LKKT/V motif induces G‐actin sequestration in both isolated long βT and WH2 domains. The results open perspectives for elucidating the functions of βT/WH2 domains in other modular proteins.