Several hepatic steatosis formulae have been validated in various cohorts using ultrasonography. However, none of these studies has been validated in a community-based setting using the gold standard method. Thus, the aim of this study was to externally validate hepatic steatosis formulae in community-based settings using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 1301 community-based health checkup subjects who underwent liver fat quantification with MRI were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) liver fat score showed the highest diagnostic performance with an AUROC of 0.72, followed by Framingham steatosis index (0.70), hepatic steatosis index (HSI, 0.69), ZJU index (0.69), and fatty liver index (FLI, 0.68). There were considerable gray zones in three fatty liver prediction models using two cutoffs (FLI, 28.9%; HSI, 48.9%; and ZJU index, 53.6%). The diagnostic performance of NAFLD liver fat score for detecting steatosis was comparable to that of ultrasonography. The diagnostic agreement was 72.7% between NAFLD liver fat score and 70.9% between ultrasound and MRI. In conclusion, the NAFLD liver fat score showed the best diagnostic performance for detecting hepatic steatosis. Its diagnostic performance was comparable to that of ultrasonography in a community-based setting.

Aims: To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the detection of hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cohorts using histopathology as the reference standard andcomparing it with that of various imaging modalities.Materials and methods: A total of 87 subjects who underwent UGAP, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) between December, 2020 and January, 2022 were enrolled. Of these patients, 38 patients had NAFLD. The association between UGAP and clinical and imaging parameters was assessed using Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlations. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance.Results: The UGAP and MRI-logPDFF demonstrated strong positive correlations (correlation coefficient= 0.704, P <0.0001). UGAP showed excellent diagnostic performance for distinguishing steatosis grade ≥1 with an AUROC of 0.821 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.729–0.913), which was comparable to that of MRI-PDFF (0.829, 95%CI, 0.723–0.936). The AUROCs of BUSG (B-mode ultrasonography) (0.766, 95% CI, 0.767–0.856) and CAP (0.788, 95% CI, 0.684–0.891) were slightly lower than those of UGAP. The AUROCs of UGAP, MRI-PDFF, CAP, and BUSG for detecting steatosis grade ≥2 were 0.796 (95% CI, 0.616–0.975), 0.971 (95% CI, 0.936–1.000), 0.726 (95% CI, 0.561–0.891) and 0.774 (95% CI, 0.612–0.936), respectively.Conclusion: UGAP may be a valuable potential screening tool as a first-line assessment of liver steatosis in patients with NAFLD.

Kang KA, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Oct;99(4):221-229. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.4.221

Due to its high prevalence, screening for hepatic fibrosis in the low-risk population is called for action in the primary care clinic. However, current guidelines provide conflicting recommendations on populations to be screened. We aimed to identify the target populations that would most benefit from screening for hepatic fibrosis in clinical practice. This study examined 1288 subjects who underwent magnetic resonance elastography. The diagnostic performance of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and NAFLD fibrosis score was compared in the following groups: (1) ultrasonography (USG)-diagnosed NAFLD, (2) elevated liver enzyme, (3) metabolic syndrome, (4) impaired fasting glucose, and (5) type 2 diabetes regardless of fatty liver. Decision curve analysis was performed to express the net benefit of groups over a range of probability thresholds (Pts). The diabetes group showed a better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC: 0.69) compared with subjects in the USG-diagnosed NAFLD (AUROC: 0.57) and elevated liver enzyme (AUROC: 0.55) groups based on the FIB-4 index. In decision curve analysis, the diabetes group showed the highest net benefit for the detection of significant fibrosis across a wide range of Pts. Patients with diabetes, even in the absence of fatty liver, would be preferable for hepatic fibrosis screening in low-risk populations.

김민제, et al. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2025 Nov;86(6):830-846. https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2025.0076