The increasing interest in bio-districts is part of the debate on the capacity to integrate agri-food systems and territory in order to improve the quality of life in rural communities. Considering the goals of developing and promoting an innovative territorial rural development approach, the bio-district can become a process toward a more sustainable model represented by the agroecological agriculture system. The paper presents a case study of the Parma bio-district through the approach of a Localized Agri Food System (LAFS) to verify whether bio-districts can be a tool for scaling up towards agroecology. Stakeholder classification and analysis are conducted using an influence–interest matrix. We identified four groups of stakeholders in relation to their interests and power to influence the process. In the case of the Parma bio-district the role of local institutions in dialogue with consumers and producers’ associations is crucial for success. We conclude that bio-districts can be a tool for a scaling-up towards agroecology since they can facilitate a synergetic relation between organic and agroecological agriculture, spreading organic agriculture more widely around the local area. However, the involvement of a wide variety of different stakeholders means that governance is a key element in facilitating “cross fertilization” and preventing the process from becoming purely formulaic.

Organic Agriculture and Agroecology are production systems considered relevant for building up sustainable food systems at an environmental, social and economic level. In recent years there has been a growing interest in considering which processes can contribute to upscaling these systems. At a global level Agroecological Local Agri-food Systems and Bio-districts are becoming beacons for that purpose. This paper presents a case study of an organic and agroecological group of producers in the Argentinian Pampa Region where we used the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach in implementing three interconnected methodologies: (i) Sustainability assessment using the FAO Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE), (ii) Participatory Value chain Development and (iii) Stakeholder Analysis. This was done to verify if the combination of methodologies can be useful to (i) evaluate the current situation of the group in terms of LAFS development and (ii) identify which possible activities would be required for upscaling organic and agroecological practices at a regional level with a neo-endogenous approach. We conclude that the participative assessment implemented was useful to identify the group stage in terms of LAFS development and also to identify the activation requirements for upscaling the system at the same time that the participatory process addressed and organized a set of procedures in the hands of the group for implementing that process.

The global malnutrition crisis—marked by the simultaneous presence of hunger, un-dernutrition, and obesity—affects billions of people worldwide. This complex and widespread issue is deeply intertwined with today’s escalating environmental chal-lenges, including climate change, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss. These problems are largely driven by current food systems, which not only fail to provide adequate nutrition for all but also contribute significantly to environmental degradation. Argen-tina, as a major global food producer, exemplifies this paradox: despite its vast agricultural capacity, nearly 70% of its population suffers from some form of malnutrition. This paper examines the potential of organic agriculture and agroecology to transform food systems in ways that promote sustainability and health, aligning with the United Nations Sus-tainable Development Goals (SDGs). Focusing on Buenos Aires, the study investigates the availability, cost, and affordability of organic and agroecological diets in accordance with both international and national dietary guidelines. Linear programming is applied to assess these diets in relation to the basic food basket, revealing economic challenges and opportunities within the city’s food landscape. The results demonstrate the validity of the model in identifying the costs and potential economic accessibility of such diets for the population, providing valuable insights for segmenting and clarifying potential path-ways for scaling these diets, as well as comparing different contexts and realities.

The global malnutrition crisis—marked by the simultaneous presence of hunger, undernutrition, and obesity—affects billions of people worldwide. This complex and widespread issue is deeply intertwined with today’s escalating environmental challenges, including climate change, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss. These problems are largely driven by the current food systems, which not only fail to provide adequate nutrition for all but also contribute significantly to environmental degradation. Argentina, as a major global food producer, exemplifies this paradox: despite its vast agricultural capacity, nearly 70% of its population suffers from some form of malnutrition. This paper examines the potential of organic agriculture and agroecology to transform food systems in ways that promote sustainability and health, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Focusing on Buenos Aires, the study investigates the availability, cost, and affordability of organic and agroecological diets in accordance with both international and national dietary guidelines. This is the first study in Argentina—and among the first internationally—to analyze the affordability of diets exclusively based on organic and agroecological products. Linear programming is applied to assess these diets in relation to the basic food basket, revealing economic challenges and opportunities within the city’s food landscape. The results demonstrate the validity of the model in identifying the costs and potential economic accessibility of such diets for the population, providing valuable insights for segmenting and clarifying potential pathways for scaling these diets, as well as comparing different contexts and realities.